click for FREE hookups
Rubrankings.com
Click here for the best sugar babies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Ava Escorts
Sex Vacation
click for FREE hookups

Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls

+ Add Report
Page 24 of 495 FirstFirst ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 74 124 ... LastLast
Results 346 to 360 of 7425
This blog is moderated by BonerAppetitty
  1. #7080
    Quote Originally Posted by RockItAllNite  [View Original Post]
    All Spicedolls are "negotiable". Riley is a waste of time though and Davika is not my type. She is skinny with no assets.
    Riley force sold me BBFS, asked for my check date, looked like she wanted to read the results too but did it anyway. No CIP. What's the point?

  2. #7079
    Quote Originally Posted by CreamFire  [View Original Post]
    Anyone tried Davika from spicedolls? Looks hot and menu said bb negotiable.

    https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/spicedolls4/150779/
    She lacks any boobs. Hard to get excited!

  3. #7078

    Baby sweet

    Gave baby sweet a try this weekend. Got to the door thinking tulip / suzy might be the one answering the door but seems baby sweet is just roommates with her. In comparison to tulip they are about the same age, mid-late 20's. Tulip is more hot while sweet on the cuter side. I prefer hot so I like tulip's look more. You might like sweet if you like them more natural looking. Sweet has pale skin. Seems to bruise easy based on some of the marks on her body; be easy on her. Body type similar to Ina but no mm melons. Sweet has better service than Tulip. Sweet sucks the popsicles like a vacuum, which is the way I like it done. Loves dfk but could use some practice. Cute personality and friendly. It was like hooking up with a cute korean friend from college. Look's a solid 8 but higher if you like them looking cute and natural looking. I save my 9's for hot looking ones like Tulip, Celine, or Baby Sugar. Have not seen Shani / Binny. Is she utr bb?

    https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-sweet

  4. #7077

    Bunny a not so HYA

    Quote Originally Posted by Migs1224  [View Original Post]
    Pics are of kpop girl Habin.
    Yep. Saw her yesterday. Not worth the money and time. I will post review on LA Asian Girls forum.

  5. #7076

    Pics

    Quote Originally Posted by SpideyLennon  [View Original Post]
    Anybody here saw Bunny from CGLA, SAG? I feel like she's a rebrand. I might try her later, I'll report back.
    Pics are of kpop girl Habin.

  6. #7075
    Quote Originally Posted by CreamFire  [View Original Post]
    Anyone tried Davika from spicedolls? Looks hot and menu said bb negotiable.

    https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/spicedolls4/150779/
    All Spicedolls are "negotiable". Riley is a waste of time though and Davika is not my type. She is skinny with no assets.

  7. #7074

    Bunny

    Anybody here saw Bunny from CGLA, SAG? I feel like she's a rebrand. I might try her later, I'll report back.

  8. #7073
    Quote Originally Posted by Kayo4  [View Original Post]
    Saw her on her first day in OC. If Freesia is a 10, I would say Princess is a 7 at best face wise, maybe 8 if she had makeup. Definitely nice young, tall body, 5'7"-5'8". I'd believe her age. Hard to tell if her boobs were MM but the nipples did point up a bit if you like that and were pretty nice. She felt young when she on top of me fucking, if you know that what that means. She's more CYA than hot, and she kinda reminded me a little like NG with her face (I didn't think NG was hot, but she made up for it in other ways). Service is lacking though. Best part was BBBJ but the rest was subpar. She's nice, but distant, doesn't like DFK. She has no stamina, so for those wanting to fuck most of the hour may not enjoy her. Needed to take a few breaks with me. If you like tall and young and aren't really looking for anything else, she's your girl. BB but no CIP.

    Again, the most recent comparable recent price point is Freesia, and while imo Freesia was an instant hard on and definite repeat, Princess isn't even in the same league unfortunately.
    Thank-you for the report and save me some money!

  9. #7072
    Quote Originally Posted by CreamFire  [View Original Post]
    She is Celine doing BB. Just kidding. Someone must have tried her right?
    Saw her on her first day in OC. If Freesia is a 10, I would say Princess is a 7 at best face wise, maybe 8 if she had makeup. Definitely nice young, tall body, 5'7"-5'8". I'd believe her age. Hard to tell if her boobs were MM but the nipples did point up a bit if you like that and were pretty nice. She felt young when she on top of me fucking, if you know that what that means. She's more CYA than hot, and she kinda reminded me a little like NG with her face (I didn't think NG was hot, but she made up for it in other ways). Service is lacking though. Best part was BBBJ but the rest was subpar. She's nice, but distant, doesn't like DFK. She has no stamina, so for those wanting to fuck most of the hour may not enjoy her. Needed to take a few breaks with me. If you like tall and young and aren't really looking for anything else, she's your girl. BB but no CIP.

    Again, the most recent comparable recent price point is Freesia, and while imo Freesia was an instant hard on and definite repeat, Princess isn't even in the same league unfortunately.

  10. #7071

    Shani

    I managed to see Shani this week. She's definitely for those who like spinners, she's not my favorite girl, I like girls with curves like Suji or Baby ai (j-girl).

    But of the spinners I saw, she is without a doubt the prettiest, with the most beautiful and youngest body. She reminded me a lot of Miso, but younger and with much better service. I liked it but I'm unlikely to repeat it as it's not my type of girl, but for those who like spinners it's a must.

  11. #7070

    Thai or Filipina ABG

    Anyone tried Davika from spicedolls? Looks hot and menu said bb negotiable.

    https://www.humaniplex.com/photos/spicedolls4/150779/

  12. #7069

    Hari / Tulip is good

    Quote Originally Posted by BobLove  [View Original Post]
    LOL. Tulip = Suzy = Hari. Service and appearance is good IMO.
    She really is underrated or just YMMV? Gives really good dfk and allows pounding to continue after completion. It's a beautiful sight watching the cream pumped back in and love the sound it makes from her box.

  13. #7068

    Still no one?

    Quote Originally Posted by HongKongBoy  [View Original Post]
    Does anyone have any information about Princess from https://www.candygirlla.com/?.
    She is Celine doing BB. Just kidding. Someone must have tried her right?

  14. #7067

    Shani

    Quote Originally Posted by PogeyBait  [View Original Post]
    I've seen Shani, not the other two. Fake pics but pretty imo. Some mongers on the PLEASER thread are having a debate on her hotness but she's definitely younger than most providers on an extensive roster. Decent BBBJ but no BBFS so be aware before making the appointment.
    People are actually arguing about whether Shani is hot or not? Damn, some of those dudes must have super high expectations. I would say Shani is (objectively speaking) one of the hottest k-girls working in LA right now. I often joke with her that she could pass for 19 or 20, but I think she actually could. Her body is insane. I'd guess she is no older than 25 or 26. And if you like sexy little spinners, she is the classic definition of a spinner. Of course, if you prefer a 5'8' 120 lbs runway model. OK, then Shani isn't your type. But good luck finding a 5'8" k-girl. Not many of those in town.

  15. #7066
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1109
    Quote Originally Posted by BuildingGuy  [View Original Post]
    I have not seen Tulip but a reliable booker advised me to not book her because of bad service.
    LOL. Tulip = Suzy = Hari. Service and appearance is good IMO.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
Best Escorts





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape