Hot Young Asian Girls

**SunsetMando** · Today 10:45

Baby sol is a HYA for sure!

1 hour, 2 pops and BB. She felt amazing!

I wouldn't attempt if I was MAG.

But for my size, after starting a bit slow she took it like a champ. And the site of a hottie giving a fantastic BBBJ was amazing.

First pop I gave her a nice creampie.

Second was more BB positions and finished with CIM. She's great!

I would see her again, but I also likely will try new options because there seems to be a bunch of new gals in town.

Not a service QUEEN. But she has decent english and does her best to satisfy. Looks, age, and that tight P is enough for me to return.

**SsStuntCock** · Yesterday 21:28

Originally Posted by MadderMax [View Original Post]

Rule of three: young, pretty, service queen, pick two.

Baby Sol is ATF young & pretty for sure, while service was sub-standard. For spinner connoisseurs, I'd unequivocally say she's worth a spin for 30 min, but you'll likely burn up the clock tryna make it fit.

Mags?? You don't need to see her identification. These aren't the droids you're looking for. You can go about your business. Move along, move along.

**MadderMax** · Yesterday 19:07

Rule of three: young, pretty, service queen, pick two.

**Raist** · 05-03-24 21:54

I've benefitted from this community a ton and so I TOFTT with Baby Soo, advertised as new and young.

TLDR: She's young and pretty hot. Service totally lacking.

Mid-20's, tall-ish (5'5? 5'6?) and full model-esque figure. Cute face if you don't mind the obvious work. Large man-made that felt okay and look great on her. Lots of tattoos on her back but still tasteful. Service was distant and awkward. She's clearly new to this and not enthusiastic. No kissing, light BBBJ, and mechanical sex. Little to no eye contact. I had to take the lead and switch to doggy to finish.

Wouldn't repeat. She's pretty hot and definitely still young, but I need at least a bit of faked enthusiasm to really enjoy it. Back to Shani until we find a HYA who enjoys the work.

She said she'll leave in a few weeks.

**Nnnnnieg** · 05-03-24 17:34

Any info for baby soyul?

**InternDavid** · 05-03-24 12:55

Originally Posted by KGConn [View Original Post]

She used to have real pics, but the current ones here aren't. These are definitely AI.

Thanks everyone for confirming what I suspected. That's disappointing they changed out the real pics.

**DanJanson** · 05-02-24 15:13

Just saw her. She's quite pretty. 5'7 to 5'8. I can see comparisons to a naeyon noona from certain angles. She's got what Koreans deem good looking: white skin, jet black hair, and sharp facial features.

Can def see the matching with Stella. In height, figure and nice face.

It seems like her service got better from last year. I can vouch that she's a sweetheart. Good GFE service.

We kept kissing all the way to the end. Decent blowie and paid attention to the balls.

Doggystyle is a sight to behold. Felt like I was banging a tall stripper. Her ass and skin in general in very well kept and soft, porcelain white.

Probably in her mid 30's but can pass for late 20's. I mostly prefer spinners but her modelesque body is a great change of pace.

**LoveFromFrank** · 05-02-24 15:12

Originally Posted by KGConn [View Original Post]

She used to have real pics, but the current ones here aren't. These are definitely AI.

WTF you're right. Its so blatant and obvious that it makes me wonder why she would choose to sport those pictures. Even a few body shots without the face would be preferable than that if you were trying to market yourself to other people than those who have already visited.

**AsianAssEater** · 05-02-24 12:54

Originally Posted by InternDavid [View Original Post]

So, apparently GKS is stating Baby Sky's pics are real. These look heavily photoshopped and the last pic looks like a different girl or AI generated. Can anyone confirm?

I know sometimes bookers get wrong info from the agency.

https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babysky/

Those new pics are all AI.

**KGConn** · 05-02-24 12:52

Originally Posted by InternDavid [View Original Post]

So, apparently GKS is stating Baby Sky's pics are real. These look heavily photoshopped and the last pic looks like a different girl or AI generated. Can anyone confirm?

I know sometimes bookers get wrong info from the agency.

https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babysky/

She used to have real pics, but the current ones here aren't. These are definitely AI.

**TD Leafs** · 05-02-24 12:48

Originally Posted by InternDavid [View Original Post]

So, apparently GKS is stating Baby Sky's pics are real. These look heavily photoshopped and the last pic looks like a different girl or AI generated. Can anyone confirm?

I know sometimes bookers get wrong info from the agency.

https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babysky/

LOL, not even close.

**InternDavid** · 05-02-24 12:45

So, apparently GKS is stating Baby Sky's pics are real. These look heavily photoshopped and the last pic looks like a different girl or AI generated. Can anyone confirm?

I know sometimes bookers get wrong info from the agency.

https://gardenksecret.cuties-sites.com/babysky/

**Tbtbfftb** · 05-02-24 11:31

Tried Yummy.

I think those are basically her pics. Maybe 5'3 but seems taller because she is slim. Soft man mades. Tight and takes reasonable depth. Early / mid 20's. Very pleasant and willing to please. Only complaint is her mouth is very small. Very toothy BJ basically had her lick the sides.

Worth a try especially if you are into to slender types.

**RockItAllNite** · 05-02-24 11:01

Is this the "Rie" of legend? The passionate hottie with the beautiful face that only makes a fleeting appearance and then disappears for years? The measurements and select schedule all point to it being her. Can anyone confirm or deny? https://topangels.ch/topangel/rie/ She is GFE only but hot hot hot!

**AsianAssEater** · 05-01-24 23:19

Originally Posted by MadderMax [View Original Post]

I'm sure the "YMMV" is always in effect on her service (which was ok, but nothing stellar), I will say Yuha is at least forty. Granted her body is decent, with MMs, and some curves, but in no way is she in her 30's. And the photos (like most korgs) are almost ridiculously inaccurate. It's gotten to the point the photos look AI generated. I've actually had a handful of K-Girls in their 20's over the years (decades?) and they look very young, but most were a bit hesitant when it comes to service.

I rely on word of mouth from trusted sources (some here) to make my choices. Then again, I can tolerate a bit of "experience" on some K-Girls due to their service queen status.

Just one persons opinions though. To each his / her own.

It's either AI or ig Korean models. If the face in the pictures looked messed up it's probably real pics.