Ad Commentary

[MongerT]

https://web.archive.org/web/20220112050237/https://daytona.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/can-you-handle-two-of-us-rig/146862839555[/URL]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...g/146862839555

It's really too bad they come as a pair. I would hit up the blonde right now if the brunette wasn't gatekeeping. I don't blame her. I wouldn't share the blonde's number either, LOL.

Cheers!

If the urge becomes such you find yourself otw to the party just remember the one holding the pics flaps back is the ace hardware thief in Holly hill.

[Joshua Falken]

https://web.archive.org/web/20220112...g/146862839555

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...g/146862839555

It's really too bad they come as a pair. I would hit up the blonde right now if the brunette wasn't gatekeeping. I don't blame her. I wouldn't share the blonde's number either, LOL.

Cheers!

[Joshua Falken]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...e/008334866233

http://web.archive.org/web/202201090...e/008334866233

LOL, this ad has got more red flags than a May Day parade:

• Pics are a little too cute considering the average provider in this area.

• "Hair color" listed as brunette. Doesn't explain the cute blonde whose pics are posted in the ad.

• "Location" gives you a number to text instead of an actual geographical location. This ad is probably running in several states and Dmitry the scammer can't be bothered to familiarize himself with all the towns he's claiming.

• From the ad: "My service: BJ,Oral,Anal,69, D.o.g.g.y Style. Uber Outcall, Car Fun Hotel". Nice try, Dmitry. No provider is going to post explicit descriptions of sexual services right next to her pics, she's practically doing the prosecutor's job for him.

• Also from the ad:"Fun Available. bbw curvy". This trollop lists herself at 119, far from "bbw / curvy".

Man, this fake ad couldn't be more obvious.

UPDATE: As of 9:00 pm the ad was taken down from STG. I knew it was bull$hit.

For posting an archived link. Makes me all warm anf fuzzy inside.

Cheers!

[Smut Villian]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...e/008334866233

http://web.archive.org/web/202201090...e/008334866233

LOL, this ad has got more red flags than a May Day parade:

• Pics are a little too cute considering the average provider in this area.

• "Hair color" listed as brunette. Doesn't explain the cute blonde whose pics are posted in the ad.

• "Location" gives you a number to text instead of an actual geographical location. This ad is probably running in several states and Dmitry the scammer can't be bothered to familiarize himself with all the towns he's claiming.

• From the ad: "My service: BJ,Oral,Anal,69, D.o.g.g.y Style. Uber Outcall, Car Fun Hotel". Nice try, Dmitry. No provider is going to post explicit descriptions of sexual services right next to her pics, she's practically doing the prosecutor's job for him.

• Also from the ad:"Fun Available. bbw curvy". This trollop lists herself at 119, far from "bbw / curvy".

Man, this fake ad couldn't be more obvious.

UPDATE: As of 9:00 pm the ad was taken down from STG. I knew it was bull$hit.

[SidSeduction]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[BeachRunner51]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...p/171254080287

https://web.archive.org/web/20211218...p/171254080287

I'm sitting here reading your ad, nodding along and thinking, "This is a pretty badass chick. Reminds me of Raelynn's no nonsense ads. Pretty damn hot too."

Then I'm thinking, "I'm going to reach out to this lass for a play date," when I get to the part where you'll block anyone who won't FaceTime with you.

Nope, hard pass.

I will never share a real face pic, nor FaceTime with any provider. I honestly have no idea what you believe you'll glean from an image that you can't get from a normal phone call. Just the opportunity to discriminate against how a monger looks I'd reckon.

It's funny, I was setting up a date with a provider last week when, at the last minute, she demands a face pic to "prove I'm not a scammer or a cop." I laughed out loud. First, I told her that there is nothing about my face that will reveal either of those things one way or another, unless of course she performs an image search and learns exactly who I am (more on that later). Then I told her thanks but no thanks, and proceeded to have a lovely time with a more reasonable lass.

So here's the thing love. Clearly you're hot. Clearly you're skilled, as evidenced by JackRabbit000's report (though you do have a bit of a PR and time management problem just now). Yet sadly, many quality mongers such as myself will never reach out to you, because we will never FaceTime with anyone. I think my gripe is succinctly summarized in Dirtona #860: "Never send a provider a real face pic (or FaceTime in this case, which, after a quick screenshot, is the same thing). Nineteen times out of twenty it won't be a problem. It's that twentieth time when her boyfriend looks you up on social media then blackmails your ass that you'll wish you heeded this advice."

So you do whatever you need to feel safe. Just consider that you may not be adding any real safely to your process over a normal voice call, and you are certainly chasing away good money with your FaceTime demand. No disrespect intended to those lads willing to FaceTime to try and set up a date, but consider this Lita: The type of gentlemen who refuse to FaceTime are often the very gentlemen you'd love to ad to your client list. We tend to be the highly educated and well-mannered professionals or well-heeled retirees. We have high paying jobs or fat retirement accounts. We have families and positions of respect in our communities. We serve on local PTAs and corporate advisory boards. We have these things, and are extremely reticent to risk losing these things for a quick shag, because we are, in fact, intelligent people who are unwilling to take foolish or needless chances.... and there is scarcely a more needless chance than FaceTiming a provider from STG in the vague hopes that it will result in a great experience.

I would, therefore, sincerely urge any intransigent provider to seriously consider what these pic and video requests are really doing for your safety over other means, and to think hard about a business model designed to scare off the very best clientele.

Well, best to leave it there love. Sorry we won't be spending time together as you seem like you might be my type.

Cheers!

She list her weight in the ad you saved as 170 lbs. That will also drive away a lot of business.

[TheRealStifler]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...p/171254080287

https://web.archive.org/web/20211218...p/171254080287

I'm sitting here reading your ad, nodding along and thinking, "This is a pretty badass chick. Reminds me of Raelynn's no nonsense ads. Pretty damn hot too."

Then I'm thinking, "I'm going to reach out to this lass for a play date," when I get to the part where you'll block anyone who won't FaceTime with you.

Nope, hard pass.

I will never share a real face pic, nor FaceTime with any provider. I honestly have no idea what you believe you'll glean from an image that you can't get from a normal phone call. Just the opportunity to discriminate against how a monger looks I'd reckon.

It's funny, I was setting up a date with a provider last week when, at the last minute, she demands a face pic to "prove I'm not a scammer or a cop." I laughed out loud. First, I told her that there is nothing about my face that will reveal either of those things one way or another, unless of course she performs an image search and learns exactly who I am (more on that later). Then I told her thanks but no thanks, and proceeded to have a lovely time with a more reasonable lass.

So here's the thing love. Clearly you're hot. Clearly you're skilled, as evidenced by JackRabbit000's report (though you do have a bit of a PR and time management problem just now). Yet sadly, many quality mongers such as myself will never reach out to you, because we will never FaceTime with anyone. I think my gripe is succinctly summarized in Dirtona #860: "Never send a provider a real face pic (or FaceTime in this case, which, after a quick screenshot, is the same thing). Nineteen times out of twenty it won't be a problem. It's that twentieth time when her boyfriend looks you up on social media then blackmails your ass that you'll wish you heeded this advice."

So you do whatever you need to feel safe. Just consider that you may not be adding any real safely to your process over a normal voice call, and you are certainly chasing away good money with your FaceTime demand. No disrespect intended to those lads willing to FaceTime to try and set up a date, but consider this Lita: The type of gentlemen who refuse to FaceTime are often the very gentlemen you'd love to ad to your client list. We tend to be the highly educated and well-mannered professionals or well-heeled retirees. We have high paying jobs or fat retirement accounts. We have families and positions of respect in our communities. We serve on local PTAs and corporate advisory boards. We have these things, and are extremely reticent to risk losing these things for a quick shag, because we are, in fact, intelligent people who are unwilling to take foolish or needless chances.... and there is scarcely a more needless chance than FaceTiming a provider from STG in the vague hopes that it will result in a great experience.

I would, therefore, sincerely urge any intransigent provider to seriously consider what these pic and video requests are really doing for your safety over other means, and to think hard about a business model designed to scare off the very best clientele.

Well, best to leave it there love. Sorry we won't be spending time together as you seem like you might be my type.

Cheers!

I would never engage in any activity where there was any chance of me being blackmailed. I mean there's ALOT to be said about being careful and taking precautions, but who's to stop some smooth professional from slipping the deadbolt and coming in with a camera on and recording?

Since I have no liabilities I'd be pissed that my session got interrupted but. And why'know, blackmailers get hurt. Bad sometimes.

It's all a risky business!

So, why'all stay safe out there. Me? I've been taking a break, but I particularly hate blackmailers so took the opportunity to chime in.

[BeachRunner51]

Well written and exactly on point.

She won't be getting any of my extensive cash flow. Very well point made Sir Falken.

[MiloYamBags]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...p/171254080287

https://web.archive.org/web/20211218...p/171254080287

I'm sitting here reading your ad, nodding along and thinking, "This is a pretty badass chick. Reminds me of Raelynn's no nonsense ads. Pretty damn hot too."

Then I'm thinking, "I'm going to reach out to this lass for a play date," when I get to the part where you'll block anyone who won't FaceTime with you.

Nope, hard pass.

I will never share a real face pic, nor FaceTime with any provider. I honestly have no idea what you believe you'll glean from an image that you can't get from a normal phone call. Just the opportunity to discriminate against how a monger looks I'd reckon.

It's funny, I was setting up a date with a provider last week when, at the last minute, she demands a face pic to "prove I'm not a scammer or a cop." I laughed out loud. First, I told her that there is nothing about my face that will reveal either of those things one way or another, unless of course she performs an image search and learns exactly who I am (more on that later). Then I told her thanks but no thanks, and proceeded to have a lovely time with a more reasonable lass.

So here's the thing love. Clearly you're hot. Clearly you're skilled, as evidenced by JackRabbit000's report (though you do have a bit of a PR and time management problem just now). Yet sadly, many quality mongers such as myself will never reach out to you, because we will never FaceTime with anyone. I think my gripe is succinctly summarized in Dirtona #860: "Never send a provider a real face pic (or FaceTime in this case, which, after a quick screenshot, is the same thing). Nineteen times out of twenty it won't be a problem. It's that twentieth time when her boyfriend looks you up on social media then blackmails your ass that you'll wish you heeded this advice."

So you do whatever you need to feel safe. Just consider that you may not be adding any real safely to your process over a normal voice call, and you are certainly chasing away good money with your FaceTime demand. No disrespect intended to those lads willing to FaceTime to try and set up a date, but consider this Lita: The type of gentlemen who refuse to FaceTime are often the very gentlemen you'd love to ad to your client list. We tend to be the highly educated and well-mannered professionals or well-heeled retirees. We have high paying jobs or fat retirement accounts. We have families and positions of respect in our communities. We serve on local PTAs and corporate advisory boards. We have these things, and are extremely reticent to risk losing these things for a quick shag, because we are, in fact, intelligent people who are unwilling to take foolish or needless chances.... and there is scarcely a more needless chance than FaceTiming a provider from STG in the vague hopes that it will result in a great experience.

I would, therefore, sincerely urge any intransigent provider to seriously consider what these pic and video requests are really doing for your safety over other means, and to think hard about a business model designed to scare off the very best clientele.

Well, best to leave it there love. Sorry we won't be spending time together as you seem like you might be my type.

Cheers!

Well written and exactly on point.

[Joshua Falken]

https://daytona.skipthegames.com/fem...p/171254080287

https://web.archive.org/web/20211218...p/171254080287

I'm sitting here reading your ad, nodding along and thinking, "This is a pretty badass chick. Reminds me of Raelynn's no nonsense ads. Pretty damn hot too."

Then I'm thinking, "I'm going to reach out to this lass for a play date," when I get to the part where you'll block anyone who won't FaceTime with you.

Nope, hard pass.

I will never share a real face pic, nor FaceTime with any provider. I honestly have no idea what you believe you'll glean from an image that you can't get from a normal phone call. Just the opportunity to discriminate against how a monger looks I'd reckon.

It's funny, I was setting up a date with a provider last week when, at the last minute, she demands a face pic to "prove I'm not a scammer or a cop." I laughed out loud. First, I told her that there is nothing about my face that will reveal either of those things one way or another, unless of course she performs an image search and learns exactly who I am (more on that later). Then I told her thanks but no thanks, and proceeded to have a lovely time with a more reasonable lass.

So here's the thing love. Clearly you're hot. Clearly you're skilled, as evidenced by JackRabbit000's report (though you do have a bit of a PR and time management problem just now). Yet sadly, many quality mongers such as myself will never reach out to you, because we will never FaceTime with anyone. I think my gripe is succinctly summarized in Dirtona #860: "Never send a provider a real face pic (or FaceTime in this case, which, after a quick screenshot, is the same thing). Nineteen times out of twenty it won't be a problem. It's that twentieth time when her boyfriend looks you up on social media then blackmails your ass that you'll wish you heeded this advice."

So you do whatever you need to feel safe. Just consider that you may not be adding any real safely to your process over a normal voice call, and you are certainly chasing away good money with your FaceTime demand. No disrespect intended to those lads willing to FaceTime to try and set up a date, but consider this Lita: The type of gentlemen who refuse to FaceTime are often the very gentlemen you'd love to ad to your client list. We tend to be the highly educated and well-mannered professionals or well-heeled retirees. We have high paying jobs or fat retirement accounts. We have families and positions of respect in our communities. We serve on local PTAs and corporate advisory boards. We have these things, and are extremely reticent to risk losing these things for a quick shag, because we are, in fact, intelligent people who are unwilling to take foolish or needless chances.... and there is scarcely a more needless chance than FaceTiming a provider from STG in the vague hopes that it will result in a great experience.

I would, therefore, sincerely urge any intransigent provider to seriously consider what these pic and video requests are really doing for your safety over other means, and to think hard about a business model designed to scare off the very best clientele.

Well, best to leave it there love. Sorry we won't be spending time together as you seem like you might be my type.

Cheers!

[Jmoedb]

I was researching a different lass when I stumbled upon this ad from early October. I had to laugh. Everything about it screams LEO. I hope none of our brethren contacted that ad.

If this isn't a LEO ad, this provider or scammer is profoundly bad at ad writing.

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ytona/68313087

If you don't know why this ad screams PoPo, please state such here so we can open a dialogue on the subject.

Cheers!

She rolls with a gang of other girls who travel and tour. The downside is they have management who handles all their marketing per say. They treat this like a buisness and act as such. Pretty pricey as well.

[Joshua Falken]

Bad writing is usually a given with working girls. Some worse then others. And to add if she's legit or not, she has 10 positive reviews on Escort Babylon and 20 or so comments about her services / looks / legit-ness. The reviews go back to 2019 too, seems like she would be a good TOFTT candidate if she was back in town.

My comments are more about the construction of the ad than its subject (the provider). It's like she used a LEO sting template to build her ad, LOL.

1. Tell the John not to use anonymous texting apps so they message with their personal phones. This makes their identities easy to determine.

2. State explicitly in the ad that the provider does not discriminate so the arrest stands up in court, since a sting should not unfairly target any group or ethnicity over another.

3. Demand the John complete a video verification so a face and voice recording can be obtained. If he's foolish, the John may even incriminate himself on camera, even if he never shows up.

4. Don't show any pornographic content in any picture.

Maybe in her next ad she could ask for a signed and notarized confession, LOL! I've got to hand it to her, she writes a fantastic sting ad.

Cheers!

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ytona/68313087

[LuvGourmet]

Bad writing is usually a given with working girls. Some worse then others. And to add if she's legit or not, she has 10 positive reviews on Escort Babylon and 20 or so comments about her services / looks / legit-ness. The reviews go back to 2019 too, seems like she would be a good TOFTT candidate if she was back in town.

Her Only Fans account seems to be real also. Didn't subscribe but seems to have a bunch of posts.

[PapiCholo]

LOL, yeah, probably not LEO. I wasn't positive, which is why I wrote the disclaimer "If this isn't a LEO ad, this provider or scammer is profoundly bad at ad writing". I still don't know if the ad's legit, truth be told. Your own researches now make me think setup, just because I haven't seen so many red flags in a single ad since the Flagler sting (this one was verified LEO):

https://web.archive.org/web/20210617...n/027794812280

Anyway, the premise holds. I can't imagine a monger in their right mind who would contact that ad. And the author, whoever it was, is still profoundly bad at ad writing!

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ytona/68313087

Cheers!

Bad writing is usually a given with working girls. Some worse then others. And to add if she's legit or not, she has 10 positive reviews on Escort Babylon and 20 or so comments about her services / looks / legit-ness. The reviews go back to 2019 too, seems like she would be a good TOFTT candidate if she was back in town.

[Joshua Falken]

There is a positive review on her in Charlotte, NC where she is based out of and also a robbery setup report. If she is LEO, they are doing long cons to nab johns? She has ads dating back to 2019 with the same number. LEO's usually don't have ads running for over 2 years to do stings, LOL.

LOL, yeah, probably not LEO. I wasn't positive, which is why I wrote the disclaimer "If this isn't a LEO ad, this provider or scammer is profoundly bad at ad writing". I still don't know if the ad's legit, truth be told. Your own researches now make me think setup, just because I haven't seen so many red flags in a single ad since the Flagler sting (this one was verified LEO):

https://web.archive.org/web/20210617...n/027794812280

Anyway, the premise holds. I can't imagine a monger in their right mind who would contact that ad. And the author, whoever it was, is still profoundly bad at ad writing!

https://escortalligator.com.listcraw...ytona/68313087

Cheers!