Thread: Boston Top Ten
Closed Thread
Results 106 to 120 of 3380
-
11-09-23 13:18 #3275
Posts: 35Rolling stone article
Hello Boston brothers,
Just wanted to post a rolling stone article. With a former federal prosecutors take on the underlying reasons behind it. Noteworthy that he explicitly says the amount of resources devoted to SW that was not involuntary caught my eye as well as what he believes. I don't think the owners / management would be dumb enough to try and extort powerful clients but I do have could believe that some of these really high level people mentioned repeatedly are feared to be vulnerable to being compromised etc.
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/...234873115/amp/
Stay safe.
-
11-09-23 13:10 #3274
Posts: 301Originally Posted by MaggicMikeXX2 [View Original Post]
With k-orgs you can play with the girl before paying - no undercover policewoman is going to dress up as a sexy Korean girl let alone let you touch them. Money is on the table. No words are exchanged. Those are the three obstacles that a sting solves. They record you agreeing to a sex act for money, they witness you giving money (the policewoman or surveillance testifies to this. An actual Korean prostitute will not), and they testify on the furtherance of the act (getting in a car, entering a room, etc.). This is why police have to stick to this script in 99% of cases, and how they manage 70,000 arrests a year. It is not from hiding in the closet without you or the girl knowing and watching everything. If they managed that, it would only work exactly one time before their cover is blown and the owner is alerted. That is just not going to happen because it is truly a waste of LE's time and doesn't catch their real target.
-
11-09-23 13:00 #3273
Posts: 301Thoughts
Hi, I posted the Boston case yesterday morning in the Los Angeles / OC threads in California, since one arrested was from Torrance:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...=1#post6670395
Some fun notes:
The most expensive apartment rented was $3,664, and the owners often paid by turning cash into money orders and using the money orders to pay bills and rent. Pretty smart actually! Specifically, Hana sent over $600,000 in money orders, broken up to under $3000 orders so she would not have to show I'd (there is a legal requirement apparently). I can confirm I didn't have to show I'd for money small orders.
They went out of their way to emphasize this is a high end brothel with high end customers charging (relatively) top dollar. Not sure why but they repeated variations of this many times.
For context, back when marijuana was illegal in all 50 states the USA arrested 800,000 people per year for marijuana! In comparison, the USA arrests 70,000 per year for prostitution. The K-orgs are a tiny fraction of this. The arrests are stings and streetwalkers generally, because that's the only way you can make a ton of arrests. If you were try to make an arrest with incall, you get one chance and then your cover is blown (with a sting, your undercover agent just sets up and does it again). Years ago when they busted the Seattle K-org ring, it didn't go much beyond that. Now there are 10 times as many K-orgs as since then. So while there will always be this risk, it is going to go as well as their war on marijuana did. Individuals will suffer, but the industry will just keep growing.
Note that California recently passed and Newsom signed a law preventing police from detaining women for loitering (to investigate them for streetwalking), partly because a few innocent women were also being caught up and harassed by police. So now there are a lot of streetwalkers in California again. I'm for 100% legalization but I'm surprised at this development, here in Socal we post reports on these women just for fun, not even to see them (I wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot pole when I can just go to a K-org). What a time to be alive.
-
11-09-23 12:55 #3272
Posts: 29Originally Posted by Spill [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 12:55 #3271
Posts: 354Admin delete my account
Can an admin delete my account.
-
11-09-23 11:49 #3270
Posts: 1056Originally Posted by Flyguy1980 [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 11:45 #3269
Posts: 49Against the club. I agree. But as they stated,"the investigation is still in its early stages". I'd tie up any loose ends if it was up to me though.
Originally Posted by Bran001 [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 11:43 #3268
Posts: 223Really
So you know for a fact that women were not forced into doing this. Many have to do this to pay off family debts. Before you start spouting off inaccurate information do some research. By the way I used agency and provided information I now regret. Never again will I provide DL or photo.
Originally Posted by Hyperion11 [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 11:39 #3267
Posts: 130Originally Posted by BobORama [View Original Post]
And another note, BTT was asking for so much personal data to verify you, and it didn't help them in the end. So hopefully other agencies learn this. Although I doubt we'll have another agency opening shop in the area.
Why the f* aren't feds doing something really useful instead of this shit? None of the girls were forced into this, none were underage (actually the opposite, some were too old LOL! So much crime in this country and they spend their time with this?
-
11-09-23 10:54 #3266
Posts: 85Miranda rights
Originally Posted by CCChunks [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 10:37 #3265
Posts: 702Originally Posted by PaulRew [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 10:36 #3264
Posts: 702Originally Posted by Hamsd [View Original Post]
No one other than the prosecutors know if they'll "go after" clients. That depends on a lot of factors outside of the law per se. Do the prosecutors see political gain for doing so? Do the prosecutors think that they'll meaningfully deter such activities in the future if they do "name and shame" customers? No one knows.
I'm sure there's a LOT of anxiety right now. Feels awful I am sure. Take care of yourself.
-
11-09-23 10:31 #3263
Posts: 702Originally Posted by IrishPlaya [View Original Post]
-
11-09-23 10:09 #3262
Posts: 30Originally Posted by PaulRew [View Original Post]
Feds are involved because they used the USPS and the crossing of state lines. But anything else will fall within the respective states jurisdiction. In MA, they have to catch you IN THE ACT in order to make the charge stick. A text or a name on a list alone isn't enough. Any lawyer worth their salt can shred that to pieces for a defense.
If the Feds wanted you, they would have taken you by now.
Here's how it will most likely play out.
They will plead out. Money Laundering and Tax Evasion + Prison Time.
It's hard to make Sex Trafficking stick when they got paid / fed and could have left at any time.
Just stay calm, don't get in your head about it and remember that anytime LEO askes you questions. You STFU and invoke your right to remain silent and ask for your attorney.
-
11-09-23 09:22 #3261
Posts: 146Xoc
What happened to xoc? I wasnt in the club with them but seem to be the same case?