click for FREE hookups
Rubrankings.com
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
click for FREE hookups
Ava Escorts

Thread: Boston Top Ten

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 226 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 3380
This blog is moderated by BarebakRussian
  1. #3380
    Banned Member


    Posts: 1036

    Future Posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Admin2  [View Original Post]
    No bullshit, it's over, anybody who brings it up gets banned. If you ever receive a summons for anything call a fucking lawyer, nothing, ab so fucking lutly nothing you read here by one of these internet lawyers will help you. I've been doing this shit for years, they do all that shit to scare guys but nothing will happen.

    I'm not bullshitting the next person who brings it up is gone.

    A2
    As someone who went through this many years ago, I actually found the Denny Crane Wannabes' Posts entertaining. Since you now have made this Statement, is there really a need for this thread? Just asking! Seems like the only thing now allowed to Post, would be News updates on the case.

    Thank you, I never knew that "Boston Top Ten" and "BTT" were the same thing. I thought this was something like the top ten places in Boston and it was being dominated by this theme.

    Thank you, I will close the thread.

    If any of you knuckleheads start this shit on another thread I will ban you. There will be no further warnings, bring it up get banned.

    A2

  2. #3379
    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.

  3. #3378
    Quote Originally Posted by Admin2  [View Original Post]
    No bullshit, it's over, anybody who brings it up gets banned. If you ever receive a summons for anything call a fucking lawyer, nothing, ab so fucking lutly nothing you read here by one of these internet lawyers will help you. I've been doing this shit for years, they do all that shit to scare guys but nothing will happen.

    I'm not bullshitting the next person who brings it up is gone.

    A2
    Hallelujah!! Thank you!

  4. #3377
    Administrator


    Posts: 4919

    It's over

    No bullshit, it's over, anybody who brings it up gets banned. If you ever receive a summons for anything call a fucking lawyer, nothing, ab so fucking lutly nothing you read here by one of these internet lawyers will help you. I've been doing this shit for years, they do all that shit to scare guys but nothing will happen.

    I'm not bullshitting the next person who brings it up is gone.

    A2

  5. #3376
    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

  6. #3375
    Quote Originally Posted by MABooster  [View Original Post]
    Yo are fun. Based on your record, you also visited BTT several times.
    Incorrect. I was _close_ though. I tried to get in with references and considered faking some papers, but that was as close as I got.

  7. #3374
    Quote Originally Posted by Viger99  [View Original Post]
    This is not helpful and you are completely wrong. You should go and educate yourself on Canada Bill C-36.
    I use to travel to Montreal regularly for work and would have the agency girls to my room every night while I was there. If it wasn't legal one would never know. All you had to do was pick out the girls from a line up and call in the time. Best $180-200/ hr ever spent whenever I was there.

  8. #3373
    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.

    The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.

  9. #3372
    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.

  10. #3371

    Angels?

    Did ma angels get busted too? Their site is gone.

  11. #3370
    Regular Member


    Posts: 12
    Damn, I'm on a business trip to DC and was just about to go to the Tyson's corner location. Happen to come across this bust, and came here to inform everyone about BTT, but seems like everyone knows already.

  12. #3369
    Quote Originally Posted by KashkaiBoy  [View Original Post]
    I hear what you're saying and generally I agree that overall the challenge prosecutors face to bring charges against johns is pretty high. What seems different here is that they were monitoring the organization for more than a full year. I can't imagine that they weren't able to gather the basic evidence to close it down and charge the local actors after a couple of weeks of gumshoe and getting search warrants for bank info and phone records. So what were they waiting for? Either they are trying to get more info higher up the chain (given that organizations like BTT are part of bigger Korean mafia syndicates that are based in Korea). Or maybe they have an interest to do what they keep saying that they want to do, which is build up some charges against johns, to be able to say that they are upping the ante on stopping trafficking etc. They are the ones that are hinting at this. But maybe you're right and it's just a lot of talk. I'm just saying that the profile of this bust seems different from BAD and others we have read about. But we'll just have to see.
    This is the Bad news article. Same MO from the Feds / State.

    When the Feds pull the trigger, they don't want to miss which is why they take their time.

    Nothing I say will change the anxiety level, I get it.

  13. #3368
    I hear what you're saying and generally I agree that overall the challenge prosecutors face to bring charges against johns is pretty high. What seems different here is that they were monitoring the organization for more than a full year. I can't imagine that they weren't able to gather the basic evidence to close it down and charge the local actors after a couple of weeks of gumshoe and getting search warrants for bank info and phone records. So what were they waiting for? Either they are trying to get more info higher up the chain (given that organizations like BTT are part of bigger Korean mafia syndicates that are based in Korea). Or maybe they have an interest to do what they keep saying that they want to do, which is build up some charges against johns, to be able to say that they are upping the ante on stopping trafficking etc. They are the ones that are hinting at this. But maybe you're right and it's just a lot of talk. I'm just saying that the profile of this bust seems different from BAD and others we have read about. But we'll just have to see.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bosnas  [View Original Post]
    The state / feds only name and shame when they press charges. Otherwise, you're just slandering someone without any proof. The media has always called for the client lists, that hasn't changed. There's a reason why the Fed's were cagey about sharing the names, it's because the state needs to be the one to level charges. The only exception would be the ones with Federal Security clearances. Those people fucked themselves on that one.

    If someone blindly shared a list and a media outlet shared it, then the slander lawsuit would be a slam dunk.

    The Heidi Fless list was because she shared it after she got out of jail. Not because the authorities shared it.

    The Maine Zumba list was shared because they charged all the people on it.

    They called for the lists when Chloe's Companions got busted. Never Happened.

    They called for the lists when bad got busted. Never Happened.

    Any lawyer worth their salt will say this to the prosecutor. Texts and ID's can be faked, Photos can be faked, LinkedIn profiles can be faked. What proof do you have that my client actually solicited sex?

    There's a reason why they have to setup stings for prostitution. They need to catch a person in the act.

  14. #3367

    Think of it this way

    The state / feds only name and shame when they press charges. Otherwise, you're just slandering someone without any proof. The media has always called for the client lists, that hasn't changed. There's a reason why the Fed's were cagey about sharing the names, it's because the state needs to be the one to level charges. The only exception would be the ones with Federal Security clearances. Those people fucked themselves on that one.

    If someone blindly shared a list and a media outlet shared it, then the slander lawsuit would be a slam dunk.

    The Heidi Fless list was because she shared it after she got out of jail. Not because the authorities shared it.

    The Maine Zumba list was shared because they charged all the people on it.

    They called for the lists when Chloe's Companions got busted. Never Happened.

    They called for the lists when bad got busted. Never Happened.

    Any lawyer worth their salt will say this to the prosecutor. Texts and ID's can be faked, Photos can be faked, LinkedIn profiles can be faked. What proof do you have that my client actually solicited sex?

    There's a reason why they have to setup stings for prostitution. They need to catch a person in the act.

  15. #3366
    Quote Originally Posted by CityboysUp  [View Original Post]
    The problem is that it's hard to know which agencies are operated by one person across multiple state lines.

    This case blew up as big as it did because:

    1. The booker operated in multiple states which drew the attention of the Feds.

    2. It sounds like some of the higher up clientele were extorted for more information. We don't know if this is necessarily true, it might just be a cover for why the Feds are involved.

    3. The bookers were already on the radar because of the excessive amount of money they tried to launder.

    4. The mongers they implicated were part of major public branches of government or part of the military.

    The professions they listed in the affidavit are likely just the 20 people they got to give them information. They state that there are likely hundreds more customers that they don't know about which means they don't have the client list. Can they still get it? Yes. But is the list exposed? Not yet.

    The mongers they have a case against gave up information voluntarily, likely under duress. Those people will probably get outed in one way or another even if they cooperate with the authorities because they have to be identified to testify..
    How many places do we go to rotate girls. I think Angel who was on Beale st and the don't waist your time new own and a hand full of others actually live in the state. So many shop's even walking distance from a couple BTT girls have been around years if not decades. Something put BTT on the radar. BTW I only know of the walking distance after being told by others I never tried to contact them due to the I'd thing. Over the decades I had been to AMPs that did have cameras that were shut down and nothing came of it. Been in this long enough you see a crackdown, everyone laid low for a bit and then it's business as usual. The oldest profession is not ending soon.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Best Escorts
Sex Vacation




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape