Thread: Boston Top Ten
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 3380
-
11-19-23 12:24 #3380
Posts: 1036Future Posts
Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]
Thank you, I never knew that "Boston Top Ten" and "BTT" were the same thing. I thought this was something like the top ten places in Boston and it was being dominated by this theme.
Thank you, I will close the thread.
If any of you knuckleheads start this shit on another thread I will ban you. There will be no further warnings, bring it up get banned.
A2
-
11-19-23 01:44 #3379
Posts: 75[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.
-
11-19-23 00:01 #3378
Posts: 27Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]
-
11-18-23 22:13 #3377
Posts: 4922It's over
No bullshit, it's over, anybody who brings it up gets banned. If you ever receive a summons for anything call a fucking lawyer, nothing, ab so fucking lutly nothing you read here by one of these internet lawyers will help you. I've been doing this shit for years, they do all that shit to scare guys but nothing will happen.
I'm not bullshitting the next person who brings it up is gone.
A2
-
11-17-23 01:17 #3376
Posts: 24[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!
-
11-16-23 01:03 #3375
Posts: 646Originally Posted by MABooster [View Original Post]
-
11-15-23 21:19 #3374
Posts: 614Originally Posted by Viger99 [View Original Post]
-
11-15-23 20:45 #3373
Posts: 85[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because it contributed nothing of value and in fact constituted a complete waste of bandwidth.
The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange if information between men on the subject of finding women for sex. Let's stick to the subject.
-
11-15-23 10:46 #3372
Posts: 115[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because it appeared to be a public effort to discourage members from posting information. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.
-
11-14-23 12:58 #3371
Posts: 68Angels?
Did ma angels get busted too? Their site is gone.
-
11-13-23 21:59 #3370
Posts: 12Damn, I'm on a business trip to DC and was just about to go to the Tyson's corner location. Happen to come across this bust, and came here to inform everyone about BTT, but seems like everyone knows already.
-
11-13-23 18:42 #3369
Posts: 30Originally Posted by KashkaiBoy [View Original Post]
When the Feds pull the trigger, they don't want to miss which is why they take their time.
Nothing I say will change the anxiety level, I get it.
-
11-13-23 18:08 #3368
Posts: 67I hear what you're saying and generally I agree that overall the challenge prosecutors face to bring charges against johns is pretty high. What seems different here is that they were monitoring the organization for more than a full year. I can't imagine that they weren't able to gather the basic evidence to close it down and charge the local actors after a couple of weeks of gumshoe and getting search warrants for bank info and phone records. So what were they waiting for? Either they are trying to get more info higher up the chain (given that organizations like BTT are part of bigger Korean mafia syndicates that are based in Korea). Or maybe they have an interest to do what they keep saying that they want to do, which is build up some charges against johns, to be able to say that they are upping the ante on stopping trafficking etc. They are the ones that are hinting at this. But maybe you're right and it's just a lot of talk. I'm just saying that the profile of this bust seems different from BAD and others we have read about. But we'll just have to see.
Originally Posted by Bosnas [View Original Post]
-
11-13-23 17:22 #3367
Posts: 30Think of it this way
The state / feds only name and shame when they press charges. Otherwise, you're just slandering someone without any proof. The media has always called for the client lists, that hasn't changed. There's a reason why the Fed's were cagey about sharing the names, it's because the state needs to be the one to level charges. The only exception would be the ones with Federal Security clearances. Those people fucked themselves on that one.
If someone blindly shared a list and a media outlet shared it, then the slander lawsuit would be a slam dunk.
The Heidi Fless list was because she shared it after she got out of jail. Not because the authorities shared it.
The Maine Zumba list was shared because they charged all the people on it.
They called for the lists when Chloe's Companions got busted. Never Happened.
They called for the lists when bad got busted. Never Happened.
Any lawyer worth their salt will say this to the prosecutor. Texts and ID's can be faked, Photos can be faked, LinkedIn profiles can be faked. What proof do you have that my client actually solicited sex?
There's a reason why they have to setup stings for prostitution. They need to catch a person in the act.
-
11-13-23 15:46 #3366
Posts: 2034Originally Posted by CityboysUp [View Original Post]