Thread: Korean Agency PSE / BBFS
+
Add Report
Results 3,196 to 3,210 of 4980
-
01-29-22 10:34 #1785
Posts: 450Shills
Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]
-
01-29-22 01:42 #1784
Posts: 281Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]
If you booked an HR and left with 25 minutes to spare, you gave up 125 so you wouldn't spend an additional 20 (sunk cost notwithstanding). Lol
-
01-28-22 22:07 #1783
Posts: 25So hopefully this is my last little bit about VAC. Attached are the messages VAC sent me on TER, I haven't responded to VAC nor do I plan to. I still have my texts with with the booker showing my booking with Roa, but not going to upload those here. TER mods or admin haven't tried to contact me and if it gets taken down or banner put up disputing it, oh well but I think it should be known if VAC don't like your review they may try the same thing. About my review score, they are charging a premium so I expect more. If not I would go somewhere else and pay half for the same service. Not going to doubt the other reviews where they rated her highly it just wasn't my experience. I have nothing to gain from giving a bad rating and after this I doubt I will post any more bad reviews. Sharing my point of view, but as always YMMV.
-
01-28-22 21:58 #1782
Posts: 25VAC situation
So hopefully this is my last little bit about VAC. Attached are the messages VAC sent me on TER, I haven't responded to VAC nor do I plan to. I still have my texts with with the booker showing my booking with Roa, but not going to upload those here. TER mods or admin haven't tried to contact me and if it gets taken down or banner put up disputing it, oh well but I think it should be known if VAC don't like your review they may try the same thing. About my review score, they are charging a premium so I expect more. If not I would go somewhere else and pay half for the same service. Not going to doubt the other reviews where they rated her highly it just wasn't my experience. I have nothing to gain from giving a bad rating and after this I doubt I will post any more bad reviews. Sharing my point of view, but as always YMMV.
-
01-28-22 21:27 #1781
Posts: 464Yes
But in your case the reviewer was joining in the request to remove the review. Look at the recent Alexandra Belle thread on where a reviewed said she was over 50 years old when she's clearly under 40, and maybe as young as 30. No matter what she did, they wouldn't remove the review.
Originally Posted by HpyGolky [View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 17:50 #1780
Posts: 581It's been done before.
Originally Posted by DCGrind [View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 17:38 #1779
Posts: 464Disputed Reviews
I agree that TER has begun adding a header that says "Provider disputes review" in the past year. However, I've never seen that at a KGirl agency. It's generally when a very established provider can satisfy Admin that either (1) she never scheduled a session with the reviewer, or (2) the review describes services that the Provider expressly disclaims in her ads and which have never been mentioned in her prior reviews.
TER is not exactly friendly with / to KAgencies. For example KGirls who work at agencies and KAgencies themselves are prohibited from giving Whitelists. And carefully monitors KAgencies from shilling. One of the popular agencies here in Vegas was banned a year ago for shilling and offering review discounts. Another is currently being monitored for shilling.
So I think the OP's premise that his review might be removed is wrong. And I tend to agree with Happy that the OP's review is a bit harsh.
Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 16:39 #1778
Posts: 2791Originally Posted by DCGrind [View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 15:30 #1777
Posts: 581With all due respect
Originally Posted by MonLies555 [View Original Post]
I think you're out of line with the 3 score for performance.
You got a nice DFK, the BBBJ was pretty decent. You did a few positions.
And a second pop was negotiated to 20, ok that's not a real deal breaker. I just think you're being a little hard on the review. To me, maybe a "5/6". ? But not a "3".
I can't say for looks because that's very subjective.
-
01-28-22 13:50 #1776
Posts: 464What have they done. . .
To get your review removed? I've never heard about that before. I've been on TER since 2008 and the only way that a provider can get a review removed is the session didn't happen. In that case Admin will contact the reviewer and ask for copies of texts to prove that you scheduled the session. If you provide those then the review stands. Will never take down a review just because the provider disputes the quality or terms of the review. Neither will take down a review where the provider contends that the review describes services (I. E. , BBFS, cims, anal, etc) that the provider doesn't offer. So, can you share with us the communications you've received from them regarding your review? Thanks.
Originally Posted by MonLies555 [View Original Post]
-
01-28-22 11:20 #1775
Posts: 2791Roa
Originally Posted by MonLies555 [View Original Post]
-
01-27-22 23:15 #1774
Posts: 25So it seems VAC is trying to get my review of Roa taken down on ter. I had no plans to continue using them but this just gives me even more reason not to bother with them.
-
01-27-22 17:48 #1773
Posts: 10Hi new here to LV, I was wondering if someone can PM me or give me some details about VAC. I know there's a screening process and such but can someone give me some details about how it works. Also if I'm wanting to do a incall is it at a hotel or a house if anyone could help me I appreciate it in advance! PM me please thank you.
-
01-26-22 23:42 #1772
Posts: 25Prices only go up
At VAC and cll within the last 6 months BBFS went from 380 to 400, ltlv has been at 400 the longest I think. In my last couple experiences the girls at VAC are also charging extra for msog.
-
01-26-22 20:48 #1771
Posts: 464Vac
I don't think VAC has ever been less than 400 for BBFS. They do GFE / cfs for 300. The only up charge I've ever heard of was some girls charge an extra 40 for msog, and some don't.
Originally Posted by Evolon702 [View Original Post]