Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 751 to 765 of 6337
-
10-05-23 20:10 #5587
Posts: 867K-Girl Orgs in San Diego
Here is a list of known K-Girl Agencies that will occasionally have girls in San Diego or are known to cycle girls here. The same girl may pop up on different agencies, as we have recently seen. So pick your fave booker if she's on multiple listings. This listing is provided as your starting point and the usual warnings about pics applies. Some websites show rates, ages, more info. This is not an endorsement of any agency.
https://www.yourlollygirls.com/sandiego
https://topangels.ch/all-angels/
https://www.thetopgirls.com
https://www.sweetasiangem.com/san-diego
https://get9irl.com/index.php?route=...ategory&path=2
https://www.candygirlla.com
https://www.cakdolls.cr/sd/
-
10-05-23 18:51 #5586
Posts: 128SDAG on the Decline
It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.
For example, Rachel has great sensual service. But admittedly she does not look like the pictures provided and she even is older. Which is honestly not a problem, but SDAG has been operating on shady principles to draw up business.
* Posting up photoshopped or completely fake pictures.
* Falsifying details (let's be real, most of those girls are NOT in their 20's).
* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).
* Sending shills to post on these boards (pretty sure one of them was the booker too).
And now they're hitting all new lows by threatening retaliation against customers for posting low scores. That is just unacceptable.
I admire the fact that the booker is on the side of the provider, but he should only do so if the provider can provide the right level of service. Like Yoji, Dallas, Jaine, etc. Are all fantastic girls. But stop upselling garbage girls or less attractive girls. If they don't have what it takes, lower their rates so they can make more on volume. Don't inflate these provider's egos, if they're not hot enough, they shouldn't be pampered.
-
10-05-23 17:46 #5585
Posts: 683It's a lose-lose only in short term imo
In the long term, maybe the booker apologizes and stops harassing and threatening customers. At the very least I'd hope he learned his lesson. And this debacle can be used to deter other orgs from doing the same.
And I disagree. You are saying "do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time."
No! They messed up when they instituted the policy, not when they got caught posting it publicly. I've canvassed many people throughout the years and many have told me the same thing about this place. If they (the agency) are proud of their policy and really believe in it, why hide it? Wear it proudly. Post it publicly.
The agency wants to have their cake and eat it too.
If the only thing they're sorry about is them accidentally posting it publicly, then they haven't learned their lesson. Which is. Let customers write any reviews they'd like to write provided they are honest and truthful. How hard is that? If they are so good as people say they are why do they need to silence people?
Originally Posted by Laf85 [View Original Post]
-
10-05-23 17:39 #5584
Posts: 295Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]
Visited Chichi recently, she is curvy with big boobs for an Asian, English not too good (even compared to the Korean girls), loves having her tits sucked. Seems new. So pros and cons. Also it's in MV not UTC if that's a factor. But much simpler parking situation (lots of free 1 hour parking outside) and a straightforward gate unlike FEC. I was even thinking to go FEC but I guess I'm getting lazy when I think I'll have to try three ways just to get in.
Hope this helps.
-
10-05-23 17:36 #5583
Posts: 43Originally Posted by M4473 [View Original Post]
-
10-05-23 17:02 #5582
Posts: 43Jupiter?
Rank.
Jessica.
Mimi.
Jupiter.
Cheri.
Fec girl.
Rate 1 -5.
The order you would grab them.Last edited by Clclcl; 10-05-23 at 17:51. Reason: Erroe
-
10-05-23 16:34 #5581
Posts: 867Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]
-
10-05-23 11:47 #5580
Posts: 1747Originally Posted by SoapieFreek [View Original Post]
-
10-05-23 11:32 #5579
Posts: 221SDAG is trying to do damage control (based on their club post) but is it too late. My advice to them is to acknowledge a mistake was made, start over with a new domain, stop pressing people for good reviews, have Alex (if still there) work on his soft skills. I would hate to see them fold.
Originally Posted by SoapieFreek [View Original Post]
-
10-05-23 09:56 #5578
Posts: 13SDAG might have learned the hard way. Ask the Expert is gone from sight
Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.
-
10-04-23 22:19 #5577
Posts: 295Originally Posted by Laf85 [View Original Post]
And I'm not the only one, just today on HX Lollygirls sent out their mass spam ad and even posted TER ids for their two girls. I looked them up and Jessica literally has 30 reviews, 29 of them 7 through 10. Mimi only has 3 reviews and they're 8's. Even accounting for shills there aren't any big complaints. She wouldn't be working if it was common.
All I'm saying is even if half the reviews are fake shills, it is not unbelievable to me that girls would get 90%-95% 7 to 10 ratings. Because I personally would have rated 29 out of 30 girls the same. I also don't pay much attention to review numbers anyways, other than to read the reviews and get a general idea of the basic facts. I do think people should be free to post honest reviews of course. Wait a few days to post if you have concerns.
I want to close by saying even in countries where this is completely open and legal, the service is usually not as good. Sometimes cheaper. They are importing the right girls.
-
10-04-23 20:28 #5576
Posts: 13Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]
I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!
-
10-04-23 17:30 #5575
Posts: 137That escaleted quickly.
Originally Posted by Jstwntlvn1 [View Original Post]
-
10-04-23 17:27 #5574
Posts: 224SDAG should be banned from the USASG for life!
Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]
TER made the right call, just like Admin would be here, banning this type of BS business model which basically mandates that every single member here to write a BS shill review for every single 1 of their ladies, regardless of whether they provide horrible service, or not. < Somebody here please explain to me why this fucking BS should be tolerated!?
Once again, SDAG policy mandate, quote:
"ASK THE EXPERT.
We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.
Some ladies you are going to love.
Some ladies you are going to like.
Some ladies are just ok.
Some ladies you aren't going to match with.
Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.
* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.
If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.
Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.
We will do our best to figure out who you are.
Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.
8 or higher.
If you don't then tell the assistant. ".
Could you imagine, had an AMP had the audacity to mandate this type of threatening mandate / policy against it's customers!? It's a direct order from the business, to shill. Period.
-
10-04-23 16:31 #5573
Posts: 1747Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]