Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 646 to 660 of 6403
-
12-08-23 23:40 #5758
Posts: 407Emily at Sandra99
Originally Posted by NiceTasting [View Original Post]
I say she is not a repeat, and this is the 3rd time I have seen her. I guess I am just hopeful that the next session will be better. She has the ingredients to be something really special, like a Petra, but she just isn't. She is just like every other provider that comes through sandra99. That being said, she is attractive, and I got to pound her hard and I had a great release. But it was a shorter session (no MSOG), I had to concentrate to block out that weird moaning.
I kicked myself for not just taking a short trip to OC to see some of the better options there.
-
12-08-23 21:54 #5757
Posts: 75Damn shame
Originally Posted by DkBruinFan74 [View Original Post]
Anyone else on the fence, definitely check her out, she's awesome and a real sweet cutie.
-
12-08-23 18:49 #5756
Posts: 37Mintzy at FEC
Finally got around to seeing Mintzy. Really cute (and hot) Korean girl next door vibe. Nice natural grabbable body. Good kisser. Good skills. Good conversationalist. Let's you lead the session. Rec from me. She's gone after today.
-
12-08-23 07:57 #5755
Posts: 40Emily at Sandra99
Originally Posted by TempleAvenue [View Original Post]
-
12-07-23 22:08 #5754
Posts: 6Emily Sandra99
Saw Emily again. I love how she looks, although her photos kinda Embelish her tits a bit, I love how hot her face looks. All things said recently are true, Although I kinda wish she DFK'd more, she tries to hug you while fucking so you can't kiss her the whole time. She does kiss every so often, but just not enough engagement. If that doesn't bother you, Go see see her cause she does offer BBFS but the connection could've been better if she just DFK more during the session.
-
12-07-23 11:26 #5753
Posts: 69Is number ending 3663 a good number to reach
Originally Posted by AllCock [View Original Post]
-
12-07-23 01:22 #5752
Posts: 685Originally Posted by TacoManVa [View Original Post]
I said I'm focusing on what is important to me, meaning protecting my monger brothers and ensuring they get correct information and have a voice to share this information without repressions.
As in, the ability to criticize the beauty and service of the said women, freely. And making sure all other brothers hear it, so doing it publicly like on this forum.
But some want to protect businesses and said women from negative reviews or feedback they deserved, suppressing such information. To each their own, like you said.
I'll just say I've never met a monger who said gee whiz I wish I had less information than more information about woman X before I saw her. But I sure as hell met many who wished they had more info. I'm pretty sure that's why mongers are on sites like this.
-
12-07-23 00:35 #5751
Posts: 137Originally Posted by Dolan85 [View Original Post]
-
12-07-23 00:15 #5750
Posts: 248Most important thing in your life?
Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]
But hey, each to his own if the most important thing in your life is TER and reviews go for it brother. Good luck lol
-
12-06-23 06:48 #5749
Posts: 685Seven or less
Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]
https://archive.ph/VfFlw
Nowhere did I say that lack of low reviews means sdag are doing it again. I agree with you there. I merely said TER having the profiles up again doesn't mean that they must have "sorted out" things and now aren't bothering customers.
So. I'm interested to hear from people who have given anonymous negative reviews to their active girls recently. And whether they have received unsolicited text messages from the org / booker after this whole hoopla. I firmly believe in reviews being done by mongers for mongers as datapoints. Reviews aren't for orgs / bookers use. That isn't their lane or jurisdiction. They should be grateful they are able to use positive reviews as revenue source, but instead they take it for granted. Personally I'd want all reviews broadcasted publicly. Especially if it's a negative review, I'd want all my fellow mongers to be aware of such a data point. I care about my fellow mongers, I don't care about girl or org business. And why would anyone if the biz tells them "We will do our best to figure out who you are" if a review is honest?
Anyway. Hope I articulated well the point I was trying to make, LOL.
-
12-05-23 12:24 #5748
Posts: 325Originally Posted by RocketManP [View Original Post]
It's just going to take a while to find a girl I don't like, I mean I remember going to TJ for years. My last experience with a Kgirl was: She let me touch her everwhere, DFK, sucked my cock as long as I liked, 69, multiple positions, sensual massage, shower together. And she was relatively young and attractive. Hard to say between 8 or 9. My last experience 10+ years ago in TJ was: She was more attractive than the other 19 girls but still not comparable to a Kgirl, she lay like a robot as I fucked her, and that was that. She did the absolute bare minimum, didn't even smell good, and I will be polite in saying no more than that. Back then I would have called it a 5. Now with other experiences and compared to Kgirls I would call it a 2. I think there is a scaling problem when you try to compare Kgirls versus Kgirls, instead of Kgirls versus everything else. So I stand by saying 29 out of 30 were 7 or higher.
I do agree if someone finds a girl not to their liking, go ahead and review for us to know. No one should be afraid to speak up. But the lack of low reviews isn't a sign by itself that "something is wrong". I've had one dud in 12 years.
-
12-05-23 08:53 #5747
Posts: 75Originally Posted by ADwightSchrute [View Original Post]
-
12-04-23 21:41 #5746
Posts: 685Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]
As far as them being back on ter being indicative of them changing their ways. Allow me to disagree. They have been on TER for ages while practicing that policy. So I don't see it being indicative of anything.
I'd like to hear any new stories of people publicly writing negative or "seven or less" reviews. That probably would be more indicative. I encourage everyone to watch their policies. And hey if you feel like you've been wronged or they (or any other org for that matter) are up to their old tricks again. Please let me know.
-
12-04-23 18:52 #5745
Posts: 222Gisella from Lollypop
Gisella from Lollypop.
Was able to verify and book easily with the booker. Easy process and set up an appointment early. Gisela's pictures do not do her justice. She is way more beautiful in person. She is about 5 ft and petite with nice mm Cs. Her kitty is shaved with a tattoo on right boo and shoulder. These compliment her really well. She greeted me with a smile and stated with DFK. She has good English and easy to converse with. Shown to room and stated to undress and get comfy. We got comfy with DFK and teasing. She then sat me down on the bed and started an enthusiastic, wet and sloppy BBBJ. This goes for few minutes then 69 allowing me to dine in. She is receptive to everything. After that she hops on CG, RCG, Mish and Doggie. Busted on her, wanted to CIM but it released to fast. She cleaned me up and told me to lay down for a massage. Great firm massage. After a few minutes we go round 2 to a great finish. We laid down for a few minutes to relax and chat. She cleaned me up and brought me to the shower to clean up further. Help me get dressed and shown me out. I will repeat with her. Get her while she's in town.
-
12-04-23 11:12 #5744
Posts: 78Originally Posted by SirBishop [View Original Post]