Thread: Asian PLEASER Reviews only
+
Add Report
Results 406 to 420 of 594
-
07-24-20 02:58 #189
Posts: 1834Solmi
With Kay.
Photos: Probably not her.
Looks: Pretty face, she has a Ayumi Hamasaki-esque look, 5'2", shoulder length hair, decent man made Cs, not much ass, shaven pussy. She has a slender build with good muscle tone on her arms and slim legs but has a wide trunk. She's in great shape and not much tummy at all. However, some girls just aren't naturally gifted with an hourglass figure no matter how much they exercise or diet. Fair skin and no tattoos.
English: While not exactly fluent but almost there.
Attitude: Talkative and aims to please, will ask what positions you like and the sort.
Service: Overall slightly above average. No LFK or DFK whatsoever, just a kiss with closed mouth. Maybe that's due to corona virus. BBBJ was decent, no DT but there was BLS. She was very receptive to DATY but considering the length of time for her to pull back, she's probably faking it. She took control in CG and had her own little solo rodeo which was nice. K9 and mish was just OK. Not much audio feedback outside of DATY.
Expense: $270.
Repeat: No for me. Pretty face but body type didn't do it for me. In addition, better service could be found elsewhere.
-
07-19-20 14:46 #188
Posts: 21Ariel
I ended up seeing Ariel to see what the fuss was about. She was actually better than I expected. Pics aren't her but she is cute and nice playful personality. She is nice and did her best. I was able to cum in her twice. That for me was enough. Her face is better than I expected and the thing everyone is complaining about is not a big deal. I've seen way more girls with worse faces LOL. Bbfscip easy and service was good for me. She didn't have any funk as someone mentioned earlier. Overall I will definitely see her again.
-
07-18-20 23:05
Senior Member
-
07-18-20 16:32
Senior Member
-
07-18-20 14:41
Senior Member
-
07-18-20 12:42
Senior Member
-
07-18-20 11:21
Senior Member
-
07-18-20 06:51 #187
Posts: 399Full Menu Offered. Got Bread and Water
I've been having a devil of a time getting the attention of any booker. Using the number listed in TER for Becky, I called the number for Pepsi Club. Was told she's no longer available, but booker offered Jenny O instead. Still trying to get a foot in the door for this hobby, I agreed and scheduled an early afternoon appointment.
Got to the familiar Mid-Wilshire site. Took the elevator up. And it was all downhill from there.
Jenny O opened up the door and gave me a quick hello before ushering me into her room.
Photos: Her photos on GFE Monkey are more accurate than elsewhere. Still a bit thicker than those photos. Fine with me, I like something to hold on to. But just wait.
Looks: Late 30's-Mid-40's. Clearly more mature than the photos depict.
English: Good enough. I've dealt with worse in my lifetime.
Attitude: Just not into it. From the moment I walked in, she seemed not at all enthused. Was hoping that would change and she would warm up to me.
Service: Poor, by any measure. The gargle. The shower. Straight onto the bed. A half-assed BBBJ, but coupled with some extensive prostate play. At least that was good. But I was finished with a HJ. She made no effort to allow me to cim. Cleaned up, got rolled over for an admittedly good massage. But no rolling back to massage my front. Just hop back into the shower, dress up, and go. At no time was I allowed to touch more than her arms and shoulders. All attempts for any type of kiss was rebuffed. No BBFS (no FS whatsoever), no cim, no cip, no msog, no dfk, no lfk. As matter of fact, those details have now been deleted from her page on Booker Gray's site.
Expense: Standard 260 for the hour. Was expecting some sort of escalation during the session, but it never did. Complained to the booker afterwards, but didn't ask for a refund (price of experience). Got a weak excuse that maybe she wasn't into me. Then she shouldn't have taken my money only to half-ass it. That damages the agency's rep, as well as the girl's.
Repeat: Not just no, I'm questioning if I'm even going to bother with these agencies anymore. They're so selective and secretive, then provide girls who do none of the services advertised. It was my understanding that the premium being paid was to assure some minimum of quality. But if that's not the case, I'm better off taking my chances back in the Valley, in hopes of finding a local bargain for a lot less than what I paid for a glorified hand job.
-
07-18-20 01:07 #186
Posts: 1834Pink / Dana / Shelly. Etc.
Just wanted to add that even January seems to be booking her under the name Arie. No kidding when they said she moves around.
-
07-17-20 18:16 #185
Posts: 235Jamie with Top
Photos: I can see the resemblance, very little photoshop, she is definitely younger looking.
Looks: Late 20's early 30's, some had said Latina body but after seeing Chanel with J it doesn't compare. She is skinny with a little booty but nothing to brag about. Her boobs are good, loved seeing them bounce in cg.
English: we had decent communication.
Attitude: looked like she was just there to get the job done, wouldn't say friendly or anything she said she had a busy day and I had one of the later appointments so maybe she was tired. Did see like 4 Starbucks coffee drinks by the bed so girl was probably running on fumes.
Service: I would say average. DFK was there but not passionate like I like. I tend to let the girl give direction therefore didn't try to force more kissing. We did a couple positions and she obliged. BBBJ was below average after having experienced rika / Sophia before.
Expense: 220 since I opted for the half hour.
Repeat: I know she offers BBFS option but not willing to Pay upcharge for that. Overall I took 30 minutes option because I had a busy schedule so was just there to get in and get out without the extras. I would repeat for the 1 hour option once I have more time.
-
07-17-20 14:49 #184
Posts: 1834Pink aka a bunch of other names
With M.
Photos: It's her. They're older pictures.
Looks: Decent MILF look, soft pillowy natural DDs but with sag, 5'4", average ass, small trimmed landing strip. Slender frame, slight tummy, pale skin tone. Small tattoo on foot. Soft is a very apt description of Pink, skin is remarkably soft but that also be said of her body. There's not much resilience or springiness in her body.
English: Good enough to communicate.
Attitude: Light hearted and friendly.
Service: Overall above average. She's definitely a veteran of the game. And is clearly aware of her assets. She'll sensually brush your entire body with her soft DD's. DFK was ok, BBBJ was slow and sensual with the occasional DT heighten the teasing. She seems to enjoy DATY, but likes it slow and not vigorous. Audio feedback was ok. She gets into in CG, while K9 and mish was good. The highlight was the session is really in FS. She has great control of her kegels and she exercises those muscles to give you maximum stimuli. She'll even pulse a few times after you pop just for good measure. BBFSCIP.
Expense: $260.
Repeat: I would repeat. Overall a nice lay but I would relegate her to plan B or C. What's interesting is that booker Marie has a girl named Shelly using some of Pink's pictures also advertising as BBFS so I wonder if she has left M since.
-
07-17-20 11:38 #183
Posts: 118Carol from booker Tom
Looks: 7/10 - light skinned, average body, about b cup I think. 5'5 in height, I would say late 30's. She's the girl in the picture, but photoshopped like the others.
Attitude: all smiles at the door, took my hand and was giggling most of the time. Hugged me from behind when I was undressing, and told me in broken english that I was cute, I just laughed and like whatever LOL.
Actually surprised didn't ask for money up front LOL.
Service: blue toast, quick shower, had me sit by the edge of the bed, Licked my balls like she misses them, LOL. BBBJ was ok, not too bad, but I appreciate her enthusiasm and really thought she actually enjoyed giving the head LOL. Had me lay on my back, continued giving me head, P2 P right after for a few minutes then asked me for a cover, I honestly didn't know this booker have kgirls doing bare though, I just nodded, and she put on the glove, cowgirl was good, I almost popped and told her to switch, missionary, DATY, pussy tasted good and very soft, no smell down there so we are good, had a good audio feedback from her LOL. Good acting perhaps. Missionary, k9, missionary then popped in the bag, continued to thrust until my junior went limp LOL.
Repeat: yes I will repeat, she was a good lay. And I honestly like this booker, easy to deal with.
-
07-16-20 04:47 #182
Posts: 17Jay: Min Classy Exotic
Photo: Photo on website it's her but heavily photo shop and plus size for 20 pound. Also I remember she was one with another agency like Sexyangel or something. You can tell if you're in this industry.
Look: I'm asian and I can tell you she's around 39-45.
Service: K-MILF with least English. Okay to fucking but not attractive. Good rimming, normal BBBJ. No BBFS.
Expense: 270.
Repeat: nope, giveaway 4/10.
-
07-16-20 03:07 #181
Posts: 44Originally Posted by Andres35 [View Original Post]
But yeah apparently she has sensitive nipples so she doesn't like tit play.
Attitude / service wise she was probably the best for me out of any J girl, at the top with Chanel.
-
07-12-20 02:58 #180
Posts: 38Originally Posted by Andres35 [View Original Post]
-
07-11-20 22:42 #179
Posts: 632Of course.
Originally Posted by Andres35 [View Original Post]
-
07-11-20 18:04 #178
Posts: 9Jazmin. J
Jazmin. J.
Photos: I don't think is her, or too much Photoshop.
Looks: Pretty face, early 30's. Shaven pussy.
English: Good enough for a conversation.
Attitude: I think previous appointments were too hard on her or she was just not into me.
Service: nice DFK, does a good BBBJ. Every time I tried to suck her tits she will push away and signal discomfort so I stopped. Not into rimming or BBFS so I didn't even asked or tried.
Expense: $270.
Repeat: Not for me. You guys have to remember that there are too many variables that will affect your session with any Kgirl so you experience will always be different.
Overall I would rate her 8/10. For this agency I think Cami is the winner. Cami 9. 5/10 for me.
-
07-11-20 18:02
Senior Member
-
07-11-20 02:47
Senior Member
-
07-11-20 02:44 #177
Posts: 1834Ariel
With SA.
Photos: Not her.
Looks: Average face, Jay Leno chin, and I was surprised she had little makeup on (she really needed it too), 5'4", firm with some softness man made D's (they're not really well done, visible scarring along circumference of areola, you can see the contours of the implant and her natural fullness sagging below during CG), no ass to speak of, shaven pussy. She has a slender frame and either birthmarks or bruising near the small of her back. Crooked teeth and she chewed a gum beforehand with a flavor that's familiar but I can't quite place. Either way, wasn't a fan of it.
English: Simple exclamations in English but not much else.
Attitude: Aims to please, can really get into it. Has a silly side to her if you can make her laugh and connect.
Service: Overall above average. DFK was good but I refrained after experiencing that particular off-putting (for me anyways) flavor. Did not go for DATY. I do dry run sniff test teases in the general area before committing to the act but there was some funk going down there so I passed. BBBJ was good, slow and sensual, tried to DT, no BLS. She got really spirited in CG, K9 was a bit more submissive, and mish was decent. She can become quite frisky throughout. Audio feedback was OK. Her goal to make you feel good comes through though. BBFSCIP.
Expense: $260.
Repeat: Not for me. Physical attraction just wasn't there for me. Coupled with that flavor and questionable hygiene, I am going to be one and done for Ariel.
-
07-10-20 16:55
Senior Member
-
07-10-20 08:19
Senior Member
-
07-09-20 21:38
Senior Member
-
07-09-20 20:59
Senior Member
-
07-08-20 01:28 #176
Posts: 632Jazmin.
With CA-KD.
Photos: the photos are definitely real and give a good representation of her. The P.S. Makes her eyes look slightly bigger than they are in real life. That's about it. She looks better than the pics, in my opinion.
Looks: For my tastes, gorgeous. Silky, jet black hair, soft porcelain skin, pretty face. She's pretty short and has a tiny waist, but curves and fun things to grab onto in just the right places (some enhancements have been made, but are well-done and feel natural). Small, peach colored nipples and a bald pussy. She is definitely in her 30's. Early? Mid? Late? It's hard to tell, but it doesn't matter to me when she looks the way she does.
English: Excellent for a kgirl. Communication is easy and she can have a full blown conversation with no problems. She was actually the one to initiate conversation with me.
Attitude: Warm and friendly. She treated me like I was her BF and like she wanted to please me.
Service: Excellent. This was one of the most genuine and convincing GFEs I've had. Either she liked me, or she's a great actress (probably the latter), because she had me fooled. DFK, BBBJ with a lot of eye contact, slurping, and moaning (no full DT, but she definitely flirted and teased me with it), 69, DATY, rimming (on her) P2 P, CFS TF, CIM. Everything from her was full effort and the session was super passionate.
Expense: 270.
Repeat: Hell yes, and soon.
-
07-08-20 00:11
Senior Member
-
07-07-20 22:47
Senior Member
-
07-07-20 00:37
Senior Member
-
07-05-20 23:50 #175
Posts: 5Yebin With TOP GIRLS
Yebin.
With TOP GIRLS.
https://www.thetopgirls.com/jessie
Photos: It's her, some Photoshop on her body. Boobs is not as big as shown in the photo.
Looks: (8. 5 out 10) 24 years old. Cute GND FACE, 5'6" close to 5'7", Natural B's, shaven pussy. Nice pale skin tone, one tattoo on right side cheek of her ass, and average body type. (Not skinny like Ravi).
English: some, can communication in simple English.
Attitude: Aim to please.
Service: Overall above average.
Expense: $260.
Repeat: MAYBE, personal preference is petite girl. Recommend if you like her height.