This blog is moderated by Member #5814
-
Senior Member
Posts: 92
Monthly rental
Originally Posted by
Idusixtyning
[View Original Post]
The rent that Nabi was paying to the landlord was probably way over true market rent too. Maybe 5 figures monthly for the dump. A sign that a lot of unreported cash revenue was involved.
Nirvan and nabi. It was more than 10 K month for that slow location that most people will not visit.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 5
-
Senior Member
Posts: 44
-
Regular Member
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by
CoffeeLatte
[View Original Post]
Anybody knows Linda's contact number. She also worked at Happiness and Rejuve. PM is preferred. Much Mahalo.
Can I get in on that? Linda was my atf.
-
Linda
Anybody knows Linda's contact number. She also worked at Happiness and Rejuve. PM is preferred. Much Mahalo.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 501
Originally Posted by
NightWing24
[View Original Post]
Both you and Craps need slaps. Aw shiet! That just rhymed. But, anyways, landlords do & can get in trouble. To make it simple, if you live in a multiplex or condo, there are "House Rules" to follow while the tenant is on property, if the tenant fails to follow the rules, the landlord is suppose to enforce the rules. Local LEO involvement is optional. In this case however, the landlord may have received some kinna formal notification, and passed the info along to the establishment, in doing so, the landlord saves himself & the establishment from litigation. Because the landlord can be accused of allowing an illegal operation of an establishment on their property. Law enforcement could use something along the lines of RICO. That was invented in the US, BTW. Or they can use a whole bunch of other tactics. So, that's not a bad landlord, that's a good landlord. Not sure how old you and a few mongers are on here, but using common sense against law enforcement, you'll lose each time. Would you guys rather see an establishment raided, girls having their visas revoked, mamas and landlords arrested and charged pending arraignment. Is there not enough of that going around already?
"When the book gets thrown at you, read it and throw the book back. Don't throw it away, Idiot. ".
The rent that Nabi was paying to the landlord was probably way over true market rent too. Maybe 5 figures monthly for the dump. A sign that a lot of unreported cash revenue was involved.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 322
Soleh!
Originally Posted by
Drake678
[View Original Post]
Yaw! Dats rite! Landlord did not commit crime. And the girls didn't do to. All they did was spend time with you. No law against spendin time with company. And if all the girls get there paper work straight then it's a G.
Landlords do & can get in trouble. To make it simple, if you live in a multiplex or condo, there are "House Rules" to follow while the tenant is on property, if the tenant fails to follow the rules, the landlord is suppose to enforce the rules. Local LEO involvement is optional. In this case however, the landlord may have received some kinna formal notification, and passed the info along to the establishment, in doing so, the landlord saves himself & the establishment from litigation. Because the landlord can be accused of allowing an illegal operation of an establishment on their property. Law enforcement could use something along the lines of RICO. That was invented in the US, BTW. Or they can use a whole bunch of other tactics. So, that's not a bad landlord, that's a good landlord. Not sure how old you and a few mongers are on here, but using common sense against law enforcement, you'll lose each time. Would you guys rather see an establishment raided, girls having their visas revoked, mamas and landlords arrested and charged pending arraignment. Is there not enough of that going around already?
"When the book gets thrown at you, read it and throw the book back. Don't throw it away, Idiot. "
-
Senior Member
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by
Craps
[View Original Post]
How? Landlord did not commit a crime.
Tenant may have, but still needs to be proven in a court of law.
IMHO I'm not a lawyer, just common sense.
Happy May have this I mine with a good attorney.
Hope alls goes well
Yaw! Dats rite! Landlord did not commit crime. And the girls didn't do to. All they did was spend time with you. No law against spendin time with company. And if all the girls get there paper work straight then it's a G.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 206
Landlord
Originally Posted by
JapaneseBoy
[View Original Post]
I heard the landlord also can get busted. Get fined &/ or go to jail.
How? Landlord did not commit a crime.
Tenant may have, but still needs to be proven in a court of law.
IMHO I'm not a lawyer, just common sense.
Happy May have this I mine with a good attorney.
Hope all’s goes well
-
Senior Member
Posts: 211
Pretty bummed to hear this place packed up upon returning from an off island trip. Maybe they'll be back rebranded at a later date. One can dream right?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 169
I heard the landlord also can get busted. Get fined &/ or go to jail.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 721
Other opportunities
Originally Posted by
MegaRat
[View Original Post]
Closed and out. But no worries, the girls that still want to work would have likely transferred to other places and only a matter of time before this good forum lets us know. Besides, I have a feeling a new one is going to open up in the same spot. AGAIN!
When one door closes and another opens you're probably in prison.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1096
Reasons
Originally Posted by
NightWing24
[View Original Post]
Maybe the landlord knows something we don't, and is saving them face from being blasted on the news. Never know what dem boys be planning these days with Feds backing them up.
I'm pretty sure it's Nadamoto trying to save face for the city prosecutor's office along with trying to make a name for himself with the upcoming election year. It's that office that is the current driving force behind all the recent AMP closures. They now go after the landlords / land owners to get bigger convictions (felonies) instead of going after the workers themselves (mostly misdemeanor offenses). With no establishment to work out of, the illegal sex business "disappears". Even though we may / may not be able to do private transactions with our ATFs the "business" has no public store front. So in the public's eye "crime" has been deterred. IMHO it was the advertising that had the most impact, both negative and positive, on our AMPs. Hopefully this is one storm that we can withstand. GL!
-
Senior Member
Posts: 322
Rip
Maybe the landlord knows something we don't, and is saving them face from being blasted on the news. Never know what dem boys be planning these days with Feds backing them up.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 279
Closed!
Originally Posted by
Spinnerholic
[View Original Post]
Is Nabi still open? If they are, is Kayla still working there after 3 or 4 pm? I tried calling but no answer.
Closed and out. But no worries, the girls that still want to work would have likely transferred to other places and only a matter of time before this good forum lets us know. Besides, I have a feeling a new one is going to open up in the same spot. AGAIN!