|
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 86
Originally Posted by ApplesLoveMe
[View Original Post]
Saw Natalie from EC last week and wouldn't recommend. Posted my review on the other site but the links expired so can't post, thought I'd share here. Saw that she was well liked and was excited to see her. Walked in and saw a tall blonde with her tit's spilling out of her one piece lingerie. Quick peck and saw her walk away with a nice ass. Was excited and took a shower. The bathroom was pretty messy with towels everywhere. Room was also messy with food all over the place and overall just wasn't a good vibe. Came back out and her energy was just off. She didn't even pretend like she was into the session at all. One of the worst bjs I've received where she'd put it in her mouth, do some things for a bit, then just jerk me for a few seconds staring at the clock and repeated that cycle for a bit. Started getting soft so I just told her to lay on her back while I just jerk off before deciding to finish in mish. Left right away. Overall, pretty disappointed and wished I didn't save a week's load for her. Was basically a dead fish experience, something you'd expect from a high volume quick visit girl. Agency usually has some high quality girls but Natalie wasn't it for me. Last time I'll visit a travelling euro girl as they're all similiar experiences. If you want hot euros, visit the other agency with ECE. Darina specifically in terms of similiar looks of Natalie but with amazing service. Natalie 6 in looks and 4 in performance, Darina looks a 7 and performance a 8. 5.
Also saw Elyse from AC. She's a damn nympho. Wanted 3 loads in her mouth so I delivered with various positions mixed in. Usually not a fan of lip fillers and manmades but they just look perfect on her. Think she's super hot and sultry. Looks 9 performance 10.
I agree Elyse is great, but damn I don't know how you guys do 3 loads in one session. I'm jealous. I get one and I'm done for the day.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 130
Hi all
Been lurking after curiosity and the hobby itch took over ha. Mixed sentiment in the game all around it looks like.
I've been working on some projects and have been wondering if there's interest collaborating: perhaps finding a solution mitigating scams, help keep everyone safe. Feel free to pm me. If I never answered a previous message from you, I owe you a cold one. Let's connect.
Admin—excuse me and forgive my ignorance if this post is against the rules. I'm just writing / proposing as the idea surfaced. I'm going to read further into our resources here. Would love to contribute on a significant level, love this place.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 66
Natalie meh
I saw Natalie as well and agree with the points made in this review. Wouldn't repeat.
Originally Posted by ApplesLoveMe
[View Original Post]
Saw Natalie from EC last week and wouldn't recommend. Posted my review on the other site but the links expired so can't post, thought I'd share here. Saw that she was well liked and was excited to see her. Walked in and saw a tall blonde with her tit's spilling out of her one piece lingerie. Quick peck and saw her walk away with a nice ass. Was excited and took a shower. The bathroom was pretty messy with towels everywhere. Room was also messy with food all over the place and overall just wasn't a good vibe. Came back out and her energy was just off. She didn't even pretend like she was into the session at all. One of the worst bjs I've received where she'd put it in her mouth, do some things for a bit, then just jerk me for a few seconds staring at the clock and repeated that cycle for a bit. Started getting soft so I just told her to lay on her back while I just jerk off before deciding to finish in mish. Left right away. Overall, pretty disappointed and wished I didn't save a week's load for her. Was basically a dead fish experience, something you'd expect from a high volume quick visit girl. Agency usually has some high quality girls but Natalie wasn't it for me. Last time I'll visit a travelling euro girl as they're all similiar experiences. If you want hot euros, visit the other agency with ECE. Darina specifically in terms of similiar looks of Natalie but with amazing service. Natalie 6 in looks and 4 in performance, Darina looks a 7 and performance a 8. 5.
Also saw Elyse from AC. She's a damn nympho. Wanted 3 loads in her mouth so I delivered with various positions mixed in. Usually not a fan of lip fillers and manmades but they just look perfect on her. Think she's super hot and sultry. Looks 9 performance 10.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 126
Elyse
Originally Posted by ApplesLoveMe
[View Original Post]
Saw Natalie from EC last week and wouldn't recommend. Posted my review on the other site but the links expired so can't post, thought I'd share here. Saw that she was well liked and was excited to see her. Walked in and saw a tall blonde with her tit's spilling out of her one piece lingerie. Quick peck and saw her walk away with a nice ass. Was excited and took a shower. The bathroom was pretty messy with towels everywhere. Room was also messy with food all over the place and overall just wasn't a good vibe. Came back out and her energy was just off. She didn't even pretend like she was into the session at all. One of the worst bjs I've received where she'd put it in her mouth, do some things for a bit, then just jerk me for a few seconds staring at the clock and repeated that cycle for a bit. Started getting soft so I just told her to lay on her back while I just jerk off before deciding to finish in mish. Left right away. Overall, pretty disappointed and wished I didn't save a week's load for her. Was basically a dead fish experience, something you'd expect from a high volume quick visit girl. Agency usually has some high quality girls but Natalie wasn't it for me. Last time I'll visit a travelling euro girl as they're all similiar experiences. If you want hot euros, visit the other agency with ECE. Darina specifically in terms of similiar looks of Natalie but with amazing service. Natalie 6 in looks and 4 in performance, Darina looks a 7 and performance a 8. 5.
Also saw Elyse from AC. She's a damn nympho. Wanted 3 loads in her mouth so I delivered with various positions mixed in. Usually not a fan of lip fillers and manmades but they just look perfect on her. Think she's super hot and sultry. Looks 9 performance 10.
Elyse is a dream.
Very repeat worthy.
And great in a duo.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 65
Originally Posted by ApplesLoveMe
[View Original Post]
Also saw Elyse from AC. She's a damn nympho. Wanted 3 loads in her mouth so I delivered with various positions mixed in. Usually not a fan of lip fillers and manmades but they just look perfect on her. Think she's super hot and sultry. Looks 9 performance 10.
Dayumn, 3 loads in one hour? That's crazy!
-
Senior Member
Posts: 71
Natalie EC and Elyse AC
Saw Natalie from EC last week and wouldn't recommend. Posted my review on the other site but the links expired so can't post, thought I'd share here. Saw that she was well liked and was excited to see her. Walked in and saw a tall blonde with her tit's spilling out of her one piece lingerie. Quick peck and saw her walk away with a nice ass. Was excited and took a shower. The bathroom was pretty messy with towels everywhere. Room was also messy with food all over the place and overall just wasn't a good vibe. Came back out and her energy was just off. She didn't even pretend like she was into the session at all. One of the worst bjs I've received where she'd put it in her mouth, do some things for a bit, then just jerk me for a few seconds staring at the clock and repeated that cycle for a bit. Started getting soft so I just told her to lay on her back while I just jerk off before deciding to finish in mish. Left right away. Overall, pretty disappointed and wished I didn't save a week's load for her. Was basically a dead fish experience, something you'd expect from a high volume quick visit girl. Agency usually has some high quality girls but Natalie wasn't it for me. Last time I'll visit a travelling euro girl as they're all similiar experiences. If you want hot euros, visit the other agency with ECE. Darina specifically in terms of similiar looks of Natalie but with amazing service. Natalie 6 in looks and 4 in performance, Darina looks a 7 and performance a 8. 5.
Also saw Elyse from AC. She's a damn nympho. Wanted 3 loads in her mouth so I delivered with various positions mixed in. Usually not a fan of lip fillers and manmades but they just look perfect on her. Think she's super hot and sultry. Looks 9 performance 10.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 65
Originally Posted by DrPepper2976
[View Original Post]
Its not unheard of for people to leave fake reviews to get premium access for a couple of weeks, and if its a good review I doubt the provider would argue against it since it could bring them more business, thanks for the info, we should question reviews that look that weird.
That makes sense! I don't think there's a mechanism that validates if the reviews are written by the person who actually had seen the provider.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 196
Originally Posted by DrPepper2976
[View Original Post]
Its not unheard of for people to leave fake reviews to get premium access for a couple of weeks, and if its a good review I doubt the provider would argue against it since it could bring them more business, thanks for the info, we should question reviews that look that weird.
Suspicious since the poster just registered, only has two posts, and they sound very similar.
Last edited by MidwestHobby; 02-21-24 at 00:23.
Reason: Rechecked links
-
Senior Member
Posts: 130
262 Michelle
TOFTT and went to go see Michelle from 262. Pictures are maybe her from 5 years ago. She's bigger now. Had a great conversation regardless, DFK was a nice touch, no problem with two pops, everything covered. She is enthusiastic / PSE style. Not everyone's cup of tea because she's not as much of a looker as your standard agency girl but as a GFE / PSE style meetup I had a great time. No upcharges brought to my attention.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 310
Originally Posted by Rpark52
[View Original Post]
So, I think I've always taken the reviews at the other place with a grain of salt, usually mentally compiling several together to get a general idea of the provider. I never thought I'd see the day when we started getting fake, clearly AI generated reviews.
For example, here's one: https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...-12jh-2568435. Another by the same user: https://www.theeroticreview.com/revi...-12jh-2569005..
Sometimes I think it could be google translate, but I've now seen enough that I'm like 99% sure it was generated using an AI promt. On one hand, I'm kinda amused by them, but still, how are these approved by their mods?
Anyway, be suspicious of any review with a user name like 12 jh (number number letter letter), as they've all been the same.
Its not unheard of for people to leave fake reviews to get premium access for a couple of weeks, and if its a good review I doubt the provider would argue against it since it could bring them more business, thanks for the info, we should question reviews that look that weird.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 115
Originally Posted by ChiSteele
[View Original Post]
Hmmm. It might also be a google translate of someone not fluent in English, I'm just guessing here of course.
What benefit does AI have by leaving reviews?
I mean, as far as I know it's not an actual robot. It's just someone used some sort of AI prompt to write the review.
Google translate ones are different, I think if you've seen enough of these bad AI prompt responses you can tell the difference.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 5
Annabelle
Originally Posted by Rpark52
[View Original Post]
Looks like the link includes the period at the end of the sentence. So if you click on the link and get the error page, just delete the period and it should work (or it does for me now). Or just go to June's reviews, and look for the one by 12 jh; the 2nd link is a review of Annabelle (indy now, but used to be at Michelle's).
Yeah I was confused by Annabelle's new review because she definitely doesn't do anal LOL.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 65
Originally Posted by Rpark52
[View Original Post]
Looks like the link includes the period at the end of the sentence. So if you click on the link and get the error page, just delete the period and it should work (or it does for me now). Or just go to June's reviews, and look for the one by 12 jh; the 2nd link is a review of Annabelle (indy now, but used to be at Michelle's).
Hmmm. It might also be a google translate of someone not fluent in English, I'm just guessing here of course.
What benefit does AI have by leaving reviews?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 115
Originally Posted by ChiSteele
[View Original Post]
When I click on the links it takes me to page could not be found.
Any other working link?
Looks like the link includes the period at the end of the sentence. So if you click on the link and get the error page, just delete the period and it should work (or it does for me now). Or just go to June's reviews, and look for the one by 12 jh; the 2nd link is a review of Annabelle (indy now, but used to be at Michelle's).
-
Senior Member
Posts: 64
Originally Posted by Lukkylou
[View Original Post]
Brother, don't let the broad defenders get to you. I appreciate honest ratings like yours ten times more than the perfect 10 ratings that get regularly thrown around here. I can honestly say that most of the women I've seen are a 6-7 out of 10 on the real world scale. Now, that doesn't mean that the girls aren't young, cute or a great lay. I prefer the young, slim white cuties over any of the other c#nts, and I will almost always rate them higher than the latinas and Asians. That doesn't mean that I don't put my d#ck in them, the older broads or the occasional black girl, but it's usually just a crave that needs to be satisfied. BUT they have never been so hot that I'd rate them anywhere near a 6 or higher. Some of the fat pigs I see getting reviewed here, you couldn't pay me to even consider. Those broads are at most a 3 on the 10 scale.
Just my honest opinions.
No where did I defend Valentina and whether I think she's attractive or even provides good service.
Her photos simply aren't photoshopped. Quite frankly, her photos doesn't make her that attractive. She's definitely like a 6 out of 10, no where close to like a "hot chick" vibe. My post has simply been pushing back on the idea that it's not a legit photo.
Please read again before defending comments that make zero sense. I'm all for honest opinion. If his opinion was like "her service wasn't great", I'd never respond as that is actually subjective.
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|