Thread: Seeking Arrangement and Other Dating Site Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 1,741 to 1,755 of 5464
-
07-12-21 21:04 #3724
Posts: 1399Downhill?
Idk bro. I've been hearing these complaints all through the years that I've been on there and have enjoyed 100+ successes. I was going like gangbusters when I stopped due to the pandemic in Mar. 2020 and I haven't signed back up yet. Huge investment of time though, in order to keep the investment of money low and your success rate high.
Originally Posted by DadBod78 [View Original Post]
-
07-12-21 20:55 #3723
Posts: 60Originally Posted by MasterLink [View Original Post]
-
07-12-21 20:10 #3722
Posts: 78Still good but not great
Originally Posted by DadBod78 [View Original Post]
The website always required a lot of patience and ability to know how to communicate to these girls. If you treat them with respect and don't be a creep you would be surprised how many of them stay in touch and are willing to please.
I've met a few girls from there who have shown me their accounts and there are like a 100 guys for every 1 girl. The ratio is utterly insane. These girls are getting a million messages and offers.
From time to time if you remain diligent and patient you can strike gold. It's a lot more rare now though.
-
07-12-21 11:50 #3721
Posts: 30SA site gone downhill
Is it just my luck or have you all noticed a decline in the selection of girls on SA? I've used the site on and off for years. I always pay the month, make some contacts, then cancel. Sure, maybe only 1 out of every 20 or so conversations goes anywhere, but it wasn't difficult to find a somewhat normal girl on there. I use the site like a dating app. I try to connect with these girls, spend some time chatting. Get them to actually know and like me and vice versa. Makes it seem less transactional and I often get better prices as a result.
But after taking a long break and trying again, all I get is spammers from far away lands, straight up hookers, and girls who think Jeff Bezos $$$ is on there. Also, far too many women who would have to pay me! (victims of the ugly stick, sloppy fat, or just plain too old).
Has anyone used a traditional dating site discreetly with success? Like made a profile with no face pic and been clear you are essentially looking for a side girl?
Anyway, hope you all are having better luck than me.
-
07-10-21 16:51 #3720
Posts: 5029Originally Posted by ChrisHansen92 [View Original Post]
-
07-10-21 12:49 #3719
Posts: 382I think
If they are premium members they can hide that they viewed you just like we can. It's a feature in settings. You can also set a filter to move any incoming message to kinda a spam section by distance from your listed location. Better yet just hide your profile and message girls you are interested in. Problem solved.
Originally Posted by BigMacDaddy [View Original Post]
-
07-10-21 11:28 #3718
Posts: 5029Originally Posted by Hapcj7 [View Original Post]
-
07-10-21 11:25 #3717
Posts: 5029Originally Posted by BigBoss203 [View Original Post]
As it is now, they pay nothing at all for full access. She's not going to tack on her fee to every date. It's a way to get quality dates for both men and women and could be marketed that way.
Further, if a girl does a hotel incall, say 100 $ For the room, it doesn't get tacked on to every date for that day. So, on SA, if she pays 100 $, it's spread out for the month. The big question is, would the spammers and scammers pay the fee to cheat legitimate people or go away.
-
07-10-21 10:52 #3716
Posts: 408Equal rights
Should they pay the same?
Wouldn't this lead to the girls requesting more money to the sugar daddy? Passing the cost to the consumer.
Would you be okay with this?
Originally Posted by BigMacDaddy [View Original Post]
-
07-10-21 07:13 #3715
Posts: 5029Equal rights
Originally Posted by Hapcj7 [View Original Post]
Charging women, whether full rate or a nominal fee, would clear out most the dead weight, spammers, and scammers. The counter argument would that women wouldn't pay anything to join. Food for thought but something needs to change. The current way is like STG. Anything that's free starts attracting deadbeat scammers. Let the women join like men. No access to the message system until you pay something. At the very least it could reduce the number of deadbeats.
-
07-09-21 22:18 #3714
Posts: 178Agreed!!
Originally Posted by DaReal86 [View Original Post]
-
07-09-21 19:59 #3713
Posts: 5029Originally Posted by DaReal86 [View Original Post]
-
07-09-21 19:29 #3712
Posts: 476SA Bots / fake profiles
Also with the price increase there have also been a lot more fake profiles. This was due to SA removing captcha check aka the prove you're human test before logging in or the select the pictures with motorcycles etc, you guys get the point. Anyway the captcha is used to prevent bots from making fake profiles. Since they've removed it the fake profiles get to run wild and waste your time. Ever hear of the saying "vote with you wallet"? Until something changes or the site is reverted back to using captcha. I would highly recommend against signing up or renewing.
-
07-09-21 15:16 #3711
Posts: 52Seeking more
Seeking Arrangements latest Pushing the overpriced gift lift on the profiles.
-
07-08-21 21:24 #3710
Posts: 5029Originally Posted by DaReal86 [View Original Post]
The one trick to try is to change the top right filter from 'recently active' to 'newest members. ' Lately, you'll be lucky if you see one new female member per day. So, in my 25 to 50 mile radius, there's no point in renewing. I definitely don't want to see all the old stuff already there. The new members generally increase in the Fall and Winter months since there's less to do and the women start getting bored. Well, at least, that's my theory.
BMD.