click for FREE hookups
Organized German FKK Club Tours since 1995
click for FREE hookups
click for FREE hookups
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #5615

    Vixen and Sonya

    Quote Originally Posted by NintyNine  [View Original Post]
    Does vixen even look like her pic here? It seems like she might be a better looking version of Jenny O? What's vixen's face and figure like?

    Also, do you think sonya is as ugly as people say she is? Like check out her pics below. Standing pic makes her look fat, the others look skinny. But those huge nipples are pretty hot. She's listed at only 5'3". With huge tits.

    Which pic even looks like the real sonya? Does her face look old? How would you describe her body? The same typical stocky lumpiness?
    The pic IS Vixen but add 10 years and take beauty face filter off, voice sound like a pack of cig a day, avoid DFK maybe smoke too much that's why.

    She is somewhat small, maybe 5'3 and average body and tits.

    Sonya is not ugly but I would say same age as Vixen, pic is her and body is her, mid to late 30's also like Vixen.

    Body not stocky at all, No CIP that's a drag.

  2. #5614
    Quote Originally Posted by LonerRanger  [View Original Post]
    I have seen a few ladies from M's group and recently saw Megan.

    Megan was the worst from M's group and I would not repeat with Megan.
    Megan is a good looking lady with a nice petite body but her attitude and service were lacking.
    Megan didn't really put much effort during our time together.
    She made me do the "work" no dfk, 20 seconds on BBBJ.
    She wasn't very friendly or outgoing which made the time very awkward.
    It was $300 down the drain.
    I wouldn't say Megan is petite at all personally, but that's me. Glow (IMO) is petite, but Megan, not so much. That said, when I saw Megan a few months ago her service definitely has gone down but I suppose that's normal given the work they do and how much shit they have to take from customers.

  3. #5613
    Quote Originally Posted by LonerRanger  [View Original Post]
    I have seen a few ladies from M's group and recently saw Megan.

    Megan was the worst from M's group and I would not repeat with Megan.
    Megan is a good looking lady with a nice petite body but her attitude and service were lacking.
    Megan didn't really put much effort during our time together.
    She made me do the "work" no dfk, 20 seconds on BBBJ.
    She wasn't very friendly or outgoing which made the time very awkward.
    It was $300 down the drain.
    Megan became "pre madonna" at some point. She was one of the best before. But oh well. Some providers don't keep same attitude.

  4. #5612

    Is Megan the best from M's group.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scribwal  [View Original Post]
    Trying to decide who to see this weekend. Is Megan the best from M's group?
    I have seen a few ladies from M's group and recently saw Megan.

    Megan was the worst from M's group and I would not repeat with Megan.
    Megan is a good looking lady with a nice petite body but her attitude and service were lacking.
    Megan didn't really put much effort during our time together.
    She made me do the "work" no dfk, 20 seconds on BBBJ.
    She wasn't very friendly or outgoing which made the time very awkward.
    It was $300 down the drain.

    ****************

    Cona has a great attitude and really tries to make you feel special.
    Service and attitude were great.
    I will be seeing Cona on a regular basis.

    ************

    Chanel was another great time.
    Chanel is taller than your typical short / petite Korean lady and has a nice ass.
    She has a good attitude and is very friendly.
    Chanel is a repeat for me.

    ************************
    The two other I saw are now gone, they are probably in the bay area.
    But they were both better service and attitude than Megan.

  5. #5611

    Angel at M's

    I saw Angel at M's the other day.

    The pictures if you can get them are sort of representative but also totally not. The pictures look like her totally photoshopped along with being 10 years older.

    I had a good time with Angel. I thought her BBBJ was excellent. However it is really soft and wet so is more sensual than really there to get you off. There was absolutely no sign of teeth and I just really liked it. However I chose to finish that way the second pop and it was so soft that it almost did not make cross the threshold. Finally she used her hand a bit along with her soft mouth and then finally.

    She is all natural, which is nice. She does have a few extra pounds around her middle so if you are looking for a hard body then maybe she is not for you. She does waste a bit of time in the shower as well. But also made sure I popped twice. She kept trying to keep me going even when I said I need to wait. She waited and then made sure to start again.

    In general she was not very GFE. DFK was non existent until she seemed to be getting into it. But still limited. Fov seemed blocked (she kept her legs closed even when I tried gently to move them) and therefore fiv seemed non existent. I never went there on fiv and gave up on fov. But she was caressing me during that whole exploration of the fov. She was friendly and fun but I just think trying to set her boundaries.

    There has been some discussion here of how the LA guys are bad johns so I will just put my comments out here.

    After a bit of Angel doing some BBBJ on me while I was lying on the bed she came up and I was thinking setting up to do some p2 p. Which she did a little but mostly it was me figuring out she does not kiss much. After a bit she asked "condom?" to which I said "ok". She actually asked me again, "condom?" I said "yes". The condom was on the bed so she got it and then she said "Thank you! I want condom". If it had stopped there I would not be writing this but she kept going on and on with the thank yous and how she wants condoms. My take away is that she does BBFS but does not want to.

    This is a hobby that obviously can cross boundaries of what a person may want but does not know how to stop it.

    I had a nice time with Angel. I am generally not a repeat kind of person but I would not avoid her. However I would not be texting immediately for a repeat as well.

  6. #5610
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyEm  [View Original Post]
    I was great but IT was great as well!
    LOL.

    I'll be adding my two cents regarding Haven in the very near future.

    BC.

  7. #5609
    Quote Originally Posted by Toungsten  [View Original Post]
    Both min and eden have amazing pics. Are they real, or super photoshopped?

    Eden looks legit pretty in those pics.

    Does new top asian ever have any bb girls?

  8. #5608
    Saw haven. She's legit super cute face with nice eyes. Adorable personality. Her emonkey san jose pics are accurate.

    She speaks Chinese too. I asked her how long she plans to stay, she said she doesn't know. Could change on a whim.

    I expected her tits to feel super hard, since she was coming from an A cup when she first started, but they're actually soft and feel nice.

    A bit soft baby fat around the waist, but she's not stocky yet.

    Her ass is perky firm, looks and feels great in doggy and flat doggy the way she raises her ass.

    Moans pretty loud, and says "fuck" a lot- that's adorable.

    And her pussy gets pretty sticky icky wetter creamier the longer you DATYFIV while she fucks your face, and that's when you know to enter. Gave her pussy a gentle FIV+clit massage after dumping my load. A sticky icky wet mess.

    Very good Nice time, especially since we were able to communicate. A visual upgrade compared to Lia.

  9. #5607

    Saturday MAY 18

    M.
    MEGAN........... MDR.
    CHANEL, ANGEL, HAVEN, JULIA.......... WLA.

    SUNNY.
    GLOW, NURI. ............WLA.

    http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com/escorts/
    MIN, EDEN............ WLA.

  10. #5606

    Chanel with Booker M

    Quote Originally Posted by Veni1  [View Original Post]
    I think there has been some confusion on this board regarding Chanel. The reason for this is that there were two gals using the same name, one being booked by M and the other by J. Anyway, it is my understanding that the Chanel that was being booked by M is gone. Both gals had their pics on the monkey site. Just for reference, M's Chanel had an I'd of 448560 on the monkey site; and J's Chanel had an I'd of 507801. Also, J's Chanel has pics on the ca-kdoll site. Two different gals, two different body types.
    Chanel with Booker M is still available.

  11. #5605
    Quote Originally Posted by Veni1  [View Original Post]
    I think there has been some confusion on this board regarding Chanel. The reason for this is that there were two gals using the same name, one being booked by M and the other by J. Anyway, it is my understanding that the Chanel that was being booked by M is gone. Both gals had their pics on the monkey site. Just for reference, M's Chanel had an I'd of 448560 on the monkey site; and J's Chanel had an I'd of 507801. Also, J's Chanel has pics on the ca-kdoll site. Two different gals, two different body types.
    Chanel with M is still here. Available today along with Haven, Angel and Julia in WLA and Megan in MDR.

  12. #5604

    Haven.

    Quote Originally Posted by BacklumChaam  [View Original Post]
    "I was great and I finished w / CIA". LOL. I'll be taking that star way to Haven ASAP!

    BC.
    I was great but IT was great as well!

  13. #5603
    Quote Originally Posted by LilDuk  [View Original Post]
    Vixen does look like her picture. She dyed her hair and changed her name from Sally to vixen. She definitely has a cute butt and I'm sure at least a C cup. She's in her 31.
    I highly doubt vixen is in her early 30's. When you get a good look at her face she's probably in her late 30's and her body fits that age too.

    In terms of her figure, she is relatively petite but she is not fit. Her service is good but she is pretty set in her ways, and distinctly does not like any variation in her routine.

  14. #5602
    Senior Member


    Posts: 413

    Chanel vs Chanel

    I think there has been some confusion on this board regarding Chanel. The reason for this is that there were two gals using the same name, one being booked by M and the other by J. Anyway, it is my understanding that the Chanel that was being booked by M is gone. Both gals had their pics on the monkey site. Just for reference, M's Chanel had an I'd of 448560 on the monkey site; and J's Chanel had an I'd of 507801. Also, J's Chanel has pics on the ca-kdoll site. Two different gals, two different body types.

  15. #5601

    Vixen

    Quote Originally Posted by NintyNine  [View Original Post]
    Does vixen even look like her pic here? It seems like she might be a better looking version of Jenny O? What's vixen's face and figure like?

    Also, do you think sonya is as ugly as people say she is? Like check out her pics below. Standing pic makes her look fat, the others look skinny. But those huge nipples are pretty hot. She's listed at only 5'3". With huge tits.

    Which pic even looks like the real sonya? Does her face look old? How would you describe her body? The same typical stocky lumpiness?
    Vixen does look like her picture. She dyed her hair and changed her name from Sally to vixen. She definitely has a cute butt and I'm sure at least a C cup. She's in her 31.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Sex Vacation
Best Escorts




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape