Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 35,941 to 35,955 of 41555
-
05-19-19 04:50 #5615
Posts: 976Vixen and Sonya
Originally Posted by NintyNine [View Original Post]
She is somewhat small, maybe 5'3 and average body and tits.
Sonya is not ugly but I would say same age as Vixen, pic is her and body is her, mid to late 30's also like Vixen.
Body not stocky at all, No CIP that's a drag.
-
05-19-19 04:16 #5614
Posts: 99Originally Posted by LonerRanger [View Original Post]
-
05-19-19 01:52 #5613
Posts: 1102Originally Posted by LonerRanger [View Original Post]
-
05-19-19 00:52 #5612
Posts: 234Is Megan the best from M's group.
Originally Posted by Scribwal [View Original Post]
Megan was the worst from M's group and I would not repeat with Megan.
Megan is a good looking lady with a nice petite body but her attitude and service were lacking.
Megan didn't really put much effort during our time together.
She made me do the "work" no dfk, 20 seconds on BBBJ.
She wasn't very friendly or outgoing which made the time very awkward.
It was $300 down the drain.
****************
Cona has a great attitude and really tries to make you feel special.
Service and attitude were great.
I will be seeing Cona on a regular basis.
************
Chanel was another great time.
Chanel is taller than your typical short / petite Korean lady and has a nice ass.
She has a good attitude and is very friendly.
Chanel is a repeat for me.
************************
The two other I saw are now gone, they are probably in the bay area.
But they were both better service and attitude than Megan.
-
05-19-19 00:46 #5611
Posts: 118Angel at M's
I saw Angel at M's the other day.
The pictures if you can get them are sort of representative but also totally not. The pictures look like her totally photoshopped along with being 10 years older.
I had a good time with Angel. I thought her BBBJ was excellent. However it is really soft and wet so is more sensual than really there to get you off. There was absolutely no sign of teeth and I just really liked it. However I chose to finish that way the second pop and it was so soft that it almost did not make cross the threshold. Finally she used her hand a bit along with her soft mouth and then finally.
She is all natural, which is nice. She does have a few extra pounds around her middle so if you are looking for a hard body then maybe she is not for you. She does waste a bit of time in the shower as well. But also made sure I popped twice. She kept trying to keep me going even when I said I need to wait. She waited and then made sure to start again.
In general she was not very GFE. DFK was non existent until she seemed to be getting into it. But still limited. Fov seemed blocked (she kept her legs closed even when I tried gently to move them) and therefore fiv seemed non existent. I never went there on fiv and gave up on fov. But she was caressing me during that whole exploration of the fov. She was friendly and fun but I just think trying to set her boundaries.
There has been some discussion here of how the LA guys are bad johns so I will just put my comments out here.
After a bit of Angel doing some BBBJ on me while I was lying on the bed she came up and I was thinking setting up to do some p2 p. Which she did a little but mostly it was me figuring out she does not kiss much. After a bit she asked "condom?" to which I said "ok". She actually asked me again, "condom?" I said "yes". The condom was on the bed so she got it and then she said "Thank you! I want condom". If it had stopped there I would not be writing this but she kept going on and on with the thank yous and how she wants condoms. My take away is that she does BBFS but does not want to.
This is a hobby that obviously can cross boundaries of what a person may want but does not know how to stop it.
I had a nice time with Angel. I am generally not a repeat kind of person but I would not avoid her. However I would not be texting immediately for a repeat as well.
-
05-18-19 18:59 #5610
Posts: 129Originally Posted by JohnnyEm [View Original Post]
I'll be adding my two cents regarding Haven in the very near future.
BC.
-
05-18-19 16:22 #5609
Posts: 768Originally Posted by Toungsten [View Original Post]
Eden looks legit pretty in those pics.
Does new top asian ever have any bb girls?
-
05-18-19 16:11 #5608
Posts: 768Saw haven. She's legit super cute face with nice eyes. Adorable personality. Her emonkey san jose pics are accurate.
She speaks Chinese too. I asked her how long she plans to stay, she said she doesn't know. Could change on a whim.
I expected her tits to feel super hard, since she was coming from an A cup when she first started, but they're actually soft and feel nice.
A bit soft baby fat around the waist, but she's not stocky yet.
Her ass is perky firm, looks and feels great in doggy and flat doggy the way she raises her ass.
Moans pretty loud, and says "fuck" a lot- that's adorable.
And her pussy gets pretty sticky icky wetter creamier the longer you DATYFIV while she fucks your face, and that's when you know to enter. Gave her pussy a gentle FIV+clit massage after dumping my load. A sticky icky wet mess.
Very good Nice time, especially since we were able to communicate. A visual upgrade compared to Lia.
-
05-18-19 14:52 #5607
Posts: 3480Saturday MAY 18
M.
MEGAN........... MDR.
CHANEL, ANGEL, HAVEN, JULIA.......... WLA.
SUNNY.
GLOW, NURI. ............WLA.
http://newtopasia.hotprovider.com/escorts/
MIN, EDEN............ WLA.
-
05-18-19 14:40 #5606
Posts: 234Chanel with Booker M
Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]
-
05-18-19 14:36 #5605
Posts: 3480Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]
-
05-18-19 13:44 #5604
Posts: 112Haven.
Originally Posted by BacklumChaam [View Original Post]
-
05-18-19 12:23 #5603
Posts: 102Originally Posted by LilDuk [View Original Post]
In terms of her figure, she is relatively petite but she is not fit. Her service is good but she is pretty set in her ways, and distinctly does not like any variation in her routine.
-
05-18-19 11:21 #5602
Posts: 413Chanel vs Chanel
I think there has been some confusion on this board regarding Chanel. The reason for this is that there were two gals using the same name, one being booked by M and the other by J. Anyway, it is my understanding that the Chanel that was being booked by M is gone. Both gals had their pics on the monkey site. Just for reference, M's Chanel had an I'd of 448560 on the monkey site; and J's Chanel had an I'd of 507801. Also, J's Chanel has pics on the ca-kdoll site. Two different gals, two different body types.
-
05-18-19 10:22 #5601
Posts: 34Vixen
Originally Posted by NintyNine [View Original Post]