This blog is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by
Anchh
[View Original Post]
I finally managed to get verified with one of the bookers (
bookergray.com) and was looking for provider recommendations. I am leaning towards Lisa, what do you guys think of her. I did search her and found a few reviews, she seems promising. I am into lots of DFK which she seems to be comfortable with, and like girls who are passionate and not just going through the motions. But I am not sure if this is the same Lisa everyone is talking about. Also I am concerned about some folks mentioning her age being mid 30's. I was hoping to see a younger provider, I like petite and shapely girls, breasts on the smaller side. Any other provider on that site that anyone can recommend or should I just stick with Lisa?
Just saw Lisa. Highly recommended. DKF was good but not much tongue. She's shorter. Maybe 5'2" or 5'3". Kind of reminds me a Nana's build, but little shorter and few lbs less. She's got a younger look to her, who knows on exact age. Her deep throat skills are very very good. Did a good round of multiple positions, then had her ride me cowgirl. She O'd four times doing that. After first I was waiting for her to call shower time (was looking over at the clock and noticed ending our time). But she just started grinding some more and started fucking again. On the second O I could feel her dripping. Same thing rested a bit and figured she'd hop off, but keep going. 4th she came it was enough and went to the shower. Her inner thighs were really wet. Wasn't super PSE like Nana, but think she'll be let loose a little more on 2nd visit.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1166
Originally Posted by
Yolo1234
[View Original Post]
I'm screened with the CGLA PO, but not the 2 pop one. I've seen some posts in the forum about how these orgs rep the same girls, and how it's possible to cross-book. Do you guys think its possible to book Sweet Honey (only see her on the 2 pop site), with the CGLA PO?
I got in with 2 pop without question and I do not think they checked my references. This was when they first opened shop. They have similar screening to SAG, a possible connection there. SAG called me but quickly hung up and I booked right after the call. Are you cleared with SAG?
CGLA has the same girls to my understanding, and I find her a more responsive booker. Any girl at CG match the stat of Sweet Honey?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1166
Originally Posted by
Jbjb1983
[View Original Post]
Yea, Daisy told me she won't be back until maybe spring or summer. I'll ask if I see her again before end of today.
I couldn't get it out of her LOL. She just laughed and said it's a vacation. She was becoming a favorite. She said she will return to the org after her break and to not worry, in her chill vibe voice. The younger ones often come and go. Pocket aka Teenie would do the same I remember. The tattoo girl from KTE has been MIA for a while. Sakura was it?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1166
Originally Posted by
IAmGib1
[View Original Post]
Anyway rumor has it she will have to go back PKL to finish her "contract".
Sounds like you got fed some bad info and fake rumors. She is not going back to PKL. Why do you not just text her booker and confirm before bad rumors like these spread. She might not like being there or just wants to leave. Who really knows. They will give you a million reasons why they like to jump. Some just like to move around. Sulli and Cherry are up in NorCal because they are saying it is slow here. Nicole and Cutie are there with them too.
Someone new and young is coming to PKL group per booker Angela. Would not give me details. It is not Pink.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 413
Looking for younger providers
Originally Posted by
Anchh
[View Original Post]
I finally managed to get verified with one of the bookers (
bookergray.com) and was looking for provider recommendations. I am leaning towards Lisa, what do you guys think of her. I did search her and found a few reviews, she seems promising. I am into lots of DFK which she seems to be comfortable with, and like girls who are passionate and not just going through the motions. But I am not sure if this is the same Lisa everyone is talking about. Also I am concerned about some folks mentioning her age being mid 30's. I was hoping to see a younger provider, I like petite and shapely girls, breasts on the smaller side. Any other provider on that site that anyone can recommend or should I just stick with Lisa?
Good luck in the Kgirl world of LA in finding a provider who's under the age of 30. If you hope the ages listed in the profiles of these gals are true, I suggest you wear dark sunglasses, ask the gal to turn down the lights even more, and then just fantasize.
-
Regular Member
Posts: 21
CGLA and 2 pop and booking
I'm screened with the CGLA PO, but not the 2 pop one. I've seen some posts in the forum about how these orgs rep the same girls, and how it's possible to cross-book. Do you guys think its possible to book Sweet Honey (only see her on the 2 pop site), with the CGLA PO?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 284
Basically SOL
Originally Posted by
Anchh
[View Original Post]
Hello everyone, I am a new member and was looking for a little bit of assistance. While I am not new to the hobby but I've never gone through a Korean Agency. I've seen 2 independent asian providers but have been wanting to use an agency but have had no luck so far. Have sent emails, txts but never get a response, maybe that is cause I always explain my situation when I contact. Are any agencies you guys could recommend that are newbie friendly for verification, I don't have any references from other agencies, but am willing to go through extra hoops to get verified. I am a paid member on PD, HX and TER but my problem is I never really leave reviews (on PD and TER, I've actually never used HX). I only have 2 reviews on PD and nothing else. I have providers I've used regularly that will provide references but they're all PD providers, not p411 or HX.
I was hoping to get some recommendations to help me out here, I figure becoming a regular with at least one agency will help me get verified with the others too.
Yeah man if you provided everything they asked from you and they don't respond then there's nothing else you can do unfortunately. Topic has been covered a million times.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 284
Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
You are right except for the fact that in this case it was done purely for more money and not lower volume to make less. Then if you have a customer who wants CFS and only for a half hour all you get is 240 as compared to the 300 for a full menu and a full hour. Businesses don't survive long like that.
Why do you care so much about their finances? It's almost as if you have a vested interest. If you read his full post you would notice that he was speaking from a consumer's benefits perspective, not from the money making perspective of the girl.
-
Banned Member
Posts: 1258
Originally Posted by
IAmGib1
[View Original Post]
As far as I know Cami is CFS only for 350 is that MSOG or just 1 pop?
Pink is CFS for 280+ 40 MSOG. With the option to do BBFS for 100 more.
There fore in order to compare them side by side Cami is 350 and Pink is 280 CFS or MSOG for 320.
Anyway rumor has it she will have to go back PKL to finish her "contract".
-
Senior Member
Posts: 683
Daisy
Yea, Daisy told me she won't be back until maybe spring or summer. I'll ask if I see her again before end of today.
-
Banned Member
Posts: 1258
Originally Posted by
Toungsten
[View Original Post]
Your point would be well taken but if not for the fact that we mongers here are at the low end of the sex worker industry. Sure some would pay 500 or 1,000 but they wouldn't be here browsing the available girls. As for Cami she went from 300 to 350 and not to 400-420 and none of us know how it affected her volume even if her booker says she is booked for the day. Booked for the day only means she's booked for the number of hours she chooses to work. She has been around for a while and may have wanted to cut back on her working hours. None of us know. In the case of Pink it was for money and money only.
As far as I know Cami is CFS only for 350 is that MSOG or just 1 pop?
Pink is CFS for 280+ 40 MSOG. With the option to do BBFS for 100 more.
There fore in order to compare them side by side Cami is 350 and Pink is 280 CFS or MSOG for 320.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 45
Dabom from Newasianvibe, she is also in a couple other K-orgs.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
BobLove
[View Original Post]
My speculation is that she's trying to avoid a stalker / creep. Otherwise she wouldn't use fake pics.
Asked and answered above.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
PSEunsubbed
[View Original Post]
Great minds think alike, this is a no brainer decision to see the girls who charge more as they will inevitably have fewer customers. Just look at how many reviews PKL girls rack up within like 3 months almost 100 reviews each? That is crazy volume, no thanks. Give me the girl who charges more but probably sees 5 customers or less per day, any day. We can debate all we want about who we think is "busy" but at the end of the day, the girls with the upcharge will always be lower volume, which is a perk / feature.
You are right except for the fact that in this case it was done purely for more money and not lower volume to make less. Then if you have a customer who wants CFS and only for a half hour all you get is 240 as compared to the 300 for a full menu and a full hour. Businesses don't survive long like that.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 3480
Originally Posted by
PSEunsubbed
[View Original Post]
It's either stalker / creep or even retaliation for leaving the previous agency as we can see by these recent posts coming out of nowhere and bashing her for switching and calling her greedy. It is also common practice to not use the old name or old pictures when switching agencies sort of like an unspoken rule that's been in place. Only the popular superstars are able to keep their original names and pictures.
None of the above. You are correct when you say old pics are not usually used and names are usually changed. There was no stalker. She was willing to remain where she was if they would let her up charge and they wouldn't do it to their clientele so there was no retaliation. Your statement that only popular superstars could keep their names and pics indicates that she was neither. As far as bashing did you hear anyone bashing her for charging more. What I said as well as others is that it was a bad business move and being a businessman I can assure that it was. That's not bashing. That's an assessment of a poor move. There have been many increased in price but this one was based on poor judgement. 33% at one pop? No pun intended. Are you kidding?