Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 10,861 to 10,875 of 41752
-
09-02-22 15:36 #30892
Posts: 230Msog
Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr [View Original Post]
-
09-02-22 14:50 #30891
Posts: 529Erica
I met her today. My assessment:
Pros: Top of food chain for face, nice attitude, very clean; love the tits, slightly smaller than Remi, but acceptable size; spinner body, great skin and of course bbfscip.
Cons: Not magnum approved; bad kisser; a bit too GFE, I could only take pussy destruction to level 4-5. Thought I would break her.
Repeat? Maybe, chemistry wasn't amazing, but I like a little PSE in my hookers.
-
09-02-22 13:30 #30890
Posts: 436Erica Hype
One guy here fell in love with her because she has a pretty face and his review was a tale of him making an important emotional connection and then he pleaded with the community to be gentle and generous with Erica because she is special and he wants her to stay in LA. Between the lines of this review the story was accurate pics, meh to timid service, and a pretty face.
That's it, the whole story. If he had just made an accurate informative review none of the hype would have happened.
The moral of the story is leave out the BS in a review and don't tell other mongers what to do or not do.
NEWSFLASH
Women can push babies out of their vagina and let babies use their nipples as a chew toy. If a pro says her nipples or pussy are too sensitive, she doesn't want guys, or just you, doing it. The reasons could be many, but don't be fooled by the tactic to limit their service.
-
09-02-22 13:18 #30889
Posts: 143[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted to remove complaints about the unsafe sex practices of another forum member. Per the Forum's Posting Guidelines, Unsafe Sex Complaints may only be posted in the Unsafe Sex thread. Members may also use the Forum's PM system to voice their complaints about the unsafe sex practices of another Forum Member.
Please do not post complaints about the unsafe sex practices of another forum members. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. Thanks!
-
09-02-22 12:43 #30888
Posts: 55Originally Posted by GoofyPanda [View Original Post]
-
09-02-22 11:32 #30887
Posts: 1163Friday rollcall.
Sfk: Arisa Viki Erika.
Kbliss: Jessica Arisa Erika.
-
09-02-22 11:19 #30886
Posts: 59Originally Posted by KalvinHobbs [View Original Post]
Thank you guys.
-
09-02-22 09:31 #30885
Posts: 163Originally Posted by Irresponsible [View Original Post]
-
09-02-22 06:12 #30884
Posts: 1Bananachacha
Anyone know if bananachacha is legit? Just saw it a few minutes ago and has the same # as a previous site I used to go to.
-
09-02-22 05:44 #30883
Posts: 1834Erica
Originally Posted by Eddy68 [View Original Post]
The "hype" mainly converged around the fact that her photos were quite accurate, that she possessed a good physique, and she could give even the prettiest active kgirls a run for their money. On the other hand, Erica's service was middling, her clitoral sensitivity presented a minor roadblock to some, and she was not very accommodating to those who were well endowed. Given all of this, although not perfect, you can form a decent baseline of what to expect. I can only infer that you were disappointed "just walking in" meant her looks failed to meet your expectation. While beauty is in the eye of the beholder, to an extent, the consensus here confirmed and reinforced that the vast majority found her quite attractive. Moreover, several mongers, myself included, gave praise for how well her photos captured what she looks like in person even if they are slightly glamorized (which is to be expected). So I am at a loss if physical features were the culprit. And her service would easily disqualify her from receiving a superstar accolade by any monger's standard.
Without you expounding further on what you specifically found lacking with Erica or presenting an experience counter to what others have posted, it'll remain only as a nebulous assertion of disappointment, unpersuasive and in need of supportive context.
-
09-02-22 04:54 #30882
Posts: 72Originally Posted by FillHerPussyUp [View Original Post]
-
09-02-22 03:05 #30881
Posts: 1834Bitna revisited
Just saw Bitna recently to see if anything changed for the better or worse.
It appears she's a bit overworked but other than that nothing much has changed from my last visit. All points I raised in my review still holds. I'll just prioritize her less in my rotation as she hasn't seen much improvement.
-
09-02-22 03:05 #30880
Posts: 500They're great
Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr [View Original Post]
Sweet girl but not likely to repeat. A girl can be DDG but if service isn't there, I'm not coming back.
-
09-01-22 21:51 #30879
Posts: 685Originally Posted by Irresponsible [View Original Post]
She's tall and at the time I saw her wasn't particularly toned. Had a pouch. Kinda meh service. She's YMMV so if she likes you and if you can make her horny she can be fun. She was getting bad service grades on the three letter site.
Upside is there tho she has fun personality but only if she likes you. Also one of rare Kgirls who can go absolutely ham on her clit while you're pounding. But again, YMMV. Pussy not too tight. Attractive face but that's that.
Kind of a mixed bag really. She's a cautious recommend for attitude if you know what buttons to press and how to make session fun for her. For pure service, not recommended. If you're looking for a toned body or a spinner, not recommended either.
I know guys who really click with her. I had fun too and she was buying what I was selling. I do like her and her fun fuck potential is high but floor of session is also low. I definitely wouldn't pay LA rates for her tho.
-
09-01-22 21:28 #30878
Posts: 82Titties
For me, I think Yami CGLA has better tits than Remi. I also like Yami's light skin complexion over Remi's tan.
Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr [View Original Post]