Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 586 to 600 of 41525
-
03-29-24 12:07 #40940
Posts: 303Originally Posted by RockItAllNite [View Original Post]
Last October, my favorite agency SDAG was punished and banned by TER for threatening mongers with blacklisting if they did not post good reviews. This meant TER deleted 10 years of reviews of any girl who worked for SDAG, instantly. No new reviews could be written. The next day after this happened, SDAG dropped their policy and changed their website to reflect that.
The user who started the campaign against SDAG was RocketManP. He started this and other threads on TER which led to the ban and wipe:
https://www.theeroticreview.com/disc...e-35468?page=4
Either the admin read the thread or someone messaged them. The admin of TER is very hands-on and does whatever they want. As an example piece of evidence, RocketManP made a permanent internet archive of SDAG's website saying "don't give 7 or below reviews" https://archive.ph/VfFlw. So no one can ever deny it. SDAG went further than this, harassing mongers by text and on message board.
But there was plenty of other users chiming in saying they had been threatened with blacklisting. Particularly with the booker trying to connect their TER username to their real identity.
You can see discussion on this for several weeks, including the 'Asian Providers' board of San Diego around 9-30-2023 (around page 45 now). This was a later reply by RocketManP explaining his position to me:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...511&viewfull=1#post6658511.
The result is I could no longer review girls before seeing them, because all reviews were gone. And I was at that time trying to get active on TER, in particular writing a review for my all time favorite to help her out. I tried 5 times and couldn't, TER banned new reviews for SDAG both by keyword and by manual approval checks. I explained I didn't care about SDAG I just want to help this girl out with an honest review, and the admin of TER personally explained to me SDAG was banned for future reviews (which I did not know yet). Three months later SDAG's booker texted me saying they were allowed to have reviews again. lol
RocketManP was honest, his actions didn't hurt anyone, and in fact helped people because SDAG immediately stopped harassing mongers by text and on forum. That is the honest way, if there is one user persistent enough.
There is also a different, dirtier way. It is a kind of jury nullification on TER that nobody can prove or detect. Leave 4-6 reviews for the girls that ssessang books. Just 1 review kills business for a while, I've had both bookers and girls say so. Don't leave any hint or mention that you did this, just leave the review. And don't identify who you are in any way (let 1-4 days pass before doing this). Don't review too many girls ssessang books, just pick on every 2 weeks. I don't agree with this way, it is better to go RocketManP's route. He proved me wrong and he is a hero to mongers.
-
03-29-24 11:54 #40939
Posts: 1153Kbliss Friday fun. Ina on vaca, back next week.
Remi Tami Viki.
-
03-29-24 10:52 #40938
Posts: 111Sunny will be missed dearly
Originally Posted by Christophe1 [View Original Post]
-
03-29-24 08:20 #40937
Posts: 319Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]
- Angela / Sesanggirls both numbers go to the same agency and they are always unfriendly and arrogant in her communications. They will try to bully you.
- They have the attitude that you will kowtow to what they give you and how they serve it. Take it or leave it.
- They will try to charge you for canceling an appointment even if it is an act of god. However, if they cancel on you, too bad.
Appointments are booked back to back every time, so the girl doesn't have time to prepare properly for the next customer.
- They never let you in the door early, but they always encourage their girls to rush you out.
- You can only book 1 day before the day of an appointment. No pre-booking before that.
- They have plenty of shills or / and shill identities on the online forums. It is not hard to figure out who they are.
- There are many other bookers and girls. F* this agency and F* Angela too. This is why I do not give them any of my time or $$$ anymore. Business is about facilitating a mutually beneficial relationship built on respect which is reciprocated.
- My time is valuable, otherwise I would not "pay to play" or even be able to do so. Those that do not have other options, may put up with this bullshit, but those that do, will not.
I tell it like it is.
-
03-29-24 05:54 #40936
Posts: 10Cream girl
Haven't seen a provider for quite a while, quite decent. Photos are of some likeness. Tits are nice.
Service was good. GFE was good. I think 20's. , not DDG but very good.
-
03-29-24 01:58 #40935
Posts: 16Fine in theory.
Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]
-
03-29-24 01:56 #40934
Posts: 303Originally Posted by Vulcan1009 [View Original Post]
The other thing is if I book same day, it's about a 1 in 3 chance I can't get the time I want even if it is 10 am (I prefer 9 am but will settle for 10 am). If I can't do that, I don't go. So for me it's a deal breaker anyways, without going into the details of my schedule. They have already lost my business if they can't offer pre-booking, so they try their best to do. I appreciate it. It's win-win. It is a good point that I might get sick, but I don't have a choice.
That said, they have no more right to cancel than I do. I won't fight this, but someone else eventually will. The last time an agency had a dumb rule - and it was pretty dumb - just one monger ended it. It was well documented on two forums and I had to see this first-hand because I used that agency during that time. It sucked a lot. But it worked.
And just to be clear, this is bad business. If the girl gets sick she is out thousands and mongers get sick. The owner is out hundreds, I won't say further. Only the booker comes out ahead, by that little bit of money. The girl then gets replaced but that doesn't hurt the booker in any way. They book multiple girls after all. In fact the 3 times they cancelled they immediately offered an alternative girl.
I draw the line at going both ways and making dishonest threats to involve other bookers. This is pure greed and also as others mongers testify, a lie based on fear and threats (they were able to book with other bookers no problem). As I pointed out, the motivation points to it being a lie, a lie that helps nobody else. And that is really their biggest mistake. To threaten people with a lie, for a rule they can't even follow themselves.
Name and shame Sessang if this continues.
-
03-29-24 01:08 #40933
Posts: 973Always book on a good day, don't pre-book
Originally Posted by AsianAssEater [View Original Post]
I always book when I'm already home and make sure all things are good to go, felt great and horney, money in hand, car in good condition etc.
There are times I prebook and it felt weird, like what happen if anything comes up that I hade to cancel?
That's why I don't prebook anymore.
-
03-28-24 23:46 #40932
Posts: 305Davika hx
Looks like Davika from spicedolls on hx is going the Celeste route and is working with kgirl orgs now. Saw her last year and she wasn't anywhere near kgirl standards. Dropping the warning on here before anybody gets burned.
-
03-28-24 23:10 #40931
Posts: 423Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]
-
03-28-24 20:09 #40930
Posts: 303Originally Posted by Trimogasi [View Original Post]
You can search Mari here and she has about 8 reviews on USAG and 7 reviews on TER. She allows video but no face. I highly recommend Mari if it is the same girl. Other jgirls should follow her example.
-
03-28-24 19:29 #40929
Posts: 85Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]
-
03-28-24 18:29 #40928
Posts: 8Namiko CGLA
Has anyone taken the plunge with her yet?
Her photos look amazing but want to know the deets from anyone who's tasted for themselves.
Also is she MSOG? Not too much a fan of one and done sessions.
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/namiko%2Fmari(j).
-
03-28-24 18:29 #40927
Posts: 8Namiko CGLA
Has anyone taken the plunge with her yet?
Her photos look amazing but want to know the deets from anyone who's tasted for themselves.
Also is she MSOG? Not too much a fan of one and done sessions.
-
03-28-24 17:37 #40926
Posts: 303Originally Posted by SolarisMan [View Original Post]
This policy is puzzling from a business standpoint until you analyze further. Later I will show it is probably not a real policy but booker BS. I get that they don't want some guy changing his mind or flaking, that's wrong, but people are going to get sick. And they are not going to get someone to pay up if they are a flake so this could only hurt their real customers. If you submit proof, all the better, but nothing works without some level of trust. It is the most basic thing that it is in nobody's interest to get sick. It costs providers (but not bookers!) so much more money for that to happen. It's also a matter of basic decency that even the most sexually depraved monger would usually respect. So they should too.
In 20 years I have only had to cancel on my dentist twice over being sick, and they waived the fine they normally charge without any question (which I have paid once when I simply overslept). I am not some stranger, I've used both my dentist and agency for over a decade. They should be no different. I would assume my agency would not fine me when I point out I've done business with them 50 times over 10 years, have had them cancel MY booking 3 times.
I'm puzzled by the threat to blacklist with other bookers. That's really odd and personally I don't believe it. It sounds more like the booker wants your little bit of money rather than being embarrassed to cancel. It costs them money to cancel, and they don't really lose money if the girl gets sick since they can just book you for another girl they didn't get sick! You see what I'm saying now. The girl and actual agency wouldn't want you to see them while sick, they'd lose thousands of dollars. If even just half of cancels told the truth it's still worth it. But the booker doesn't really lose money if you get her sick. I hope you get what I'm saying.
So name and shame the booker. Sesangirls. If I keep hearing this name come up, I will make the nuclear suggestion that is both safe and honest and worked in the past. Let's not go there unless absolutely necessary.
Edit: Someone PM'd me suggesting Sesanggirls was only blocking the user rather than a broader blacklist. I am just going by the original poster and to quote "all 4 other agencies they work with would be notified if I didn't pay". That crosses the line for me, since the monger did nothing wrong. Nothing! If a booker wanted to blacklist me just for cancelling, I'd actually be fine with that even if I didn't agree. I'm a happy person, I don't hurt others even if they hurt me. But threatening to tell other bookers on me for doing the right thing..that's ridiculously vindictive. I am a very forgiving person and would restrain myself from doing anything. But I don't like bullies, especially one that is selfishly putting the girls in danger like this booker. I would also point out I saw a different monger..solve the problem. Again, there is a safe and honest solution to all of this if this continues to be a problem.
If other people keep running into this, let us know.