Korean Agency BB

[Bastard Chorum]

I just get the usual "broken water pipes" or she's want to end work early, or she has stuff to do, when I run into cancellations. I'm just surprised to see that M, or any booker for that matter, will elaborate to that extent. It would be nice to be told that she's too tired to service me right. I guess I'm just too vanilla and not that special LOL.

[Toungsten]

Boner is spot on for M. She provides girls whose service and performance are consistent. There are, of course, outliers on both ends of the spectrum but she's got a better track record than most other bookers from my point of view. Unless you've been living under a rock and not paying attention to reviews / discussions of M's crew, you can get a pretty good idea of what to expect with any her girls: probably MILF look, ok body / looks, above average service, and BB is likely. All aspects are YMMV but as mentioned, M's pretty consistent. It's disingenuous when you compare and critique against legends like Rain, Suri, Queen, etc and take that as the norm. Celebrate and enjoy the legends but parity of service and / or looks should be compared with contemporaneous girls to provide all mongers an objective and pragmatic prospective of current girls. So how does the service of M's girls rank against the girls of other agencies? My take is that, except for a few individual gems in LA and OC that are better, as a collective group, M is better than most.

It's been my experience that I've gotten better overall sessions when there's a language barrier. Effective communication tends to be a wash as it'll either lead to a better time or she opens more and talks too much to the point it starts affecting her service. This is just in general terms for girls from all bookers I've seen. Although, I will note, that having elementary Korean skills will be for the most part beneficial. They tend to find it cute and the bumbling broken sentences earn laughs and short playful teaching opportunities for the girls that enhances the mood and service.

My limited Korean is the word bimil which I use when I know they don't want something repeated and yes they find it cute and it does enhance the mood and service.

[Bastard Chorum]

Speaking from experiences, M girls are one level above other agencies in term of performance. They work the hardest. No upcharge for MSOG and BBFS. Even refused to see me because they thought they would be too tired to give good service. Now that's service and commitment. I have many ATFs and star performers outside of M but I will always appreciate M.

Others may think I am advocating M girls but with a name like Boner, I already warned you guys to use your big head when reading my posts.

You are also talking about my ATF Rain. I didn't need English to feel connected with her but then again I prefer girls who don't talk a lot LOL.

Boner is spot on for M. She provides girls whose service and performance are consistent. There are, of course, outliers on both ends of the spectrum but she's got a better track record than most other bookers from my point of view. Unless you've been living under a rock and not paying attention to reviews / discussions of M's crew, you can get a pretty good idea of what to expect with any her girls: probably MILF look, ok body / looks, above average service, and BB is likely. All aspects are YMMV but as mentioned, M's pretty consistent. It's disingenuous when you compare and critique against legends like Rain, Suri, Queen, etc and take that as the norm. Celebrate and enjoy the legends but parity of service and / or looks should be compared with contemporaneous girls to provide all mongers an objective and pragmatic prospective of current girls. So how does the service of M's girls rank against the girls of other agencies? My take is that, except for a few individual gems in LA and OC that are better, as a collective group, M is better than most.

It's been my experience that I've gotten better overall sessions when there's a language barrier. Effective communication tends to be a wash as it'll either lead to a better time or she opens more and talks too much to the point it starts affecting her service. This is just in general terms for girls from all bookers I've seen. Although, I will note, that having elementary Korean skills will be for the most part beneficial. They tend to find it cute and the bumbling broken sentences earn laughs and short playful teaching opportunities for the girls that enhances the mood and service.

[Toungsten]

Saw her at the PV location, parking is bad during the morning! Anyways. Sasha is very cute looking, has a tattoo along her belly probably covering a scar or something. She has a nice body and with me she allowed BBFS and really got into it. She gets pretty vocal. She requested I nut outside, I obliged. She got me to cum twice. She does use a bit of teeth in her bbj and likes to bite, not hard, in a playful way. Overall Looks are good, service is excellent. Sucks she's leaving so soon.

That picture you referred to in your review is actually her friend that she's going to San Jose to see and will probably return with her in a few weeks if all goes well.

[Toungsten]

I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.

This is why we must do our due diligence on writing and reading reviews. I rarely see a girl before there are more than a few reviews and also before I can see who the reviewer is and what his track record is. I don't dispute what you experienced with Cona, Lucia or Nikki. I haven't seen Nikki so I have no basis for comparison and there are very few reviews of her but they seem to be quite positive. As far as Cona and Lucia I'm surprised to hear you say that Cona has lost a step since her reviews seem to be as good as ever. As for Lucia being hit or miss all I can say that it's always a hit for me and apparently for most others based on her reviews. Looks are certainly YMMV but the reviews of Lucia's performance is usually off the charts. That being said just shows how important it is for reviews here where most of us are looking for the same thing. Whether it's good or bad it gives us a basis for comparison.

[Toungsten]

Speaking of Rain, whatever happened to her? Is she in No Cal? Back to Korea? NYC?

As far as we know Korea.

[Toungsten]

M.
Lacey.......................................................... PV.
Cona, Lucia, Nikki, Hannah, Serena, Honey......................... WLA.

Sunny,
Glow, Lyn. .....................................WLA.

Newtopasian.
Eden, Ruby, Min, June..................... WLA.

[WoohooSoCal]

Speaking of Rain, whatever happened to her? Is she in No Cal? Back to Korea? NYC?

[Toungsten]

Come on T.

Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.

This isn't kstyleblog. .

What makes you think that I'm referring to anything besides BBFS? I want to see more reviews to let us know and that goes both ways. BBFS and not BBFS. Sometimes you can even tell by a non BBFS review if there is a possibility to get it. This is in keeping with the spirit of a BB thread.

[Toungsten]

Speaking from experiences, M girls are one level above other agencies in term of performance. They work the hardest. No upcharge for MSOG and BBFS. Even refused to see me because they thought they would be too tired to give good service. Now that's service and commitment. I have many ATFs and star performers outside of M but I will always appreciate M.

Others may think I am advocating M girls but with a name like Boner, I already warned you guys to use your big head when reading my posts.

You are also talking about my ATF Rain. I didn't need English to feel connected with her but then again I prefer girls who don't talk a lot LOL.

That's why I ended my post by saying YMMV when it came to Rain. Great fuck but just not my favorite. Lia, who was not the best looking and didn't have a great body, was probably one of the best fucks of a my life. Performance there was none better IMHO. I actually had the same experience with some of M's girls as to not wanting to see me because I made them work too hard. It kind of indicates how much I value performance.

[BonerAppetitty]

I don't even like to review but didn't see enough guys sharing that I joined just to answer questions. You don't see me contributing much only because I prefer looks over BB at the moment. I have always mentioned girls I liked and tried to describe their looks. There were star performers like Miracle but I need to see more reviews from legit mongers to consider a girl as star performer. You guys should know which reviewers are reliable if you don't want to be disappointed.

Sometimes I am pretty discouraged when thinking guys hide the good girls. Without reviewers like BC or T, I might have lost interests a while back. Only thing that keeps me going is I knew how bad things can get if nobody share anything.

Come on T.

Being this is a bareback thread the guys only care about if they can jizz inside her with "no condom"! Not looks! LOL.

This isn't kstyleblog. .

[BonerAppetitty]

Speaking from experiences, M girls are one level above other agencies in term of performance. They work the hardest. No upcharge for MSOG and BBFS. Even refused to see me because they thought they would be too tired to give good service. Now that's service and commitment. I have many ATFs and star performers outside of M but I will always appreciate M.

Others may think I am advocating M girls but with a name like Boner, I already warned you guys to use your big head when reading my posts.

You are also talking about my ATF Rain. I didn't need English to feel connected with her but then again I prefer girls who don't talk a lot LOL.

Do you really find Cona, Lucia, Sasha and now Nikki, who I haven't seen but who has some pretty good reviews, to be very bad? We're here for the sex and those girls give some of the best sex that you will get including BBFS which you won't get from most of those who you consider to be "HOT". They offer great sex and are somewhere between cute, exotic and pretty with personalities that make for a good connection. What more are we looking for? I saw Rain when she came here with Cona, Grace and Kiss a few years ago and she was my least favorite in that group. Yes she was a sex machine but with absolutely no English skills that was all it was. Banging away for an hour with no real sensuality or connection. I've said it before and I'll say it again it's always YMMV. Don't know what you're not getting from the current crop but it has been pretty damn good for me.

[Jbjb1983]

Is still BBFS still or not? Recent reports suggests no, but makes up for it in a fantastic CFS session?

Saw her at the PV location, parking is bad during the morning! Anyways. Sasha is very cute looking, has a tattoo along her belly probably covering a scar or something. She has a nice body and with me she allowed BBFS and really got into it. She gets pretty vocal. She requested I nut outside, I obliged. She got me to cum twice. She does use a bit of teeth in her bbj and likes to bite, not hard, in a playful way. Overall Looks are good, service is excellent. Sucks she's leaving so soon.

[JohnnyEm]

I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.

I totally agree! When We review these girls, we're not trying to slam M and her girls because all of us have had a blast there at some point. Cona has lost a big step! Lucia is hit or miss and IMO isn't very attractive and Nikki, who I just saw last weekend was a complete dud. I don't know why we continue to spend our $$ here.

[Toungsten]

I just posted yesterday about in very recent memory about the new girls being bad. (According to some posters here). I try my best to post good and bad reviews when I do go. There hasn't been too memorable ones for awhile now. I still miss my experience with Rain when I saw her awhile ago. I'm curious as to the criteria M uses to get girls.

Do you really find Cona, Lucia, Sasha and now Nikki, who I haven't seen but who has some pretty good reviews, to be very bad? We're here for the sex and those girls give some of the best sex that you will get including BBFS which you won't get from most of those who you consider to be "HOT". They offer great sex and are somewhere between cute, exotic and pretty with personalities that make for a good connection. What more are we looking for? I saw Rain when she came here with Cona, Grace and Kiss a few years ago and she was my least favorite in that group. Yes she was a sex machine but with absolutely no English skills that was all it was. Banging away for an hour with no real sensuality or connection. I've said it before and I'll say it again it's always YMMV. Don't know what you're not getting from the current crop but it has been pretty damn good for me.