Organized German FKK Club Tours since 1995
Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
Sex Vacation
Best Escorts
click for FREE hookups
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #7394
    Quote Originally Posted by DHorn420  [View Original Post]
    I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.
    Most girls are milfy and I can't think of anyone who is youngish that worked there except Diane which was fall of last year. I cannot think of anyone this week that I would like to see. I always wondered if it's worth to fly up north since that is the closest place with the best talent.

  2. #7393
    Quote Originally Posted by Kabah  [View Original Post]
    I don't get it. I saw Lucia once. I was expecting a PSE girl. Instead I got a Shy, less than GFE type. I even asked her name before I left to make sure I was seeing another girl other than her.

    Has anyone had that experience with Lucia on a first experience. Because it was Miles away from PSE for me.
    Honestly there was a bit of shyness at first glance at the door but with some heavy DFK and a good pussy eating to begin our time together she loosened up completely and was as sensual and sexual and as responsive and aggressive as anyone would want. Sometimes it's up to us to bring out the beast that lies beneath that shy and unassuming exterior.

  3. #7392
    Quote Originally Posted by LundonFrog  [View Original Post]
    Is Cona thick in the good curvy way? I don't mind a bit of baby fat.

    At the end of the day I guess it comes down to service. She seems like the type to take it slow but I'm Hoping I can get multiple shots with minimal downtime in between.
    Yeah its thick in a good curvy way.

    She loves getting eaten out. I made her cum like 3 times but beware she allows bbfscip so you might want to avoid giving her daty. She has droopy tits but her body to me is very sexy. I don't really like spinners.

  4. #7391

    Cona Body Type

    Quote Originally Posted by Slideryyz  [View Original Post]
    Cona is a sweetheart but her body isn't the tightest.
    Is Cona thick in the good curvy way? I don't mind a bit of baby fat.

    At the end of the day I guess it comes down to service. She seems like the type to take it slow but I'm Hoping I can get multiple shots with minimal downtime in between.

  5. #7390
    Quote Originally Posted by LundonFrog  [View Original Post]
    Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.
    Cona is a sweetheart but her body isn't the tightest.

  6. #7389
    Quote Originally Posted by Seafor  [View Original Post]
    You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.
    She is very moody and wonder what her standards to let guys in now and then.

  7. #7388
    Quote Originally Posted by Toungsten  [View Original Post]
    Pretty good assessment. Cona is probably the prettiest but you have to like a little chunkiness. Sasha apparently is YMMV with more GFE and truthfully I didn't feel teeth and I"m not too small. Lucia has that sexual aggression and goes at it at a more PSE pace than the others. Each has her own qualities that make it hard for me to make a choice.
    I don't get it. I saw Lucia once. I was expecting a PSE girl. Instead I got a Shy, less than GFE type. I even asked her name before I left to make sure I was seeing another girl other than her.

    Has anyone had that experience with Lucia on a first experience. Because it was Miles away from PSE for me.

  8. #7387
    Quote Originally Posted by Ddddd21  [View Original Post]
    I would choose cona over lucia and sasha.

    Cona is a veteran and she looks really hot. Sasha doesn't allow BBFS and her BBBJ hurts because she uses a lot of her teeth. Lucia is an easy BBFS but her face is just meh. If you want a spinner go for sasha or lucia because cona is a bit on the busty side. Overall for me I would go with cona because to me she looks the hottest and have the best body with top notch service but that's just my opinion.
    Pretty good assessment. Cona is probably the prettiest but you have to like a little chunkiness. Sasha apparently is YMMV with more GFE and truthfully I didn't feel teeth and I"m not too small. Lucia has that sexual aggression and goes at it at a more PSE pace than the others. Each has her own qualities that make it hard for me to make a choice.

  9. #7386
    Quote Originally Posted by Seafor  [View Original Post]
    You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.
    I stopped trying after a few months LOL especially after learning from talking privately with couple of mongers that have access to her, their selling point is BBFS, that's it. Girls are okay looking or meh, barely anything worth looking at, so mainly it's the BBFS that keeps her agency busy, not the fact that the girls are not hot LOL I have had luck getting BBFS at other agencies where the girls are hot and young.

  10. #7385

    Serena is boxy and pudgy looking

    40 years old. Boxy looking. 160 lbs. Serena. Pudgy box shape like the old BMW cars.

  11. #7384
    Quote Originally Posted by LundonFrog  [View Original Post]
    Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.
    I would choose cona over lucia and sasha.

    Cona is a veteran and she looks really hot. Sasha doesn't allow BBFS and her BBBJ hurts because she uses a lot of her teeth. Lucia is an easy BBFS but her face is just meh. If you want a spinner go for sasha or lucia because cona is a bit on the busty side. Overall for me I would go with cona because to me she looks the hottest and have the best body with top notch service but that's just my opinion.

  12. #7383
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter321  [View Original Post]
    Will do thanks.
    You can call / text / offer a thousand bucks, you will never get into M's agency. I'm reasonably sure after 4 years of trying, that it doesn't even exist. Unicorn agency.

  13. #7382
    Senior Member


    Posts: 316

    Amber

    Quote Originally Posted by IAmGib1  [View Original Post]
    Exactly. Bet it wasn't your first time seeing her either right Hapa?
    Saw Amber 9 years ago in LA. I guess we're due for a reunion.

  14. #7381
    Quote Originally Posted by LundonFrog  [View Original Post]
    Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.
    Having been with all three I can't even make that choice. Close your eyes and put a pin on a name and go for it. It's a great choice to have to make.

  15. #7380

    Lucia vs Cona vs Sasha

    Quote Originally Posted by Toungsten  [View Original Post]
    Don't miss Lucia.
    Between the three of them all having glowing reviews, I'm having such a hard time deciding.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
Ava Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape