Seeking Arrangements

**ARegularGuy** · 12-19-18 17:38

I met with Brandy twice. The first time was decent the second time rather ho-hum. Okay looking but not hot in my book. Never had any issues but she did continue to message me about seeing her again. Long sob story about blah blah blah. I wasn't interested.

ARG.

**NewEngland** · 12-19-18 16:58

Originally Posted by SteveInMa428 [View Original Post]

So NOT worth the visit. She will lie and ask for money, then will threaten to get her guy friends after you when you want the money back. She is hot, but so NOT worth the visit.

I agree you got to be firm and tell her the ground rules.

**Fun0410** · 12-19-18 15:56

Originally Posted by SteveInMa428 [View Original Post]

So NOT worth the visit. She will lie and ask for money, then will threaten to get her guy friends after you when you want the money back. She is hot, but so NOT worth the visit.

Anybody have information to break the tie?

**SteveInMa428** · 12-19-18 07:37

Originally Posted by NewEngland [View Original Post]

https://www.seeking.com/member/9e87e...1-c5cc95ca1bd1

So NOT worth the visit. She will lie and ask for money, then will threaten to get her guy friends after you when you want the money back. She is hot, but so NOT worth the visit.

**NewEngland** · 12-18-18 20:34

https://www.seeking.com/member/9e87e...1-c5cc95ca1bd1

**Aardvarks** · 12-18-18 19:10

Originally Posted by Aardvarks [View Original Post]

Here's the note from the guy in NC. It works but is a little complicated. I had best results in Chrome.

I'm a programmer, and I spend a good portion of my time doing web development. I've noted that SA has been rewriting portions of their site from a traditional "click link, wait for server return the new page" style to a "single-page application" approach. Turns out that due to some rather silly programming choices on their part, it's actually possible to view the text content of messages even if you don't have premium time enabled.

It involves opening up your browser's "development tools" window so you can inspect the contents of the page and the data being requested, and should work in either Chrome or Firefox.

Log in to SA and go to your inbox. Right-click anywhere on the page and choose "Inspect Element". The browser's dev tools should either pop up as a separate window, or as part of the main window. Click on the "network" tab in the dev tools. Then, back in the SA inbox screen, click on a conversation.

If you go back to the "network" tab, you should see a list of all the data requests the SA page asked for from the server. One of them should look like "/ inbox? Page=1&limit=25". Click on that one. It'll show a bunch of technical details of some of the message headers.

Now, look for a tab called "Response". If you click on that, you should see a tree with sections like "status", "message", "conversation", and "metadata". Expand "conversation" "messages" "data". You should see some numbered entries, 0 and up. Those represent each of the messages in the conversation, from both of you. (Side note: the "metadata" object has a whole bunch of info that they know about your own account. Some of it is info you entered yourself, like profile info. There's also things like "payments_total", which appears to be how much you've actually ever paid SA, unread message count, whether you're in the EU, and even fields labeled "has_under_age_punishment" and "has_unacknowledged_punishment". Very interesting.).

Each message entry has a field called "body", which is the text that's shown in your inbox. If you've got premium active, it's the actual message text. If not, it's "Upgrade to read".

Here's where they did something silly. They send back the text that should be shown, but *they also send back the original text too*. So, even if the "body" field says "Upgrade to read", the "original_body" field shows the actual no-kidding message that was sent. You can inspect each of the messages that was received, and effectively read the conversation.

Once you've done all of the above paste the text into this viewer. Makes it easy to browse via a tree.

http://jsonviewer.stack.hu/

**Drewonhere** · 12-18-18 16:45

Originally Posted by Stylish [View Original Post]

Interesting. I'm pasting a link below that (hopefully) provides a quicker way to get to the post with the back door instructions.

It's worth pointing out that you can't respond to the messages, you can only read them. And it's not very user friendly. But if you left a bunch of feelers just before your paid membership expired, then you can at least go check the responses without having to upgrade again. SA will probably find out about this soon enough and close the back door though.

I posted the thread breadcrumbs last weekend.

**JohnTies** · 12-18-18 13:39

Originally Posted by Aardvarks [View Original Post]

For giggles try searching for "sexual" in profile text. I've blocked over 300 profiles.

"I am looking for someone to help open my mind to new ideas for my art and new experiences. I am not in favor of anything sexual but I am here to make new friends and form a cordial relationship. ".

"Monthly allowance, someone seeking a platonic relationship. ".

"Not really looking for anything sexual right now; just looking for someone that'll listen when I speak. ".

"I'm looking for more of a non sexual sugar baby-sugar daddy relationship. ".

If this were a real life meet up of two adults on a first date and the girl says "Just so you know we're never having sex this is a non-sexual relationship" how many of us would just stand up and leave?

How many lonely rich guys are there out there who want to pay to spend time listening to this drivel? "Help you open your mind to art and new experiences?" Seriously? Read a book or go to a museum.

Though I will say I do appreciate the honesty it helps me get through their profiles quickly and not waste any time on them.

They may or may not mean the platonic, non sexual, etc for relationships. They could be posting that up in case someone they know sees them on the site, they would be covered.

Just my. 02 cents, I have not contacted any of the girls that post those things but may throw a message out to them and see what happens.

**Aardvarks** · 12-18-18 11:05

Originally Posted by BenignNine [View Original Post]

Can you point us to the hack?

Here's the note from the guy in NC. It works but is a little complicated. I had best results in Chrome.

I'm a programmer, and I spend a good portion of my time doing web development. I've noted that SA has been rewriting portions of their site from a traditional "click link, wait for server return the new page" style to a "single-page application" approach. Turns out that due to some rather silly programming choices on their part, it's actually possible to view the text content of messages even if you don't have premium time enabled.

It involves opening up your browser's "development tools" window so you can inspect the contents of the page and the data being requested, and should work in either Chrome or Firefox.

Log in to SA and go to your inbox. Right-click anywhere on the page and choose "Inspect Element". The browser's dev tools should either pop up as a separate window, or as part of the main window. Click on the "network" tab in the dev tools. Then, back in the SA inbox screen, click on a conversation.

If you go back to the "network" tab, you should see a list of all the data requests the SA page asked for from the server. One of them should look like "/ inbox? Page=1&limit=25". Click on that one. It'll show a bunch of technical details of some of the message headers.

Now, look for a tab called "Response". If you click on that, you should see a tree with sections like "status", "message", "conversation", and "metadata". Expand "conversation" "messages" "data". You should see some numbered entries, 0 and up. Those represent each of the messages in the conversation, from both of you. (Side note: the "metadata" object has a whole bunch of info that they know about your own account. Some of it is info you entered yourself, like profile info. There's also things like "payments_total", which appears to be how much you've actually ever paid SA, unread message count, whether you're in the EU, and even fields labeled "has_under_age_punishment" and "has_unacknowledged_punishment". Very interesting.).

Each message entry has a field called "body", which is the text that's shown in your inbox. If you've got premium active, it's the actual message text. If not, it's "Upgrade to read".

Here's where they did something silly. They send back the text that should be shown, but *they also send back the original text too*. So, even if the "body" field says "Upgrade to read", the "original_body" field shows the actual no-kidding message that was sent. You can inspect each of the messages that was received, and effectively read the conversation.

**RandomFragment** · 12-18-18 10:49

Can you point us to the hack?

Originally Posted by LordOfThEeyes [View Original Post]

So a bit ago someone posted in the Richmond Virginia about the coding and finding the messages. Well the girls do in fact get your messages. And they send their numbers. It worked. I beat the system. Spread the word. Screw them bastards and their 90 $ fee LOL.

**Aardvarks** · 12-18-18 10:29

For giggles try searching for "sexual" in profile text. I've blocked over 300 profiles.

"I am looking for someone to help open my mind to new ideas for my art and new experiences. I am not in favor of anything sexual but I am here to make new friends and form a cordial relationship. ".

"Monthly allowance, someone seeking a platonic relationship. ".

"Not really looking for anything sexual right now; just looking for someone that'll listen when I speak. ".

"I'm looking for more of a non sexual sugar baby-sugar daddy relationship. ".

If this were a real life meet up of two adults on a first date and the girl says "Just so you know we're never having sex this is a non-sexual relationship" how many of us would just stand up and leave?

How many lonely rich guys are there out there who want to pay to spend time listening to this drivel? "Help you open your mind to art and new experiences?" Seriously? Read a book or go to a museum.

Though I will say I do appreciate the honesty it helps me get through their profiles quickly and not waste any time on them.

**LordOfThEeyes** · 12-17-18 22:57

So a bit ago someone posted in the Richmond Virginia about the coding and finding the messages. Well the girls do in fact get your messages. And they send their numbers. It worked. I beat the system. Spread the word. Screw them bastards and their 90 $ fee LOL.

**Cheese4256** · 12-17-18 17:48

Originally Posted by Malibu1980 [View Original Post]

Finally after 6 months of texting, talking and dicking me around I finally met this hot 50 yr old MILF last night. 60 for a blowjob. I'm banned from SA and can't get on to grab her link or screenshot her photo and get are messages but in short. We contacted first in July and been texting since then on and off and every time we make plans to meet she blows me off, excuses, doesn't text back so I eventually told her off in October. But we reconnected again late November because once I start something I want an end game to it so finally ended up doing it last night and well worth it. Doesn't look her age, nice body, blowjob was very good. I'll edit this post which a link once I sign up for SA again with another email for now still banned and off the site with no resolution in sight.

Thanks for the report. Do you recall her username?

**Malibu1980** · 12-17-18 14:36

Finally after 6 months of texting, talking and dicking me around I finally met this hot 50 yr old MILF last night. 60 for a blowjob. I'm banned from SA and can't get on to grab her link or screenshot her photo and get are messages but in short. We contacted first in July and been texting since then on and off and every time we make plans to meet she blows me off, excuses, doesn't text back so I eventually told her off in October. But we reconnected again late November because once I start something I want an end game to it so finally ended up doing it last night and well worth it. Doesn't look her age, nice body, blowjob was very good. I'll edit this post which a link once I sign up for SA again with another email for now still banned and off the site with no resolution in sight.

**Samuel05** · 12-17-18 09:20

She contacted me last Sat night requesting photos. No msg just a request. Usually say no msg no photos. So she asks if I'm busy. She staying in Revere at hotel. Wants me to come over. Get her to move to text. Wants $6. Leaving Sun morning. Partied on Fri so its a no go for me. Today, Mon, there a new post and a different pic. So hot. Be back in Feb.

https://www.seeking.com/member/1d2b8...9-1d022a0151dc