Thread: Seeking Arrangements
+
Add Report
Results 5,851 to 5,865 of 9192
-
08-03-20 22:32 #3342
Posts: 580Another hooker on SA
-
08-03-20 11:24 #3341
Posts: 232Brneyed69
Short meet & greet a year or two ago. She was off the site for a while so I didn't bother with a review. Appears to be active again. Photos must be at least 20 years old. Nothing like that today. BBW without the "Beautiful" part, short(er) hair, unattractive face, miserable personality and difficult. Never got to discussing arrangement. North of Boston somewhere around Peabody if I remember correctly. Not worth the time to pursue, you're sure to be disappointed.
https://www.seeking.com/member/bee54...4-ddb88276eefc
-
08-02-20 17:14 #3340
Posts: 702AstridSunshine
https://www.seeking.com/member/471f4...3-5e704cfaf675
Her profile says NSA, but her last message to me was "I'm not a woman who can be physical with someone I just met. " Next!
-
08-02-20 16:54 #3339
Posts: 580Sophia
Knew I had seen her profile before just couldn't place it. Odd thing is, I Google search the pics and get zero hits, search the number and ads with the same pics pop up everywhere. I would report her but it is a waste of time, SA will leave her profile up and just block me from seeing her.
https://www.adultlook.com/p/3096589
https://www.seeking.com/member/a6198...0-4c157942c923
-
08-02-20 14:30 #3338
Posts: 702Originally Posted by Bran001 [View Original Post]
-
08-02-20 12:03 #3337
Posts: 275So Fake
Originally Posted by Blondie831 [View Original Post]
Watch out bros. Maybe Lacey's boyfriend is trying to burn us.
-
08-02-20 09:08 #3336
Posts: 3748Originally Posted by Bran001 [View Original Post]
By the way--they ALMOST plugged the leak that enabled my hack. They made some significant changes. So I had to slightly modify the hacking method. It took a while to figure out their game! But I did, and the new method now works as well as the old one had. At least for now!
-
08-02-20 09:05 #3335
Posts: 3748The best 24
Originally Posted by OtherPerson [View Original Post]
-
08-02-20 09:01 #3334
Posts: 702Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]
-
08-02-20 08:58 #3333
Posts: 3748Doctor C?
Originally Posted by Sitteb36 [View Original Post]
-
08-01-20 21:15 #3332
Posts: 702Originally Posted by OtherPerson [View Original Post]
-
08-01-20 15:42 #3331
Posts: 53The best 24
Curious if anyone can still see this profile on SA. The best 24 . (in Boston). We had just starting messaging when she put $$ into a message and her profile disappeared. Curious if she got blocked for using that or something else with someone else or she just blocked me. She had a sexy picture up and looked like she was seeking a ppm right away. Maybe someone else can pursue, if she's still active and just blocked me.
-
08-01-20 14:16 #3330
Posts: 3748Originally Posted by Joe1223 [View Original Post]
But the more I ponder it, it still, logically, leads back to my original conclusion, that, when all is said and done, there are really only two kinds of girls on any "sugar" site. Thus, maybe the difference between "semi-pro" and a "pro" on a sugar site is:
Pro: A hoe that knows she's a hoe.
Semi-pro: A hoe that doesn't know she's a hoe.
Since that exhausts all the possibilities, ALL SA girls must, therefore, fall into one or the other of the above two catagories!
QED!
-
07-31-20 22:18 #3329
Posts: 232Originally Posted by PaulRew [View Original Post]
-
07-31-20 19:06 #3328
Posts: 580Sugarbae80
Sweet enough girl but expectations are unrealistic. Can not host, wants $300, CFS.
Translation: Too old, too pudgy, too many rules and too much dough.
Hard pass.
https://www.seeking.com/member/8ffe1...0-b10572487093