Rubrankings.com
click for FREE hookups
Best Escorts
Sex Vacation
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
click for FREE hookups

Thread: Seeking Arrangements

+ Add Report
Page 540 of 614 FirstFirst ... 40 440 490 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 590 ... LastLast
Results 8,086 to 8,100 of 9209
This blog is moderated by Psalyer
  1. #1124

    Strippers from SA Experiences?

    I've dated one who was cool but then she moved away. Now I am trying to date another but she is flaky as shit. I suppose I should know better LOL. We haven't met yet because she keeps cancelling on me. She stays up until 3-4 am every night and sends me these cryptic texts. She doesn't know what I look like so I could potentially just go be a patron at her club. Just curious if anyone has had any SA Stripper experiences good or bad?

  2. #1123
    Quote Originally Posted by Attwater  [View Original Post]
    Since I have been thrown off SA as well can someone post a pic of the Stoneham girl or somewhere else she might be advertising she sounds very familiar.

    Thanks.
    Thank you both.

  3. #1122
    Quote Originally Posted by Cheese4256  [View Original Post]
    I can second that experience. I was banned, signed up again with a different email address, but the same payment info, and was eventually banned again, then signed up a third time with another email address, but using different payment info not associated in any way with the previous payment info, and have so far had no trouble. I'm also much more careful about what I say, and try to move off-site as soon as possible with anyone I might be interested in. Even then, I ran into a nut case who said she was going to report me after we started talking details via text because she was offended by my use of explicit language, even though she claimed to have been a pornstar for 8 years.

    For what this opinion is worth, I think it's reasonable for SA to be aggressive with this sort of thing, since their entire business is at risk if they allow explicit use of language that could be interpreted as illegal. It's safer in the long run for them to lose a few paying members than to lose the whole shebang (pun intended). What I found frustrating, though, was that they were not particularly responsive to inquiries, didn't tell me exactly what I said that lead to the ban, and wouldn't even entertain the notion of a conversation with a person by phone to get clarification and to plead my case. Oh well.
    There is a much simpler explanation. That site is, like all the rest, simply put, just plain old crooked, and all about raking in your money, and nothing else. Their gestapo censorship and strong-arm policies exist simply to maximize their profits--nothing more and nothing less.

  4. #1121

    25 yr. Old Stoneham

    I had the same experience last month. Pleasant to communicate with but she wanted 500 and wouldn't move from that amount so I passed. Maybe YMMV.

    Quote Originally Posted by Longjblues  [View Original Post]
    She indicated her allowance requirement per meet was 500, and no matter how many times I have asked nicely, she hasn't moved.

    She is friendly enough to communicate with on SA, but she was firm with me on the 500. I think I remember her from BP or CL, but I am not sure about it.

  5. #1120

    BrunetteBaby6, Stoneham Area

    Here is her profile, as well as some pics. Not sure how the pics will turn out since they are screen shots. She refers to herself as Nikki.

    Quote Originally Posted by Attwater  [View Original Post]
    Since I have been thrown off SA as well can someone post a pic of the Stoneham girl or somewhere else she might be advertising she sounds very familiar.

    Thanks.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails StonehamProfile'18.jpg‎   Stoneham3.jpg‎   Stoneham2.jpg‎   Stoneham1.jpg‎  

  6. #1119

    Stoneham girl

    Quote Originally Posted by Attwater  [View Original Post]
    Since I have been thrown off SA as well can someone post a pic of the Stoneham girl or somewhere else she might be advertising she sounds very familiar.

    Thanks.
    Here she is.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails e167a44b-c440-4a0b-ab47-96978298ac42.jpg‎   a79c27b2-f386-444c-921a-8150c317e4ea.jpg‎   9d0e8ad4-0c25-4ff9-9993-54b41c902bbd.jpg‎  

  7. #1118

    Stoneham Girl

    Quote Originally Posted by Longjblues  [View Original Post]
    She indicated her allowance requirement per meet was 500, and no matter how many times I have asked nicely, she hasn't moved.

    She is friendly enough to communicate with on SA, but she was firm with me on the 500. I think I remember her from BP or CL, but I am not sure about it.
    Since I have been thrown off SA as well can someone post a pic of the Stoneham girl or somewhere else she might be advertising she sounds very familiar.

    Thanks.

  8. #1117
    Quote Originally Posted by BostonMan781  [View Original Post]
    Not true. I was banned on my IP but my friend who made an account with my computer has been able to access the site perfectly fine.
    I can second that experience. I was banned, signed up again with a different email address, but the same payment info, and was eventually banned again, then signed up a third time with another email address, but using different payment info not associated in any way with the previous payment info, and have so far had no trouble. I'm also much more careful about what I say, and try to move off-site as soon as possible with anyone I might be interested in. Even then, I ran into a nut case who said she was going to report me after we started talking details via text because she was offended by my use of explicit language, even though she claimed to have been a pornstar for 8 years.

    For what this opinion is worth, I think it's reasonable for SA to be aggressive with this sort of thing, since their entire business is at risk if they allow explicit use of language that could be interpreted as illegal. It's safer in the long run for them to lose a few paying members than to lose the whole shebang (pun intended). What I found frustrating, though, was that they were not particularly responsive to inquiries, didn't tell me exactly what I said that lead to the ban, and wouldn't even entertain the notion of a conversation with a person by phone to get clarification and to plead my case. Oh well.

  9. #1116

    25 yr old, stoneham, BrunetteBabby6

    She indicated her allowance requirement per meet was 500, and no matter how many times I have asked nicely, she hasn't moved.

    She is friendly enough to communicate with on SA, but she was firm with me on the 500. I think I remember her from BP or CL, but I am not sure about it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aardvarks  [View Original Post]
    Any intel on this one? 25 yr old from Stoneham.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/274d7...1-d075a26e0fab

  10. #1115

    That was bizarre

    Quote Originally Posted by Longjblues  [View Original Post]
    Hey Lord, check your search filters, particularly "Profile Text". You must have done a search or something, and its still limiting the search parameters. Thats why you are getting so little when you search on SA.

    I have noticed no change in the profiles on SA otherwise. Hope that helps.
    Idk what the hell I did. It was doing that for a day and I couldn't figure out why all the profiles were coming up wrong.

  11. #1114

    BrunetteBaby6

    Any intel on this one? 25 yr old from Stoneham.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/274d7...1-d075a26e0fab

  12. #1113

    Check your search filters!!

    Hey Lord, check your search filters, particularly "Profile Text". You must have done a search or something, and its still limiting the search parameters. Thats why you are getting so little when you search on SA.

    I have noticed no change in the profiles on SA otherwise. Hope that helps.

    Quote Originally Posted by LordOfThEeyes  [View Original Post]
    So it appears that most of all the profiles Got wiped from Seeking. I did a search and only a few accounts remain and clicking all the links in the thread yielded only the message not being active. So it looks like seeking is dead and gone.

  13. #1112

    Looks like seeking got purged

    So it appears that most of all the profiles Got wiped from Seeking. I did a search and only a few accounts remain and clicking all the links in the thread yielded only the message not being active. So it looks like seeking is dead and gone.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails B8206CA4-9F79-448D-8987-E60C9F6E6CA2.jpg‎  

  14. #1111

    Banning, IPs, Tracking etc

    Quote Originally Posted by HuksAlot  [View Original Post]
    Once a profile is banned SA tracks the associated IP address. Your Internet service provider issues you the same IP every time you access the Internet. Meaning that even creating a new SA profile with a different email address will get banned as well. You will have to run Tor or some other VPN software to hide your IP then create a new SA profile.
    I urge all of you to sign up for an anonymous VPN service on any device you use for mongering or whatever. It will get you out of anyone tracking your IP. Not just Sa, WYP, but FB, Amazon, etc. It's worth the $9 per month and it works. I use SaferVPN.

    Imagine you're browsing at home and all these data collection services track your browsing. Then your wife or SO gets a banner ad from one of your "interests".

  15. #1110
    Quote Originally Posted by CandyMan555  [View Original Post]
    If I set up a new account (I am banned) with my friends credit card when I log on can they tell it is me (who has been banned) ?

    Thanks This is painful Thanks CM.
    Not true. I was banned on my IP but my friend who made an account with my computer has been able to access the site perfectly fine.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Ava Escorts




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape