Thread: 2005 Archived Reports
Closed Thread
Results 91 to 105 of 261
-
10-01-05 13:13 #171
Posts: 41Originally Posted by Va Fun Tymes 2
I am only a window-shopper and never partake, but I remember from RTFF that a cardinal rule is NEVER EVER go to her spot.
-
10-01-05 13:09 #170
Posts: 41So we post on here that JD is dead and Chamberlaine is looking up and LEO is all over Chamberlaine within a couple days. Are we shooting ourselves in the foot?
-
10-01-05 11:26 #169
Posts: 11Day time notice on Chamberlayne
1 BSW, 1 WSW. Both on the little side street behind McDonalds. About 300pm. I never partake so that All I can say.
-
10-01-05 09:22 #168
Posts: 43Originally Posted by Max999
Green Shirt and blue jeans was a cop. They are taking people into the motels and making and arrest.
-
09-30-05 21:58 #167
Posts: 59The Chamberlayne Stroll
Friday, noon to about 2pm: no SWs seen.
-
09-28-05 07:55 #166
Posts: 510Originally Posted by Waterdog53
No digits - she's homeless. Dreamed I saw her again yesterday at about 3:30- north end of Chamberlayne almost to Azalea.
In the dream I went all out....paid 20 for a room at the Alpine Motel on Brook. Teresa spent a good long half hour polishing; rubbing and thouroughly cleaning my unit. Very; very nice effort on her part.
-
09-28-05 07:10 #165
Posts: 212Originally Posted by Casey Jones
-
09-27-05 10:06 #164
Posts: 510Originally Posted by Waterdog53
Yes it is - still kickin myself for not asking for digits.
Rode home on Chamberlayne last night around 5:30 and saw what appeared to be a decent looking light skinned SW just south of the intersection at Laburnum. She waved but I didn't have time play.
-
09-27-05 07:16 #163
Posts: 212Theresa?
Originally Posted by Casey Jones
WD
-
09-26-05 23:47 #162
Posts: 235suzanne
Was northbound on jd from sun and found this wsw at sisco & jd. Stopped to check her out and she hopped right in. As we proceed to find a spot she says she is 43. She has light brown hair. We park and she gets right to work (as soon as I forked over .2) BBBJ everything is ok then I get her to take her top off and it's a boob job gone bad. Said she had filler removed. (cut out) & left nipple is gone. Oh well I continued to enjoy her services til I busted a nut (catch and spit) and then I took her back to jd. Good overall but not a looker though.
Z
-
09-26-05 19:33 #161
Posts: 723Mucho Gracias. I know he had stumbled across got girls on the net, and was seriously considering using them if he ends up going.
He'll be glad to know the score ahead of time on them.
-
09-26-05 18:09 #160
Posts: 41I was driving by JD on business today and noted that the only providers visible were rather grey haired. Another loop around the Walmsley to Bells area brought a couple of wsw out of the woodwork. One was a 6 on the sw scale, the other was a 4.
I went on back toward work and stopped at a Big Lots. While parking I noted a blonde coming out and I guess I must have still been in hunting mode because when I looked at her she gave me "the look" right back. She would be a 7 on the sw scale. I was already late, so the possibilities were not explored.
-
09-26-05 07:15 #159
Posts: 212Got Girls
Originally Posted by Almighty
-
09-25-05 23:29 #158
Posts: 723Originally Posted by Waterdog53
-
09-24-05 14:04 #157
Posts: 122The long delay between pressing the button and actually getting the picture is a common problem with earlier and/or less-expensive digital cameras. (Weak batteries can cause it to get a little worse, but batteries are not the cause of this - it's a function of the camera's design.) Most higher-end digitals will have a "quick-shot" mode, but generally the camera needs a little time to measure the light and establish the exposure and focus, so the shots you take in this mode hurriedly while driving are unlikely to be very good. A really good camera (Canon Rebel EOS, Nikon 70, etc) can do it, but who wants to be trolling the stroll with a camera in the car that costs half a G-note?
If you want a camera for this particular job, review the cameras you're considering for the shortest shutter delay. But don't expect your current camera to get materially better at this.
Originally Posted by Waterdog53