|
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
-
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Demand
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
Yeah right . . . If they gave a shit about stopping trafficking, they wouldn't be all over SKG like flies on shit and would focus their efforts elsewhere. . .
Yost's focus on STG is driven in large part by non-profits.
https://endsexualexploitation.org/about/
https://endsexualexploitation.org/ar...x-trafficking/#_edn1.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Johns
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
Yeah right . . . Nobodys forcing them into it but themselves, and you know what? they are grown, they can do what they want thats their business . . .
Much of current theory on sex trafficking suggests it exists because a significant number of men are willing to pay for sex with women.
The argument is simple economic logic – without demand, an industry falls apart.
https://portcitydaily.com/local-news...cking-problem/
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Yeah right, "curb the incentive to exploit women" when they go and bilk fines out of them with soliciting charges for doing what they want with their bodies. Seems like that's the courts exploiting them to me. If they gave a shit about stopping trafficking, they wouldn't be all over SKG like flies on shit and would focus their efforts elsewhere. SKG is filled with women that are either doing it to support their families, or maybe have a drug habit. Nobodys forcing them into it but themselves, and you know what? they are grown, they can do what they want thats their business. Its all political and those caught in the stings are nothing but potential pawns for Yost to try to get himself re elected. They don't give a flying shit about their taxpayers or any of their residents for that matter.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Just Say No?
Originally Posted by Cumshot19
[View Original Post]
Here's a novel idea, stop shooting heroin. You know what that leads to? Keeping a job. Not going to jail. Not contracting infections that lead to losing limbs.
Despite the good intentions, the "Just Say No" anti-drug marketing campaign started by Nancy Reagan was not as effective as it could have been.
An abstinence-only approach, coupled with harsher drug penalties, had negligible effect in preventing drug abuse.
https://landmarkrecovery.com/just-sa...d-its-effects/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2636541/
-
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Reducing demand for prostitution
Originally Posted by DeskJockey
[View Original Post]
. . . why is is not legit for women to sell their bodies and take care of themselves?
In theory, laws against prostitution are intended to protect public health and welfare (including the suppression of sexually transmitted diseases), protect minors who might otherwise become involved in the sex industry, thwart other associated forms of crime, and curb the incentive to exploit women.
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/...and-prevention
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1762352/
-
Troll, just add me to your ignore list.
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by DeskJockey
[View Original Post]
Awesome post. Courts provide remedies, not justice. The remedies serve the court and the justice system (there is no justice system, its a for profit system designed for and by the government). Its a clusterfuck.
Here's a novel idea, stop shooting heroin. You know what that leads to? Keeping a job. Not going to jail. Not contracting infections that lead to losing limbs.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 248
Government is the problem, not the solution
Originally Posted by Chunks92
[View Original Post]
Eloquently said, here is mine. You ever watch Morgan Freeman in lean on me? You don't have to watch the whole thing, just this brief few second clip attached for this line.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWpAJ4Lcu4Q
At the end of the day, they are branded as felons and put in the cages the elite have crafted for them, and no matter how hard they try, they can't make enough money at the jobs they can get as felons so they fall right back into addiction. Representing the cages that Morgan Freeman deserved everyone to be freed from. The difference between addiction and non addiction is all about environment. If people were all living comfortably and not worried about how to pay for necessities, all of this suffering would be non-existent. Here is an article that proves just that. Decriminalize.
https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/vie...bout-addiction
C92.
Awesome post. Courts provide remedies, not justice. The remedies serve the court and the justice system (there is no justice system, its a for profit system designed for and by the government). Its a clusterfuck.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 248
Unrestrained capitalism is evil
Originally Posted by PopGarden10
[View Original Post]
The issue here is also racism and unrestrained capitalism. The fact this country was built under slavery and prison is the new slavery. They need people to fill up prison cells so allowing drugs and prostitution works against that goal.
I hear you. When it is legit for the government (through lobbying, campaign contributions, propaganda, money over everything, party before nation) and corporations (monopoly, stealing, underpaying employees. Etc) to practice unrestrained capitalism, why is is not legit for women to sell their bodies and take care of themselves?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 144
Smoothie
Originally Posted by Cumshot19
[View Original Post]
You Hague's are all morons. Decriminalize drugs. Yeah, OK. While we're at it, let's put more guns in schools to stop school shootings. Let's arm the kids and give them heroin. You guys go to great lengths to defend junkie ******. Junkie ****** are not even human.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw08N8huTDE
-
Troll, just add me to your ignore list.
Posts: 49
You Hague's are all morons. Decriminalize drugs. Yeah, OK. While we're at it, let's put more guns in schools to stop school shootings. Let's arm the kids and give them heroin. You guys go to great lengths to defend junkie ******. Junkie ****** are not even human.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 768
Originally Posted by Budd2
[View Original Post]
Religion has always been the problem. One side wants to make God our Government, the other side wants to make Government our God. The only way to protect religious freedom is to keep government out of it. Unfortunately too many Americans do not belive in Separation of Church and State and the battle to legislate religion on one side and restrict religious freedoms on the other side will continue. We can't just live and let live.
As much as I'm not a fan of religion that's not just it in the us. There are places in the world that are more religious than the us. They allow prostitution and drugs or at least permit them without heavily trying to penalize their existence. The issue here is also racism and unrestrained capitalism. The fact this country was built under slavery and prison is the new slavery. They need people to fill up prison cells so allowing drugs and prostitution works against that goal.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1078
Many Americans
Originally Posted by Budd2
[View Original Post]
Religion has always been the problem. One side wants to make God our Government, the other side wants to make Government our God. The only way to protect religious freedom is to keep government out of it. Unfortunately too many Americans do not belive in Separation of Church and State and the battle to legislate religion on one side and restrict religious freedoms on the other side will continue. We can't just live and let live.
Agree with everything you said, just expanding on it. Many Americans would not be so supportive if they did their research beyond what they see in the news and look at the docket sheets for what really happens, not just in the hobby, but various other stuff as well. All of the "Karens" (and the male name equivalent of them) out there who go to Church on Sundays, pretend to be anti hooker, and pretend to be a do gooder, and then go abuse their server or cashier at the grocery store right after, would not be so supportive of being anti hooker if they realized they themselves have higher odds of walking into one of these stings then guys like us who have hobbied for years do LOL. Think about it, we have lived and breathed this shit, me and you Budd know a bogus post soon as it goes up, meanwhile some phony anti hooker dumbass like we discussed gets horny some random night, goes on SKG not knowing what he is doing, and picks a sting ad doing no research and gets an Eng in prostitution charge. All of a sudden magically they wouldn't be so supportive of being anti hooker. Same goes for these clown politicians trying to overturn Roe Vs Wade. They are all hypocrites with no scruples.
C92.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 882
Religion, legalization
These two areas are also big problems. Religion's beliefs are primarily (in reality) to control people thru fear of spending eternity in hell. A fantasy created by religionists that cannot be proven or disproven due to its nature. And, women support it because religion attempts to control the natural and biological desires of men.
Legalization in piecemeal fashion will never work because the other governments, state and federal, won't legalize drugs, and even if they did they would and will tax the hell out of it, just like alcohol and tobacco. If the government would just get the hell out of restricting drugs, and I mean local, state, AND federal, the problem would naturally decrease.
No smuggling. No gang wars over turf. No dealers glorifying drug use in order to increase their profit.
That wouldn't mean people wouldn't still use drugs. Always have always will. However, it would cost so much less to be able to buy whatever from your local pharmacy that crime would be dramatically reduced. After all, many men are addicts and they steal and do whatever they have to do to support their habits. Also, purity would be controlled, and for those who want to get off drugs their would be so much money available from the savings of not having hundreds of thousands in prison that it wouldn't be a problem.
Cheech.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1269
100% correct
Originally Posted by Asmoth
[View Original Post]
The problem is as described by the admin and cheech but also tied to one other thing in politics.
Religion.
We have too many politicians who dictate that sex is bad and paying for it is against the ideals of a made up rule book from ancient history.
This is just one of the examples of why they shouldn't allow religion to have any sway in politics and need to actually SEPARATE church and state from one another.
If they didn't have to pander to the all these religious groups they wouldn't give two shits ultimately about hookers and johns fucking.
Religion has always been the problem. One side wants to make God our Government, the other side wants to make Government our God. The only way to protect religious freedom is to keep government out of it. Unfortunately too many Americans do not belive in Separation of Church and State and the battle to legislate religion on one side and restrict religious freedoms on the other side will continue. We can't just live and let live.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 59
Portland is latest example of why legalization fails.
There always seems an excuse or reason for failure. Until some city can be successful in legalizing drugs and not end up killing a bunch of people or increasing crime, I can't support it. I don't believe governments have the ability to manage anything well. Feel free to identify any successful transition for legalized drugs.
Originally Posted by Admin2
[View Original Post]
What went wrong in Portland was they passed decriminalization without the healthcare system being ready. This is what happens when an entire country decides to treat addiction as a health care issue and not a criminal issue.
https://transformdrugs.org/blog/drug...ecord-straight
FYI "forced stays in rehab" is just a different kind of jail. Before Harry Anslinger made up all the lies about drugs and got them criminalized so he could get a job people used to be able to walk into a drug store and buy what they wanted, then they went home and took it and went to work the next day. I've been sober forever, availability of drugs doesn't make addicts, lack of community and childhood trauma is what creates addicts.
Before you throw out the next "but I don't want to pay for their drugs" line, for what you are currently spending to jail addicts you could give every junkie in the world all the dope they would ever use plus give them a place to live and still spend less tax payer money. It wouldn't be as satisfying as knowing you were locking those scumbags up but it would be less money.
A2.
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|