Starting New Threads

[Double Nickle]

The current system seems perfect. With top level forums/subforums/threads administrator generated only we do not have clutter from member started threads. With the admin started threads first on the lower levels we do not need to scroll down to see member started threads if we don't want to. With member generated threads in order by latest posting we generally will not have to scroll down to see the one we want.

I've made specific suggestions elsewhere on possible changes in admin level threads. Another idea would be to have doublets/triplets. You could have massage parlor reports as a head with massage parlor reports again as a subhead and individual massage parlors, AMPs, Russian MPs etc as other subheads. This would be a bit unwieldy as a person just wanting to see general massage parlor reports would have to click an extra time. But if you had Massage Parlor Reports side by side with Massage Parlor Reports subthreads that would be easy to navigate.

My only problems navigating are looking for threads that don't but should exist and hunting through threads that could be divided. I spent eons looking for US Reports of Distinction threads. I dread looking for massage parlor reports in a large general reports thread consisting mostly of streetwalker reports. I'm going to try to help solve this in 48 days when I should become a senior member, but current senior members and our highly esteemed administrator could think about doing something now if they have any spare seconds weighing heavily on their hands.

Double Nickle

[Best Tx Monger]

I know that when I was a rookie I accidentally started a thread. Those were not my intentions but nonetheless it occured and I do regret it.

I think that the forum severely lacks more variation in members. It is either you are rich or poor, meaning that you are either a Senior or Regular.

With all honesty and sincerity, I think power shoulb be bestowed to Senior members to start new threads, ONLY. I just find it rather unjustifiable that a lurker out the blue signs up and can get a new thread going.

-007

[Wallie]

I'm sure that people in bigger cities have a perceived need to start a new thread on a particular subject/area they have information about. Maybe they do. NYC definately has a ton of threads. I'm not from there, so I won't judge their usefulness; but, I know that I would find it frustrating to find information if I had to check out 20 threads every day just to keep up with the information flowing into the Forum. I'm betting others agree with that. I like the idea that there are only a preset number of Admin determined threads available. That way, all the info for an area is together and easy to find. Sure, you may have to read a number of posts that don't mean anything to you, but is that harder than jumping from thread to thread to keep up to date? I doubt it. Relevant, pre-determined threads are easy, and neater for the look, and info flow of the board IMHO.

If the ability to start threads continues to exist, and I'm not saying it shouldn't per se, then I think they ability should only be availble to Senior Members (or whatever the "Top Level" members are to be called if that changes in the future). Limiting the capability to start a thread would probably help to ensure that the new threads are relevant. I don't think Regular Members should have the privilige to start new threads at all.

Judging from the other posts in this thread, it appears that some people just can't resist the urge to start a new thread. I guess they have a need to see their name in type as an "originator" of something. Hizark21 started a SW thread in my home area (Indianapolis, Indiana) even though he has never posted in the main thread, or even replied to his own new thread.

In general, I think the abilility to start a thread of your own is probably unneeded, and would not be missed much if it went away. If it does remain, then again, I think the privilige of starting a thread should be limited to trusted, Senior Members only.

Wallie

[Layin Pipe]

Tried to call Garden Spa but number not in service.The ladys are older but the massage is very good. always had good time with Ann. Any info if closed for good and reason why?

Hey! Has anyone out there seen Tulsa? BSW, kinda heavy, dark skinned! She is usually on cleveland ave between oakland park and farris!

I agree with Gpiper! Newbies first need to learn to post in the proper threads before being allowed to start new threads.

[Gpiper]

New members should not be allowed to start new threads!

[IntotheMuck]

The threads are bad news. I know it's more work, but I'm seeing pointless threads popping up all over the Manhattan section. They appear to be getting virtually ZERO responses and many simply belong in the "General Threads" section.

It's becoming a drag to search through all the different threads.

Jackson, If you allow these threads to survive with just a few postings required over a six month period, we will be overrun.

You should be in charge of this with greater enforcement.

[rmart3ster]

Hey! Has anyone out there seen Tulsa? BSW, kinda heavy, dark skinned! She is usually on cleveland ave between oakland park and farris!

[Forth Ryte]

I'm against the ability of anyone to start new threads.

In the Manhattan board, there are now threads for AMPs, Craig's List Reviews, Incall and other specifc topics, which is GOOD. But the are also half a dozen overlapping threads covering the street scene. In addition the the "General Reports" there is now "Streetwalkers", "Streetwalkers in NYC" "Friday Night" covering the street scene on that particular night of the week, "Saturday Night/Sunday Morning" covering a different night and even threads about individual SWs.

To keep up with whats happening in the area, I have to read through several threads one at a time.

I raised this topic on the Manhattan board and several agreed with me but said they had inadvertently started new threads because is was confusing. So I conclude that it is too easy to do and not helpful.

One man's personal opinion.

[Ricky Raccoon]

Jackson,
could you please delete a thread I started called "Dozens of SW's". I was on the wrong page, then clicked the wrong button. It is located in the Maryland section, within Baltimore. Thank you.

Ricky

[Almighty]

Well, maybe its because where I post, there's not much craziness, but I would argue that new threads are not needed.

Broken down by the relevant cities, and of course, the catch all "other areas" works fine for the WV board....

IMO, sometimes less is more. Changing the entire set up of the boards by allowing threads to be started, just so you can clean up a couple of troublesome boards, seems like overkill.

[Blueyz]

I haven't been to EL since the last decade. I think it got closed down a couple of times. I would like to try it out because I prefer women of color. But is it safe for an older white guy to go there? I have heard that some thugs like to hang out there and the last thing I want is trouble. What is the acceptable price for a full vip treatment there. I pay 40 to 50 on street plus room. Are the rates the same there?

[pandianni]

Hey man,

I was in Egypt and I fuck some girls I never fuck like them. You have to visit this country, you will like it.

Hi Pandianni,

I have another forum specifically for international travel, which includes a big section for Egypt. This forum is located at:

http://www.worldsexguide.info

Thanks,

Jackson

[Wasserratte]

O.K., I admit that I have not posted in a long time. Can anyone please tell me how to start a new post for the commonwealth of Saipan?

Thank you.

[baseball1068]

Hey Guys,

New member, but have been "around". Nice to see some familiar names. Has anyone been to New Look on Harlem near Milwaukee?

BB

[Member #2984]

I would like to have my original username. After being upgraded to Senior member was given this Member #2984. How can I get it changed back? Any suggestions appreciate Jackson.

Thanks.