Bareback Providers

[BobLoblah]

Molly's website is down. Can someone shoot me a PM to let me know what it said?

You can find the cached copy still on Google: https://webcache.googleusercontent.c....com/our-story+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.

"Update!

Due to health issues, I will no longer be providing VIP, GFE, or anything unsafe. Rates can be negotiated per client. ".

[Bobby ShafToe]

Her website has (alarming) updates posted recently. Link is on her TNA profile and on reviews there.

Molly's website is down. Can someone shoot me a PM to let me know what it said?

[ZeroFucks]

Check out her website regarding her latest message up top. May tell some of the story.

It looks like her website is down. Can anyone share an overview of exactly what it was?

Feel free to PM.

[YourFacee]

You may get an unenthusiastic BBBJ if you're really lucky. Those slu / eastlake girls may be pretty hot but they all have wildly overinflated egos and hobbyists should avoid seeing them simply to avoid puffing them up any further. Add to that the rumors about hidden cameras and I'd advise staying far far away.

Oh no no no. Hidden cameras? No thanks. Point taken, avoiding.

[Sticknmove]

https://escortindex.com/ad/tacoma/20...0534/49/521139

She is in Shoreline area now. I posted review and pics here. Haven't seen her in awhile. She's nice but about her business. Great ass! Huge rack. She let's you pretty much have your way for $ on top of her regular rate it's open season. No CIP. I'm sure you can negotiate. Fun girl. Haven't seen her in some time, if one of you guys does it would be great to hear if anything's changed. She can be a lot of fun.

[Jonderin]

Maybe she caught something serious because of her high volume, that's why now I only see low volume providers.

Look at her website.

https://mmolly206.squarespace.com/our-story

Website seems to be down. What did it say? Thanks for the money, better go get checked?

[Sticknmove]

http://everett.skipthegames.com/fema...d/288689147394

Really nice, pretty face, great body, and skills. Sadly she informed me over text that she no longer provides the BBFS option. I wonder what happened to pull it off the menu and I also wonder how adamant about it she is? She was one of my favs.

[NotReally]

Any info on her?

https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?1793696-#128142-128142-Perfect-tall-lean-athletic-body-128068-128069-128068-Low-volume-128142-128142-Don-t-miss-out!10084;%EF%B8%8 F❤%EF%B8%8 F.

You may get an unenthusiastic BBBJ if you're really lucky. Those slu / eastlake girls may be pretty hot but they all have wildly overinflated egos and hobbyists should avoid seeing them simply to avoid puffing them up any further. Add to that the rumors about hidden cameras and I'd advise staying far far away.

[BernardoCarpio]

http://tacoma.skipthegames.com/femal...l/131558974406

When I first saw her, she only charges $75 hh $120 hr. Now she charges $175/ hh and 300 hr?

Whoever told her that she can raise her rates like ruined it!

[Member #6044]

Any info on her?

https://www.tnaboard.com/showthread.php?1793696-#128142-128142-Perfect-tall-lean-athletic-body-128068-128069-128068-Low-volume-128142-128142-Don-t-miss-out!10084;%EF%B8%8 F❤%EF%B8%8 F.

[Petey23]

Older MILF type. Offers BBBJ. I have no idea about BBFS. She had a younger daughter who was in her early twenties that was always open for BBFS, and she was an excellent provider. I miss her lots. .

Says on her website that she does BBFS w / cip and cia for 140 HH for one shot and 200 HR with two shots.

[RawDogger]

Well, she's not very good at math. https://sxyfullfiguredredhd.escortbook.com/rates.

Older MILF type. Offers BBBJ. I have no idea about BBFS. She had a younger daughter who was in her early twenties that was always open for BBFS, and she was an excellent provider. I miss her lots..

[Muree3]

Low volume is just marketing. It's a way for a provider to jack up rates and make you feel like you're getting something exclusive. It's not anything you can verify and what exactly does it mean? What's the number of clients per week that indicates low, medium, or high volume?

Since there is no real way for us to be sure about how many clients a provider sees during any period of time you're just as likely to get the drips from one that markets herself as low volume as you are one you think is high volume. Because the terms aren't even definable the 'low volume' provider might actually see as many or more as other providers. All I'm saying is don't think your chances are any different with provider X than provider why. Because there are a lot of unknown variables you have to assume any risk (rob, flake, catching something) is the same from them all.

That being said, I do think it's correct to assume SWs are likely to be higher volume than most who are advertising and setting up meetings online so I treat them like an exception to the above viewpoint.

Low volume for me are the ladies that don't bb the first time, and ask for test results as I do too.

I know the risk that I'm taking, but at least I do a research before doing bb to a lady, and everything is fine till now.

After I caught C from molly I avoid ladies like her and her friends that allow everybody to bb without any screening, they are hot but for me they don't worth the pain.

That is my opinion.

[BbFunTimes]

Hey, long time lurker, haven't seen anyone talk about this lady. Is she legit or should I stay away?

http://seattle.skipthegames.com/fema...h/811873865646

https://sxyfullfiguredredhd.escortbook.com/

Older MILF type. Offers BBBJ. I have no idea about BBFS. She had a younger daughter who was in her early twenties that was always open for BBFS, and she was an excellent provider. I miss her lots. .

[RawDogger]

that's why now I only see low volume providers.

Low volume is just marketing. It's a way for a provider to jack up rates and make you feel like you're getting something exclusive. It's not anything you can verify and what exactly does it mean? What's the number of clients per week that indicates low, medium, or high volume?

Since there is no real way for us to be sure about how many clients a provider sees during any period of time you're just as likely to get the drips from one that markets herself as low volume as you are one you think is high volume. Because the terms aren't even definable the 'low volume' provider might actually see as many or more as other providers. All I'm saying is don't think your chances are any different with provider X than provider why. Because there are a lot of unknown variables you have to assume any risk (rob, flake, catching something) is the same from them all.

That being said, I do think it's correct to assume SWs are likely to be higher volume than most who are advertising and setting up meetings online so I treat them like an exception to the above viewpoint.