Bareback Providers

**FastBreak Junk** · 06-25-19 23:58

Originally Posted by PaoloGuerrero9 [View Original Post]

Literally every single girl in STG looks sketchy and disgusting. TNA might be full of prudes, but you get quality girls. I recommend slixa or Eros if you don't want to deal with it.

How many girls in STG could you say are the level of Emily, Molly, Claire doll, etc? Name one. That's right, zero.

Originally Posted by Michael1967 [View Original Post]

That's strange because half the women I see on STG are on TNA.

Originally Posted by Jimbo666 [View Original Post]

As far as skipthegames goes I got a legit 9/10 from there for cheap.

Michael is right: there's significant overlap on not only STG and TNA but other sites as well which makes sense; if providers wants to make money it makes sense for them to market themselves on several sites.

As for overall looks, yes STG does seem to be lower than TNA, but as I've written before service and value is more important to me than looks. I haven't seen any STG provides I'd rate as high as 9 like Jimbo, but I've seen several in the 6-7 range who provide good to great service for what I consider reasonable prices (generally about $150-225). To find such providers, admittedly you have to sift through lots of scammers and gross skanks.

Speaking of which, this provider stated she'd do bbfs via text, but it won't be with me. Check out one of her vag pixs. There appear to be little flakes skin. At least I hope it's skin and not something worse...

http://bellingham.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/have-your-fantasies-become-rea/120832003908

**DrtyHarry** · 06-25-19 23:14

Originally Posted by FatRichard [View Original Post]

See my post in the Atlanta "BBBJ & BBFS" thread, posted 11-18-17 13:17 (#3112), here:

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...476&viewfull=1#post3625476.

Dick.

I have used a lot of lamb skin in my day. And have used the same strategy with great success. Almost none of them will agree to it. Lamb skin really feels very different and is the closest thing to BB (according to me). BTW just so everyone is aware. LS will prevent pregnancy but is not safe for STD transmission, I. E. Most bacteria and viruses can pass through a Lamb Skin condom. I was willing / preferred to BB her anyway so that was not of concern.

**AK6571** · 06-25-19 22:19

She seems to be no longer posting. Is she out of the business or what?

**CreamPieSeeker** · 06-25-19 19:33

Fat Richard, you are my hero!

Originally Posted by FatRichard [View Original Post]

See my post in the Atlanta "BBBJ & BBFS" thread, posted 11-18-17 13:17 (#3112), here:

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...476&viewfull=1#post3625476.

Dick.

**Jimbo666** · 06-25-19 15:56

I saw her on Sunday and it was quite a mixed bag. For what she charges I wouldn't see her again. We agreed on a certain time and even though she was 15 minutes late she took it out of the session so I only got like 40 minutes. She was hammered drunk and would periodically stop to drink more whiskey. Wouldn't let me cum on her face as she hasn't done her make up yet and cim wasn't a option. Would only let me cum in her ass but about 30 minutes in she tightened up and I could only get in her pussy which she made me pull out of. She asked me to go down on her and she didn't smell great either so I just slapped her snatch a few times and stopped. The little time that was great was awesome. Pounding her in the ass bare, choking, slapping her around, and pulling her hair so hard I'm surprised she didn't go bald was pure bliss, but everything else especially for the price makes her a obvious ds.

As far as skipthegames goes I got a legit 9/10 from there for cheap. Perfect body, real firm tits, great ass, had to use a condom but she took it from every angle for an hour straight. Rode me hard and really got into 69. Blonde and rotates between here and Portland. I'll post her contact info on here if I see her again. For 200 bucks she was fantastic even with a rubber.

**Fat Richard** · 06-25-19 13:15

Originally Posted by SeattleCasual [View Original Post]

Her profile says she's against BB anything. How did you bring it up?

See my post in the Atlanta "BBBJ & BBFS" thread, posted 11-18-17 13:17 (#3112), here:

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...476&viewfull=1#post3625476.

Dick.

**Michael1967** · 06-25-19 12:03

Originally Posted by PaoloGuerrero9 [View Original Post]

Literally every single girl in STG looks sketchy and disgusting. TNA might be full of prudes, but you get quality girls. I recommend slixa or Eros if you don't want to deal with it.

How many girls in STG could you say are the level of Emily, Molly, Claire doll, etc? Name one. That's right, zero.

That's strange because half the women I see on STG are on TNA.

**ZeroFucks** · 06-25-19 11:53

Originally Posted by FastBreakJunk [View Original Post]

That's one of the reasons I don't post on TNA. Like so many other message boards too often it's just a place for both hobbyists and providers to berate and complain to each other. I like STG because it's simpler and easier to use, though there seem to be more scammers than on TNA.

Originally Posted by PaoloGuerrero9 [View Original Post]

Literally every single girl in STG looks sketchy and disgusting. TNA might be full of prudes, but you get quality girls. I recommend slixa or Eros if you don't want to deal with it.

How many girls in STG could you say are the level of Emily, Molly, Claire doll, etc? Name one. That's right, zero.

I'm with PaoloG on this one. TNA's crowd-sourced reviews and vouching system, even with all its flaws, is one of the best out there. That attracts premium providers who know it's a good place to do business. Yes the preachy bs they are always whining about is dumb, but every community has its boundaries and norms that you have to live with. It's a small penance to pay. I've had to deal with significantly more flakes and frauds on other sites.

Slixa and Eros have decent quality, but them b*es cost too damn much. LOL.

**Member #6048** · 06-25-19 10:49

Originally Posted by RonuldRaygun [View Original Post]

Whom are you referring to?

I assume Leilanni Moore.

But Companion Estella is chiming in too when she does BBFS.

It's weird that these girls pretend to be repulsed by BBFS when anyone can come to this site and see they offer it.

**DrtyHarry** · 06-25-19 10:45

Originally Posted by WhiteJohnson [View Original Post]

Did you guys see the hypocritical comments on the BBFS thread by one of tna's most well known BBFS providers?

What a stupid *****. Everyone knows she will bareback her sugardaddies.

It's funny some of the women that responded are also known to provide BBFS. Such hypocrasy. But who cares, I have stopped reading those BB threads, everyone knows the menu for all providers is YMMV. The menu listed is only the starting point for the negotiation.

**PaoloGuerrero9** · 06-25-19 02:56

Originally Posted by FastBreakJunk [View Original Post]

I just ask in my initial text inquiry. Typically if they are adamantly opposed they won't respond at all, otherwise they will politely say 'no'. Some times her answer is straight up 'yes', but usually it's a YMMV response like, 'if I feel comfortable with you', etc.

I think you might have answered your own question. Her ad is vague and her pix are prettier than a typical STG poster, so I wouldn't risk it, but that's me.

That's one of the reasons I don't post on TNA. Like so many other message boards too often it's just a place for both hobbyists and providers to berate and complain to each other. I like STG because it's simpler and easier to use, though there seem to be more scammers than on TNA.

Literally every single girl in STG looks sketchy and disgusting. TNA might be full of prudes, but you get quality girls. I recommend slixa or Eros if you don't want to deal with it.

How many girls in STG could you say are the level of Emily, Molly, Claire doll, etc? Name one. That's right, zero.

**SirisuXX** · 06-25-19 01:39

Any word on where she is these days?

Originally Posted by WebbHoes [View Original Post]

Did a quick hh with her.

No upcharge for bbfscip.

**FastBreak Junk** · 06-25-19 01:20

Originally Posted by LeftEye [View Original Post]

Do most of you typically ask for BBFS over text / PMs or in person?

Have you noticed if one yields more success than the other?

Thinking of asking someone I've met on multiple occasions.

I just ask in my initial text inquiry. Typically if they are adamantly opposed they won't respond at all, otherwise they will politely say 'no'. Some times her answer is straight up 'yes', but usually it's a YMMV response like, 'if I feel comfortable with you', etc.

Originally Posted by BernardoCarpio [View Original Post]

http://tacoma.skipthegames.com/femal...s/578682313337

This girl legit? I texted her and gave me the same address that tried to rob me before.

I think you might have answered your own question. Her ad is vague and her pix are prettier than a typical STG poster, so I wouldn't risk it, but that's me.

Originally Posted by WhiteJohnson [View Original Post]

Did you guys see the hypocritical comments on the BBFS thread by one of tna's most well known BBFS providers?

That's one of the reasons I don't post on TNA. Like so many other message boards too often it's just a place for both hobbyists and providers to berate and complain to each other. I like STG because it's simpler and easier to use, though there seem to be more scammers than on TNA.

**RonuldRaygun** · 06-25-19 00:40

Whom are you referring to?

Originally Posted by WhiteJohnson [View Original Post]

Did you guys see the hypocritical comments on the BBFS thread by one of tna's most well known BBFS providers?

What a stupid *****. Everyone knows she will bareback her sugardaddies and any black guy she meets.

**WhiteJohnson** · 06-25-19 00:04

Did you guys see the hypocritical comments on the BBFS thread by one of tna's most well known BBFS providers?

What a stupid *****. Everyone knows she will bareback her sugardaddies.