The Raleigh area "Sugar Bowl" (SA, WYP, SD4 ME)

**Hiamey** · 09-26-20 07:55

Originally Posted by jobobtheclown [View Original Post]

Anyone recognize her? Pics look familiar. Wants a shopping trip as a M&G, which I've never done before.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2c918...6-1efabdd3ed1f

I would not mind taking her on a shopping trip. Just let her know your upper limit. She messaged me on SA but I have not renewed for this month so I can't reply her. Let her know others are interested if she is ok with you sharing her number privately.

**jobobtheclown** · 09-25-20 22:43

Anyone recognize her? Pics look familiar. Wants a shopping trip as a M&G, which I've never done before.

https://www.seeking.com/member/2c918...6-1efabdd3ed1f

**Hiamey** · 09-24-20 12:15

I do agree with DJprofessorK regarding " I'm still shocked at the number of women from 'good homes' who are more than willing to dream for dollars". I wake up in the morning and I look myself in the mirror and am not proud of my looks. Hahaha. And I wonder Why all these beautiful young ones who are willing to play with me for $$. They say mone7 can't buy you love. But it sure can buy you a beautiful college girl for a few months.

**DJprofessorK** · 09-24-20 08:29

Originally Posted by Donatello [View Original Post]

I understand somewhat during the beginning of Covid, when everyone was on lockdown, but c'Mon.! SA doesn't give a sh#& about monitoring these girls or their profiles. They even clearly list this as a legit reason to report and block a user.

I suspect that SA is willing to overlook blatant violations of the TOS because a fresh rotation of women is what keeps men subscribing. Not to mention, I don't feel like men really bother to report women's profiles who do such things, they just move on. SA can claim that they don't have the personnel to scrub each and every profile, even when many girls' profiles explicit say, 'I want online only'. It's plausible deniability. I've also seen some forum members suggest that many of the 'online only' girls simply say that in order to ward off the obvious creeps. I know in the past, I've seen a few girls who just wanted to text / send pics when they realized that I could carry on a decent conversation, was normal, and didn't hound them for intimacy immediately. That number is low, but it's possible. All in all, I'm still shocked at the number of women from 'good homes' who are more than willing to dream for dollars.

**ShawnHello402** · 09-23-20 22:32

https://www.seeking.com/member/422f4...2-4bec75683c27

Anyone met her, seems like a cute normal girl.

**Donatello** · 09-23-20 21:18

Originally Posted by jobobtheclown [View Original Post]

I suspect there's a lot who think it's an online-only thing because they see other girls do it, but thankfully, I'm not sure it's a successful strategy. Talking to a few girls who just started the site, they've all had the comment "wow people REALLY don't want to do online stuff. " I think they've had some people blow up at them at the suggestion.

I understand somewhat during the beginning of Covid, when everyone was on lockdown, but c'Mon.! SA doesn't give a sh#& about monitoring these girls or their profiles. They even clearly list this as a legit reason to report and block a user.

**VincentCor74** · 09-23-20 20:14

Originally Posted by DevSugDad [View Original Post]

I hold the bags like s gentlemen and kept everything in my car. She had emergency so I politely ask her to meet tomorrow and she can collect it then.

Lmao. Man, what I wouldn't have given to see the look on her face.

**jobobtheclown** · 09-23-20 18:02

I suspect there's a lot who think it's an online-only thing because they see other girls do it, but thankfully, I'm not sure it's a successful strategy. Talking to a few girls who just started the site, they've all had the comment "wow people REALLY don't want to do online stuff. " I think they've had some people blow up at them at the suggestion.

**DevSugDad** · 09-23-20 16:10

Originally Posted by VincentCor74 [View Original Post]

"It begs the question, who are these idiots who are handing over 100's of dollars for video chats?

The same ones who put deposits down for escorts to "get the room", etc.

Full disclosure. I've been "rinsed" in person -- a shopping trip as a meet and greet with a promise of fun at the end only for her to have to rush off because her "kid is sick at school".

PT Barnum was definitely right. "There's a sucker born every minute. " I know, because I've been the sucker. LOL.

As far as paying for video / pics, etc -- people used to pay monthly fees for internet porn, so there ya go

I hold the bags like s gentlemen and kept everything in my car. She had emergency so I politely ask her to meet tomorrow and she can collect it then.

**VincentCor74** · 09-23-20 14:54

Originally Posted by DJprofessorK [View Original Post]

I've thought the same. It begs the question, who are these idiots who are handing over 100's of dollars for video chats? And how long do these things stick around on the site before they realize it's not going to fly? Also, don't get it twisted: the 18-25 demographic don't give two craps about social distancing. In fact, many metrics show that they're the ones spreading it the most because they don't take precautions, insist on seeing their friends at social gatherings and bars, and they're less likely to refrain from taking vacations where large gatherings are expected. I'm sure you have some outliers who care about their parents' health, but these people are definitely not the norm. Don't fall for it.

"It begs the question, who are these idiots who are handing over 100's of dollars for video chats?

The same ones who put deposits down for escorts to "get the room", etc.

Full disclosure. I've been "rinsed" in person -- a shopping trip as a meet and greet with a promise of fun at the end only for her to have to rush off because her "kid is sick at school".

PT Barnum was definitely right. "There's a sucker born every minute. " I know, because I've been the sucker. LOL.

As far as paying for video / pics, etc -- people used to pay monthly fees for internet porn, so there ya go.

**Pubb69** · 09-23-20 13:59

Originally Posted by VincentCor74 [View Original Post]

Is that, according to multiple statistics I saw online, about 4% (give or take a point) of the world's population has some form of autoimmune "disease" or classification. But, on Seeking right now, it's about 50%. Truly staggering, and so sad for the "hot girl between the ages of 18-25" demographic, that so many are suffering! .

The naivety of these girls to go on a site and state their profession or where they go to school and put their pictures on a site like S. A. Like that is a socially acceptable dating site.

**DJprofessorK** · 09-23-20 10:53

Originally Posted by VincentCor74 [View Original Post]

Is that, according to multiple statistics I saw online, about 4% (give or take a point) of the world's population has some form of autoimmune "disease" or classification. But, on Seeking right now, it's about 50%. Truly staggering, and so sad for the "hot girl between the ages of 18-25" demographic, that so many are suffering! .

I've thought the same. It begs the question, who are these idiots who are handing over 100's of dollars for video chats? And how long do these things stick around on the site before they realize it's not going to fly? Also, don't get it twisted: the 18-25 demographic don't give two craps about social distancing. In fact, many metrics show that they're the ones spreading it the most because they don't take precautions, insist on seeing their friends at social gatherings and bars, and they're less likely to refrain from taking vacations where large gatherings are expected. I'm sure you have some outliers who care about their parents' health, but these people are definitely not the norm. Don't fall for it.

**VincentCor74** · 09-23-20 10:01

Originally Posted by Ddmmaa [View Original Post]

To add on your list:

-Babygirl NC:

Platonic dates with $$$ as an allowance.

https://www.seeking.com/member/a7662...7-0d0445ea16c5

-Stefanie615.

Online only for now.

https://www.seeking.com/member/24d03...5-920d5f7dbcca

-strawberryseeds.

Online only for now.

https://www.seeking.com/member/31652...c-52e42f8e5982

-jada215.

Over the phone / online for now.

https://www.seeking.com/member/365b2...0-a848c498fd40

-JesMcPhattbutt.

Private cam session which means online only I think.

https://www.seeking.com/member/d70d2...0-5bbc88633c8f

-SweetAsSugarBabie.

Virtual fun.

https://www.seeking.com/member/13a75...4-05ea681bf0bb

Is that, according to multiple statistics I saw online, about 4% (give or take a point) of the world's population has some form of autoimmune "disease" or classification. But, on Seeking right now, it's about 50%. Truly staggering, and so sad for the "hot girl between the ages of 18-25" demographic, that so many are suffering! .

**Wheaton278** · 09-23-20 09:57

Originally Posted by LatinoHeat919 [View Original Post]

Sorry. This is her profile picture.

I talked with Lacey for a bit. She was quick to make plans for me to come to her place. She got very detail oriented like the amount was $$ and it was one and done and she would prefer to only spend 30 minutes together. Online she was fine, in text it became evident she's a pro and just running bodies through her front door. It's not what I was looking for so I passed.

**DJprofessorK** · 09-22-20 23:39

Originally Posted by SmallAsianCock [View Original Post]

Can someone explain this to me.

" Single mother looking for a mentor and a strictly platonic relationship. Definitely NSA. Currently can only host, can explain into further detail in a message ". My confusion comes from the fact that she is strictly Platonic. Then she gore in to say "Definitely NSA" and can host.

https://www.seeking.com/member/76c53...b-7742a994c1b7

House arrest, maybe? Or a very young child that's either too young for daycare or she can't afford it? The rest of her profile suggests that she's been in some trouble. That's my guess.