The Prickyard

[BigGuyUAteMe]

I sure missed out on some excitement, wish everyone was living the dream. Will I'm just don't wake me up.

Missing a lot of you, some not so much.

BG,

Play safe, have fun, give and get respect, do your research, find some crazy-good and TPHFB!

[Candace38G]

I never said LEO could use the review against you because I know they can't, but it could bring even more attention to yourself. If I continued working after getting the same charges as you I'd be telling every single client to not review me but that gentlemen's review could have very well been posted to directly benefit you for the sole reason of showing other members of this board that they have the green light to see you. Yes, Jan definitely didn't help your situation and very well had made it worse for you but I don't believe it was done purposely or maliciously. She's working for another agency and was let off with no charges. Yeah it looks bad but this is a livelihood for all of us and her life needs to go on just like yours. You were taking a much bigger risk by running an agency that several ladies were working for and unfortunately your the bigger catch for LEO and obviously who they wanted.

BgDoc and BigMack seem awfully similar. Maybe one and the same?

My original post on here and you can look back if needed. I didn't state names. I didn't start this bs. I stated my retirement and I stated all was well. So trust me I had intentions of moving forward. And still do.

As far as review. Only I know the exchange if any that day.

I'm not who LEO wants anymore. So the story on my part is over. A Misdemeanor will never trump a felony and when they place her they will wonder how she was connected. Not my issue anymore.

Even more so, I know 100 all my risks which is why my original post was classy and left at that. Until, someone started dropping names. And in this industry if you arent going to tell the truth and the whole story. Don't tell it at all. I'm not mad, angery or upset at anyone. But I be damned if I sit back and be made to look like a liar or that I had bad intentions. Because as previously posted below. Prior to this Jan spoke highly of me. Clearly, she was never in harms way. I wish her well.

[BgDoc3]

I never said LEO could use the review against you because I know they can't, but it could bring even more attention to yourself. If I continued working after getting the same charges as you I'd be telling every single client to not review me but that gentlemen's review could have very well been posted to directly benefit you for the sole reason of showing other members of this board that they have the green light to see you. Yes, Jan definitely didn't help your situation and very well had made it worse for you but I don't believe it was done purposely or maliciously. She's working for another agency and was let off with no charges. Yeah it looks bad but this is a livelihood for all of us and her life needs to go on just like yours. You were taking a much bigger risk by running an agency that several ladies were working for and unfortunately your the bigger catch for LEO and obviously who they wanted.

BgDoc and BigMack seem awfully similar. Maybe one and the same?

Most ladies in this were smarter than what Jan pulled. Guess not. Most intelligent ladies and men in this admit nothing and when turning on people and getting away with it are not that stupid to go out and join another group to see if they can get away with it again. It is one thing to snitch and get away with it it is quite another to go out and do it again. If she gets hit a second time I hope she likes the great indoors and an orange jump suit becomes her. Excuses excuses excuses my dear. Her life does have to go on but at whose expense down the road and if she turned once will she do it again if she gets caught? Time will tell. Maybe she can actually get a real job since she has serious issues with a serious lack of success in this one.

[VixenRed]

Oh here we go. Now all of a sudden. LEO is watching. But they aren't just watching this board. They are watching DI and they know exactly who to go see that will tell them exactly what they want kherri.

Besides can you control what is posted on the boards? No you can't. Neither can I. And reviews aren't enough to do shit because if that's the case these reviews on here would put everyone in jeopardy. Locations, names, acts are posted here daily.

Never had or cared about friends in this industry. You are entitled to your opinion just like anyone else. Funny part I came off as a pimp when nobody at the meet and greet worked for me. Reese had only been in Indy for 2 days as of the day of the meet and greet. Quite frankly. End of story.

I never said LEO could use the review against you because I know they can't, but it could bring even more attention to yourself. If I continued working after getting the same charges as you I'd be telling every single client to not review me but that gentlemen's review could have very well been posted to directly benefit you for the sole reason of showing other members of this board that they have the green light to see you. Yes, Jan definitely didn't help your situation and very well had made it worse for you but I don't believe it was done purposely or maliciously. She's working for another agency and was let off with no charges. Yeah it looks bad but this is a livelihood for all of us and her life needs to go on just like yours. You were taking a much bigger risk by running an agency that several ladies were working for and unfortunately your the bigger catch for LEO and obviously who they wanted.

BgDoc and BigMack seem awfully similar. Maybe one and the same?

[BgDoc3]

Feel so sorry for her that she was so traumatized she didn't know how to say she was just in the house with her friends. I read no where on the posts that it said they caught her doing anything but standing around with her friends. But you say she was so scared that she spilled the beans on her booker and the ring she was a part of and working for and even supposedly let them record her doing it and videoed her according to what has been posted. So upset the "man" let her walk without charges filed against her or so it has been said. So frightened over the incident that she is now working supposedly for another agency under a different name and taking clients who put both her names on the boards. Something about all that just doesn't make sense to me. But hey she is a mature woman who just got carried away, spilled the beans on her booker and walked scot free to go out and do it all again and you and others feel sorry for her? Really? No seriously Really?

[FrazzleSnazzle]

No one comes off very well in the recent unpleasantness.

Except perhaps Reese and Tiger, who seem to have the good sense to have disappeared from public view. Being released without charges doesn't mean your not on LEO's radar, and jumping right back
into the game, whether on your own or with an even better known management group, may not be the wisest move. Nobody likes to be taunted, in sports, business, relationships, life, and it is conceivable that LEO could view such moves as taunting, and in any context the taunter generally makes themselves a target. Cracking under stress under the circumstances is understandable (and the backstory in this specific case is indeed rather sad, perhaps desperate) but again leaping back into the fray within a few days with ample promotion in a revolving door atmosphere, or even on a lower key,less publicized basis, may not be the height of enlightened self interest (even if guided by a Rasputin-ironically one that the subject expressed distaste for not so long ago). A respite, from work or commentary, would seem to be the better course of valor right now from those directly involved. As well as for those of us on the client side who may feel vaguely like an enabler, even if we're not exactly sure of what.

[Candace38G]

Like I said in my last post and I'll say it again since it went in one ear and out the other. Maybe I need to be more aggressive in my posting. If I had an active investigation going on for something directly related to the hobby that includes serious charges I'd be keeping my butt off here and certainly wouldn't appreciate having reviews being posted. I may be a crazy redhead but wouldn't a review that a gentlemen posts about an encounter that happened AFTER said provider received serious charges and under investigation for something directly related to the hobby be a little idiotic to do? You might as well call the investigators and tell them you're still working and continuing to break the law? LEO knows what your handle is on here, they know your name, they have charged you and your out on bail but you're throwing yourself to the wolves because your handle is everywhere on this page right now. Then again you're keeping LEO's attention on yourself and off the rest of us so we can go back to our regularly scheduled programming. I honestly don't wish what you're going through on anyone and it's very unfortunate. That being said I must say that when I started in the hobby I stayed at a house where there was 4-5 working ladies and the owner of the house was also a provider and running the show. When I think back on that time and wonder what I would've done if there was a raid there's a very good chance I would've done the same that Jan did. I certainly wouldn't have done it to save my ass or snitch on anyone. It'll be because I'm nervous as hell, never been in that situation before, and even if you're taught what to do in that situation doesn't mean it won't go right out the window. It's very stressful! I honestly don't think she said anything on purpose and that's the risk someone makes when they decide to take on several ladies and their "agency" grows way to fast. I did get a bad taste in my mouth at the meet and greet and Sara isn't the only one that was thinking it. It may have been the alcohol but you really did come off aggressive and very much like a pimp running ladies. I know Sara and myself weren't the only ones that noticed it and it was to the point that some of us felt bad for the ladies working for your agency. Also, I didn't appreciate you calling me the B word but then again it may have been the alcohol or just how you are..

Oh here we go. Now all of a sudden. LEO is watching. But they aren't just watching this board. They are watching DI and they know exactly who to go see that will tell them exactly what they want kherri.

Besides can you control what is posted on the boards? No you can't. Neither can I. And reviews aren't enough to do shit because if that's the case these reviews on here would put everyone in jeopardy. Locations, names, acts are posted here daily.

Never had or cared about friends in this industry. You are entitled to your opinion just like anyone else. Funny part I came off as a pimp when nobody at the meet and greet worked for me. Reese had only been in Indy for 2 days as of the day of the meet and greet. Quite frankly. End of story.

[VixenRed]

Like I said in my last post and I'll say it again since it went in one ear and out the other. Maybe I need to be more aggressive in my posting. If I had an active investigation going on for something directly related to the hobby that includes serious charges I'd be keeping my butt off here and certainly wouldn't appreciate having reviews being posted. I may be a crazy redhead but wouldn't a review that a gentlemen posts about an encounter that happened AFTER said provider received serious charges and under investigation for something directly related to the hobby be a little idiotic to do? You might as well call the investigators and tell them you're still working and continuing to break the law? LEO knows what your handle is on here, they know your name, they have charged you and your out on bail but you're throwing yourself to the wolves because your handle is everywhere on this page right now. Then again you're keeping LEO's attention on yourself and off the rest of us so we can go back to our regularly scheduled programming. I honestly don't wish what you're going through on anyone and it's very unfortunate. That being said I must say that when I started in the hobby I stayed at a house where there was 4-5 working ladies and the owner of the house was also a provider and running the show. When I think back on that time and wonder what I would've done if there was a raid there's a very good chance I would've done the same that Jan did. I certainly wouldn't have done it to save my ass or snitch on anyone. It'll be because I'm nervous as hell, never been in that situation before, and even if you're taught what to do in that situation doesn't mean it won't go right out the window. It's very stressful! I honestly don't think she said anything on purpose and that's the risk someone makes when they decide to take on several ladies and their "agency" grows way to fast. I did get a bad taste in my mouth at the meet and greet and Sara isn't the only one that was thinking it. It may have been the alcohol but you really did come off aggressive and very much like a pimp running ladies. I know Sara and myself weren't the only ones that noticed it and it was to the point that some of us felt bad for the ladies working for your agency. Also, I didn't appreciate you calling me the B word but then again it may have been the alcohol or just how you are.

I truly feel bad for Jan because she was very new to the hobby and went through something traumatizing. I hope she has great success in this hobby. I think it's wise for C38 to retire until legal issues blow over and if I remember right that's what she announced. I hope all the wonderful hobbiests can continue getting their rocks off by sexy ladies without being nervous as hell and hope my fellow hobby sisters stay safe and have an enjoyable experience in this business.

[IndyAnon]

And I am sure you would feel the same about Jan also since you said "Mistakes happen to everyone". Am I not correct?

Are you suggesting she flipped and it was a mistake?

I really haven't been reading these post but I do think there's a lot to be said for someone that admits to their mistake.

[Candace38G]

And I am sure you would feel the same about Jan also since you said "Mistakes happen to everyone". Am I not correct?

Mistakes and snitching are not even close to the same thing.

[Candace38G]

Thanks for explaining what happened and sending out the affidavit to let people judge for themselves.

I'm glad you're not letting people give you shit and don't feel bad. Mistakes happen to everyone.

Thank you. At least I can own up to my mistakes.

[Candace38G]

I was asked by a friend to stop and let this subject go away. Then I learned that a screenshot of the Probable Cause Affidavit is being submitted via texts and e-mails to multiple hobbyist's on the board as well as other Ex-AMB clients. I find this ludicrous, insensitive and what I consider against all hobby etiquette. So I am making one last comment on the subject then I am done.

The Probable Cause Affidavit screenshot being passed around is missing the main part, the signature line where the detective responsible for the case signs it! Why is the signature line missing? The top of the screen shot is where it's indicated that the interviewee was given a pre-printed advice of rights, asked to initial 1 through 5 and sign the bottom. All five ladies were given the same document and to the best of my knowledge all five signed it. To the best of my knowledge nothing else was signed by Jan. If a confession was made, a testimony by a witness or a statement by a witness, the interviewee would sign it. Nothing like this exists.

Nobody but Jan and Uncle were in the room so nobody but them knows what was said this includes all the other four ladies..

His signature is on there. Trust me. But I showed what needed to be disclosed except personal information. To show proof that Jan / Kherri is who rolled.

I'm not going to sit here and knit pick at the fact that the detectives signature wasnt in the screen shot. Of course it wasnt. Neither was my address. Because why I ONLY showed what is in question. I have the entire 10 pages in my possesion. With ONLY MY NAME AND JANS on it.

Why do I have to lie? Its somewhat funny that anyone thinks I would have to lie out of all people involved. Comical.

[Candace38G]

Now let's get real. BM and Candace are hell bent on trying to smear Jan. Candace is sending the affidavit to clients AND now someone with a database of telephone numbers is texting clients and leaving voicemails telling them that they are being watched and effectively scaring the crap out of them. Now let's look at who failed who.

In the movie Wall Street, Michael Douglas's character Gordon Geeko stated "The point is, ladies and gentleman, that greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right, greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures the essence of the evolutionary spirit. ".

And his greed led him to be sloppy. So who failed who? When a provider employs an agency, just like an entertainer, they pay a fee for services they expect the agency to provide. In the providing business, the agency will advertise, field inquiries and vet clients. Pay attention here: the provider EMPLOYS the agency, unlike a pimp:

"who controls prostitutes and arranges clients for them, taking part of their earnings in return". Although it sounds similar, it's not the same. AMB advertised for ladies to work for her. See the difference?

Now who failed who:

Someone, presumably Candace, is putting clients at risk by sending unsolicited texts to a client list and / or leaving voicemails. How is this discreet? Is this exposing them to family and / or employers?

Per discussion Jan supposedly attended an orientation at the house prior to the bust. Apparently someone failed to emphasize exercising our fifth amendment rights and the mantra "I want a lawyer" should a situation arise that would dictate the need.

When other agencies or independents screen effectively this situation would have been avoided. Taking the word or reference of providers is risky. The reference is only as good as your trust in the person giving it. How much trust did Candace put in Milfy and the unidentified CMT? Apparently too much. Her screening stopped and now all providers working in that house were exposed to potential legal issues. What if instead of the law, the bad guy had been abusive? Huh, huh, huh? So who failed who?

Me. Release numbers of clients. Lmao. Thats a complete joke and you just make yourself look like an ass. 10 years I have in the hobby. Never once have I ever even as much as texted my clients without permission to do so. I haven't given them shit and no plans to do so. I don't cut my nose off despite my face.

Screening. You were there right? In 10 years I have screened the same way. Everytime and it has been effective. I used 3 platforms and 2 provider references and LEO had to cancel 3 times while the screening process happend. So again, opening your mouth all the way from Fargo but telling BM to mind his business. Pretty Idiotic of you if I do say so myself.

Speaking of screening, I admitted my faults. However, I would have only one charge if Jan / Kherri followed advice given. And it was given and discussed prior so you are also wrong about that. But you would know because you were here right?

So all the girls who have been busted before like DI girls or other agencies they all got felony charges too? No. They don't. Because nobody snitched.

I'm glad everyone seems to know how I did things and not one of you were there. Is it possible you are in defense of FF who is currently getting his dick wet by Kherri / Jan?

Is that what all this is really about?

Better yet, why I would I pick Jan / Kherri to be the one who snitched. There were 3 others I could have choose. Why didn't I "pick" them if I'm lying.

At the end of the day.

I haven't lost my loyalty to this hobby or my clients however, some of you have by covering up the truth to save a piece of ass. Risking clients and providers in this hobby for the sake of a women who clearly rolled per the affidavit. One can't make up an entire affidavit with a case number and leos signature.

I can sleep well at night knowing. I am taking the heat because that's what real providers do in this hobby.

3 things matter:

The affidavit.

The truth.

And the loyalty.

Its about what is proven. And as seen, per affidavit it has been proven.

[Candace38G]

I was asked by a friend to stop and let this subject go away. Then I learned that a screenshot of the Probable Cause Affidavit is being submitted via texts and e-mails to multiple hobbyist's on the board as well as other Ex-AMB clients. I find this ludicrous, insensitive and what I consider against all hobby etiquette. So I am making one last comment on the subject then I am done.

The Probable Cause Affidavit screenshot being passed around is missing the main part, the signature line where the detective responsible for the case signs it! Why is the signature line missing? The top of the screen shot is where it's indicated that the interviewee was given a pre-printed advice of rights, asked to initial 1 through 5 and sign the bottom. All five ladies were given the same document and to the best of my knowledge all five signed it. To the best of my knowledge nothing else was signed by Jan. If a confession was made, a testimony by a witness or a statement by a witness, the interviewee would sign it. Nothing like this exists.

Nobody but Jan and Uncle were in the room so nobody but them knows what was said this includes all the other four ladies. LE lies, manipulates, threatens and does whatever is necessary to get an interviewee confused and to say things they don't want to. Is it possible Jan said things she shouldn't have, absolutely? Did she cry out "I will tell you whatever you want and sign anything you want to get out of this!" Nope I truly don't believe she did, that's a NARC..

Might want to check your laws. Affidavits are written statements from detectives based off information given by parties involved (who talked) . And they have to sign them and submit them to court. JAN / Kherri signed her Miranda rights as we all did. That is a requirement showing that Miranda rights were given. No personal information was leaked. And if LEO is watching they already have the information I have discussed on the board. I have it in my possession and I was there. So I know what happened.

[AaaGabriel812]

The only three things that are important are the name on the affidavit signed by the snitch at the office of LE... Make sense to you AAA? However the one who rolled would be detained to roll over and sign a statement identifying who did what.... But then my name is not on the police document signed by the lady who dictated it to Uncle. Have a good week Ms / Mr. Gabriel. If it goes to trial it will become public record.

I was asked by a friend to stop and let this subject go away. Then I learned that a screenshot of the Probable Cause Affidavit is being submitted via texts and e-mails to multiple hobbyist's on the board as well as other Ex-AMB clients. I find this ludicrous, insensitive and what I consider against all hobby etiquette. So I am making one last comment on the subject then I am done.

The Probable Cause Affidavit screenshot being passed around is missing the main part, the signature line where the detective responsible for the case signs it! Why is the signature line missing? The top of the screen shot is where it's indicated that the interviewee was given a pre-printed advice of rights, asked to initial 1 through 5 and sign the bottom. All five ladies were given the same document and to the best of my knowledge all five signed it. To the best of my knowledge nothing else was signed by Jan. If a confession was made, a testimony by a witness or a statement by a witness, the interviewee would sign it. Nothing like this exists.

Nobody but Jan and Uncle were in the room so nobody but them knows what was said this includes all the other four ladies. LE lies, manipulates, threatens and does whatever is necessary to get an interviewee confused and to say things they don't want to. Is it possible Jan said things she shouldn't have, absolutely? Did she cry out "I will tell you whatever you want and sign anything you want to get out of this!" Nope I truly don't believe she did, that's a NARC. Uncle can combine statements, comments, information from multiple interviews into a Probable Cause Affidavit. I was told by another interviewee that was in the room next to Jan that no one entered either room other than Uncle, no prosecutor entered either room, thus no deal for Immunity could have been made.

38 C I feel for you and wish this never happened to you and wish you well. I also thought you said you retired? You should because LE is watching you, making screen prints of all these posts and laughing along with the prosecutor who will be involved in your plea bargain. Just ask EarlyCuyler. It's sad that all of this was brought to the board by BM because, all he has done is endanger your future.

BM maybe you should retire because none of the "Quality Ladies", your words not mine, in Indy will see you. However you might want to try the SW scene because most of those ladies are good at sticking small tubes into small holes.