The Prickyard

[IndyGolfer60]

Wondering that myself. Awhile back he and I were in the middle of a conversation and one day he just stopped responding. Haven't heard a word about him since.

Me too, he vouched for me a couple of times.

[RonBurgIndy]

He was a big contributor to the forum. He can't stay away forever, right? I'm thinking he's taking vacation on an island of boobies and asses.

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?

Be Safe, g.

[Chelli4me]

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?Be Safe, g.

Wondering that myself. Awhile back he and I were in the middle of a conversation and one day he just stopped responding. Haven't heard a word about him since.

[Garmila]

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?

Be Safe, g.

[Admin2]

The bullshitters usually don't last.

10,000 fucking times.

[Jjbee62]

Your review is about this guy, who gives a fuck? If you went to the place then review the chick you fucked. Then guys read yours, they read his, they read others and they make up their minds.

Seriously why are you even wasting your time looking at time stamps in order to write this post? You guys complicate something so fucking simple.

• Read about pussy

• Fuck pussy

• Write about pussy

How much fucking easier than that could it possibly be?

A2

How much easier? Skip step 1 and 3.

There are always going to be bullshit reviews and bullshit reviewers. If a review doesn't match your experience, post your experience. It doesn't take long for everyone to figure out whose posts are accurate. The bullshitters usually don't last.

[Bob0324]

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

That's why there is a fight thread. If you can see it's a fake report so can everybody else. The problem is it never stops with one, 5 guys call it out. Then guys want to be the first to call it out so they start shooting first and figuring it out later.

Use the fight thread.

A2

Maybe Scott has dementia or is on benzos or something, if you read his post he's either very fake or very confused.

[Admin2]

I'm not calling out fake reviews or anything along those lines, however, LonelyInBTown does make a point. I've been to Banner as recently as late September and Jenny is no longer there. The description of Jenny is correct but I didn't have the same experience, although I was very new to the hobby at that time so that may have contributed. The girl that is currently there goes by Cindy unless she uses multiple names or there is indeed a new girl there named Amy. I doubt a new girl is there as that would mean Cindy left after only a month or so, but again I could be wrong.

Also, when you look at the reviewer's posting content and date / timestamps you see where LonelyInBTown may be correct. There is a pattern to all posts regarding sentence structure, description, and word usage. Reviews from this individual lack a lot of qualities you see in other posts--they have the appearance of being crafted in a specific way.

As far as whether or not this is a good thing to allow, I think the real question is--how can it be prevented? Some sort of analysis algorithm for writing would be required (or someone pouring over all these posts looking for specific patterns). Can't really say how feasible that is. Not my wheelhouse.

Your review is about this guy, who gives a fuck? If you went to the place then review the chick you fucked. Then guys read yours, they read his, they read others and they make up their minds.

Seriously why are you even wasting your time looking at time stamps in order to write this post? You guys complicate something so fucking simple.

• Read about pussy

• Fuck pussy

• Write about pussy

How much fucking easier than that could it possibly be?

A2

[Strych9999]

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

I'm not calling out fake reviews or anything along those lines, however, LonelyInBTown does make a point. I've been to Banner as recently as late September and Jenny is no longer there. The description of Jenny is correct but I didn't have the same experience, although I was very new to the hobby at that time so that may have contributed. The girl that is currently there goes by Cindy unless she uses multiple names or there is indeed a new girl there named Amy. I doubt a new girl is there as that would mean Cindy left after only a month or so, but again I could be wrong.

Also, when you look at the reviewer's posting content and date / timestamps you see where LonelyInBTown may be correct. There is a pattern to all posts regarding sentence structure, description, and word usage. Reviews from this individual lack a lot of qualities you see in other posts--they have the appearance of being crafted in a specific way.

As far as whether or not this is a good thing to allow, I think the real question is--how can it be prevented? Some sort of analysis algorithm for writing would be required (or someone pouring over all these posts looking for specific patterns). Can't really say how feasible that is. Not my wheelhouse.

[Jeast72]

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

That's why there is a fight thread. If you can see it's a fake report so can everybody else. The problem is it never stops with one, 5 guys call it out. Then guys want to be the first to call it out so they start shooting first and figuring it out later.

Use the fight thread.

A2

That is what the fight thread is for. I mistakenly thought it would be less controversial to indirectly call it out but had to put it near the offending post so people could figure out who I was talking about. That was before I even noticed the "general reports" connection and posted there also. I shouldn't have worried about pointing fingers directly and just taken it all, with quotes, to the "prickyard". The same people willing to dig to see who I was talking about would have still seen it there also.

I'm no less irked than anyone else when a report thread gets swamped with back and forth posts between arguing mongers. Not wanting to be the cause of it myself.

[Keepinitclean]

I can't see why people feel the need to post false reviews, embellished info, or otherwise twisted accounts. Especially when their past posts contradict the latest. What is the benifit?

Because it's the internet and they can? I can't see why people feel the need to start up shit like this on review threads when you have a fight thread.

A2

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

That's why there is a fight thread. If you can see it's a fake report so can everybody else. The problem is it never stops with one, 5 guys call it out. Then guys want to be the first to call it out so they start shooting first and figuring it out later.

Use the fight thread.

A2

[Jeast72]

I can't see why people feel the need to post false reviews, embellished info, or otherwise twisted accounts. Especially when their past posts contradict the latest. What is the benifit?

Because it's the internet and they can? I can't see why people feel the need to start up shit like this on review threads when you have a fight thread.

A2

[Jjbee62]

This is the place for all your rants.

About the current rant, sorry. Communication is almost always going to be a problem. Look at it from the other side.

If a girl doesn't respond, or won't verify you, she loses out on a customer. If she accepts a date with the wrong person, she goes to jail. She might even end up dead. Then there's the guys who show up and want to haggle, or want extras for free.

There are always girls who don't care about verification, who will see anyone. Some are thieves, some are drug addicts and many aren't worth the money.

It occurs to me that maybe the slow communication is another verification tool. The guy leaving 10 voice or text messages, or ranting on the forum might not be someone they want to see.

[EarlyCuyler]

My original post on here and you can look back if needed. I didn't state names. I didn't start this bs. I stated my retirement and I stated all was well. So trust me I had intentions of moving forward. And still do.

As far as review. Only I know the exchange if any that day.

I'm not who LEO wants anymore. So the story on my part is over. A Misdemeanor will never trump a felony and when they place her they will wonder how she was connected. Not my issue anymore.

Even more so, I know 100 all my risks which is why my original post was classy and left at that. Until, someone started dropping names. And in this industry if you arent going to tell the truth and the whole story. Don't tell it at all. I'm not mad, angery or upset at anyone. But I be damned if I sit back and be made to look like a liar or that I had bad intentions. Because as previously posted below. Prior to this Jan spoke highly of me. Clearly, she was never in harms way. I wish her well.

Your screening put Jan on the other side of the table, a table that she had never sat at before and was scared as phuck to be seated at. She's not a hardened pro like you and me. The day I was busted, 2 of the 8 arrested sung like canaries. Was I happy about it? No. Did I understand it? Yes. In a perfect world, no one phucks up. However, it's not a perfect world and your phuck up started the ball rolling and placed her in a damned if you do, damned if you dont situation. Also, dont you think she might have had just a teeny tiny bit of animosity towars you as she sat there being interrogated? I think it's pretty entitled of you to point fingers at someone that you put at great risk. Again, we all make mistakes, myself included, but I certainly don't think you have any accumulated capital in the "how to be a perfect hooker " account. Not sure where you are living now, but I know that 100 percent of the building materials are glass, so put down that rock.

I may be way wrong here, but my knowledge of what constitutes a promoting prostitution case is simply that one person is setting appointments for another. In times past, when the wall of shame was online, there were dozens and dozens of people that were hit with that charge, and I promise that they weren't all rolled on. A three way appointment is promoting. A pimp in a shitty motel is promoting. And we all know that in the latter case, no one rolls. Ever. They could have gotten you once you set an appointment for another person. My guess is that they wanted to build a case and have more evidence to go to court with. That's always the modus operandi.

You mentioned in another post that similar agencies have had their ladies arrested, but the ladies didn't sing, and that's why the agency didn't get hurt. That's not true. Ladies have sung like canaries at times, but other agencies have other measures in place to protect protect themselves. So I wanted to clear that up.

Questions.

Why in the hell are you on here? You came on to say goodbye, which I think is foolish, but then you come back over and over to try to clear your name and muddy someone else's. And again, you caused this situation. When you take responsibility and then use the word "but" as a conjunction, you cancel out whatever was said before the "but". You're playing with fire to come here and put your own legal future at risk in order to exact some sort of vengeance. That's at the very best foolish, trust me. The prosecutor will have a print out of every post you've made, which might not help your case when you claim to be done with this little underbelly subculture. If your attorney is giving you the go ahead to continue here, you might want to consider one of OJs lawyers instead at this point.

Why are you reaching out to people you've never met and saying that you've been told hat they are trustworthy? You're making people very very nervous by doing that. I have no doubt that this post will piss you off. That simply can't be avoided I'm afraid. I would never have said anything about any of these issues publicly if you had kept a low profile. I would have respected that.

You really need to just step away from being a keyboard warrior where the hobby is concerned, for many reasons.

"Discretion is the better part of valor". Melania Trump

[Sarag]

Maybe look for a reputable provider with good reviews?

In the eight years I've been mongering around Indy, I've been hit / robbed once, robbed once, cash and dash three times. One cash-and-dash was in Pickwick Farms on the NW side off Ditch Road.

The other four incidents were on the east side, 46th down to Washington Street, Shadeland to Mitthoffer.

Avoid that area alltogether!

That's an awful lot of bad situations you've encountered.