Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
Ava Escorts
Sex Vacation
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
The Velvet Rooms
Best Escorts

Thread: Arrangement Reports

+ Add Report
Page 724 of 999 FirstFirst ... 224 624 674 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 774 824 ... LastLast
Results 10,846 to 10,860 of 14983
This blog is moderated by Member #5121
  1. #4138
    Quote Originally Posted by Twiggy2076  [View Original Post]
    Back when I did have an account, I got banned about halfway through the membership thanks to a girl getting overzealous with her messaging in platform and me still learning the dos and donts.

    Long story short, I disputed with my card company. I emailed SA's customer team and I asked 3 times for the actual reason I was banned. When one was not given, I opened the dispute with CC company, said "signed up for a dating service, account was canceled and closed without refund and without reason. " Provided the email of SA saying they will not discuss or give a reason why I was banned, and literally the next day I had the whole payment refunded on my card.

    Even without "evidence", be smart about your wording and it'll work out.
    Even if your wife (thanks god I don't have one) saw the cc statement and she call and said it was an unauthorized transaction, will get your money back, why? When bank do charge back, they debit SA account the amount to refund you and charge back fees like 40-50 extra for them, So SA is losing 90 plus 50 charge back fee (that is why online business hate charge back and bank don't care because they get the charge back fee from the merchant.) the more charge back, the more bank make. I laugh when sa said we will keep your money, Not really.

  2. #4137

    Proper Wording

    Quote Originally Posted by Pal5600  [View Original Post]
    Not really man, the bank will decide if you get your money back or not, a simply dispute like "I paid for online services that I didn't get, will be 100& charge back to you, without your signature, is 100% charged back). Sa think they can hold your money, but the bank is the boss here, as they usully are. There are banking rules for online cc transaction, a simple dispute will get your money back.
    Back when I did have an account, I got banned about halfway through the membership thanks to a girl getting overzealous with her messaging in platform and me still learning the dos and donts.

    Long story short, I disputed with my card company. I emailed SA's customer team and I asked 3 times for the actual reason I was banned. When one was not given, I opened the dispute with CC company, said "signed up for a dating service, account was canceled and closed without refund and without reason. " Provided the email of SA saying they will not discuss or give a reason why I was banned, and literally the next day I had the whole payment refunded on my card.

    Even without "evidence", be smart about your wording and it'll work out.

  3. #4136
    Quote Originally Posted by PauFord  [View Original Post]
    Post here is cool but definitely agree that we should be reporting these girls on SA every time we come across them. I've been reporting a lot of scammers, pic / vid and snap premium sellers, virtual only girls, etc. And SA seems good about getting rid of them from the site.
    You really don't need to do anything, give it a week or so, the profile will be gone, they just hop from one city to another, if you report them, they just do a new profile, is don't stop them from created new profile, just to be aware if sometime is too good to be true, it probably is. Beside the pic of the two girls in string bikini is good for my jerking off wet dream at nigh, t hahaha.

  4. #4135
    Yes, 2 accounts solved that problem. Having a burner / 2nd profile is helpful for a number of reasons.

    Quote Originally Posted by LoveSmallPerky  [View Original Post]
    It is hard to tell what they do because when you report someone for any reason it will automatically permanently block them from you. You would need another account or a friend to check the profile to see if it is still active. I do know that if they do the online / pic / video deal they get suspended until they change their profile and agree that repeating it will get them banned. They actually send a message out saying that those things violate the spirit of the site which is to meet in person.

  5. #4134

    2 accounts?

    Quote Originally Posted by PauFord  [View Original Post]
    Post here is cool but definitely agree that we should be reporting these girls on SA every time we come across them. I've been reporting a lot of scammers, pic / vid and snap premium sellers, virtual only girls, etc. And SA seems good about getting rid of them from the site.
    It is hard to tell what they do because when you report someone for any reason it will automatically permanently block them from you. You would need another account or a friend to check the profile to see if it is still active. I do know that if they do the online / pic / video deal they get suspended until they change their profile and agree that repeating it will get them banned. They actually send a message out saying that those things violate the spirit of the site which is to meet in person.

  6. #4133

  7. #4132

    Please let us know

    Quote Originally Posted by Pal5600  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/0eff8...b-42e8301f8433

    Working on this one, getting close, average face but that 19 years old body is banging, she said she got hundreds hundreds of messages a day, probably most from you guys offer her 50 plus Mcdonald gift card for her bare pussy, will see if this fat old ugly and short asian guy score or not, I need to use my ancient Chinese secret on her, probably 40% chance.
    The face is ok yea she's not a model, however she really looks 19 and has that body! I would stand in line for her as well.

  8. #4131
    Quote Originally Posted by GogoBananas  [View Original Post]
    Pal,

    Instead of posting here, why don't you do the SA community a favor and report her? It only takes 30 seconds.
    Post here is cool but definitely agree that we should be reporting these girls on SA every time we come across them. I've been reporting a lot of scammers, pic / vid and snap premium sellers, virtual only girls, etc. And SA seems good about getting rid of them from the site.

  9. #4130

    Report Her

    Quote Originally Posted by Pal5600  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/898a2...e-4e582e892cf6

    She or he actually message me back, still waiting for that "100 advance before to prove I am real, or need advance gas money, ect) are you guys getting the same scam.
    Pal,

    Instead of posting here, why don't you do the SA community a favor and report her? It only takes 30 seconds.

  10. #4129

    Scammer

    https://www.seeking.com/member/898a2...e-4e582e892cf6

    She or he actually message me back, still waiting for that "100 advance before to prove I am real, or need advance gas money, ect) are you guys getting the same scam.

  11. #4128
    Quote Originally Posted by WilSpanz  [View Original Post]
    Any details?

  12. #4127
    Quote Originally Posted by WilSpanz  [View Original Post]
    What was your experience?
    She was two hours away, she was going to drive to me, but she change her mind, kinda far drive tho, so move on to the next one.

  13. #4126
    Quote Originally Posted by Pal5600  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seeking.com/member/898a2...e-4e582e892cf6

    Man, wish this shit is real, at least the scammers have good taste, only in my wet dream guys, 99.99999% not real.
    We have the same taste, Pal5xx0. Must be an Asian thing LOL.

  14. #4125

  15. #4124

    Was it a good time?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pal5600  [View Original Post]
    Agoodtimmee.
    What was your experience?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
click for FREE hookups




click for FREE hookups

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape