|
This blog is moderated by Member #5121
-
Senior Member
Posts: 202
Dallasbaby
Originally Posted by Rileym
[View Original Post]
https://www.seeking.com/member/9ffdb...6-268ae3f5ef2e
Can't decide if this one is a scam or not. Bolt on's look fun of course, definitely looks older than 26. Reached out 3 days ago with no response. Last night out of the blue she replies back sending very explicit messages back, talking about her throbbing pussy and needing to cum, and wanting to see me right then at her hotel. Gave her the cell to text in private but she didn't go for it. Apparently staying at a downtown hotel. No talk of allowance on the site.
Anyone have any recent experiences with this one?? Seems to be some red flags. Obviously a pro but scammer as well?
Like I said a few days ago she quoted me $1,100.00 per month allowance and would not entertain a PPM price. This was a few months ago, so maybe things have changed.
But I did not pursue at those prices.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 54
Southern Sith
Talked to her at the beginning of December, she told me how she married into a bad situation, and needed to get out ASAP, I told her a figure for PPM, and then she sent me a screenshot of the SA TOS that mentions no PPM. She then said she wasn't looking for PPM, or a monthly, she needed 1800 to move and that was it. I told her best of luck, and that was the end of that.
Originally Posted by ADAvet101
[View Original Post]
Anyone got anything on this one?
https://www.seeking.com/member/46d8f...9-f0d07dda1ac1
Her profile if it's to be believed is amazing, but she does have that FinDom attribute in there and she apparently doesn't care that she is called one. And she comes complete with her own sob story. So does anyone have any experience with this one that can sway me one way or the other?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 162
Red Flags
Originally Posted by ADAvet101
[View Original Post]
Anyone got anything on this one?
https://www.seeking.com/member/46d8f...9-f0d07dda1ac1
Her profile if it's to be believed is amazing, but she does have that FinDom attribute in there and she apparently doesn't care that she is called one. And she comes complete with her own sob story. So does anyone have any experience with this one that can sway me one way or the other?
For me, there are too many red flags to waste my time. Findom? Fick that. Do you want to give your money away for nothing? Two kids? Usually means baby damage which is not for me at all. And if every pic is with snapchat filters? No thanks. There are tons of SBs on the site. Why would you waste your time with this?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 754
Someone for everyone
Here's one of the more bizarre profiles I've read in a while: https://www.seeking.com/member/7b973...2-de06b957772c.
I guess all she needs is one person who fits her requirements.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 116
SouthernSith
Anyone got anything on this one?
https://www.seeking.com/member/46d8f...9-f0d07dda1ac1
Her profile if it's to be believed is amazing, but she does have that FinDom attribute in there and she apparently doesn't care that she is called one. And she comes complete with her own sob story. So does anyone have any experience with this one that can sway me one way or the other?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 29
Originally Posted by Truthfu11
[View Original Post]
You have to be an active, paid member to see profiles listed on here. If you are logged out you must log back in. Also, many profiles are deactivated either because the SB deleted their profile, suspended their account or were kicked off SA for doing something against SA rules.
I can see the profiles just fine and I don't have a paid membership.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 788
Well put
Originally Posted by JHobby
[View Original Post]
This is discussed endlessly over at SLF reddit but the consensus among SDs at least is that ppm only when intimacy starts. Some would go on an initial platonic m&g then give travel cost gifts at the least, and if they feel good about the girl, give a fraction of the usual ppm as a GIFT. And I must reiterate this, do not ever agree on paying a ppm to a girl for an initial platonic m&g because 1) that reinforces rinsing behavior and 2) you give a signal to the girl that you're willing to be put in a disadvantageous position. Remember that this is a transaction no matter how much others insist that it's like a vanilla relationship or girls that argue they're not escorts and therefore should be paid for dates. These girls ARE sex workers and both of you are engaged in a transaction.
You have to understand that SA is filled with professional rinsers / scammers who would try their best to get sugar from you with no sugar in return. So do not encourage rinsing behaviors, there are already enough youtuber professional scammers teaching that bullshit, you don't have to play into their scheme too. The more men who adhere to this principle the leas likely will these scammers thrive in SA and their numbers will drop. You have to remember too that SBs greatly outnumber SDs, so we dictate the demand. With that in mind remember that how another SD pays affects the rest of those in the market. So you start paying for platonic dates then these girls start expecting it from the next SD. Don't be that guy.
Thanks, man. Very well put. I'm in total agreement with you. A non sexual date should follow normal dating rules, yes, I'll pay for dinner, theater tickets, admission, drinks, but no allowance over that. They are being treated to something they couldn; t afford on their own.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 788
Must belong
Originally Posted by SeanKonnery
[View Original Post]
Hey Guys, what am I missing here? Evertime I post the SA link in my browser it makes me login again or worse it says this user does not longer exist? Can anyone help? I have an account and still all links don't work?
You have to be an active, paid member to see profiles listed on here. If you are logged out you must log back in. Also, many profiles are deactivated either because the SB deleted their profile, suspended their account or were kicked off SA for doing something against SA rules.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 108
SA Links
Hey Guys, what am I missing here? Evertime I post the SA link in my browser it makes me login again or worse it says this user does not longer exist? Can anyone help? I have an account and still all links don't work?
-
Senior Member
Posts: 1323
Originally Posted by Rileym
[View Original Post]
https://www.seeking.com/member/9ffdb...6-268ae3f5ef2e
Can't decide if this one is a scam or not. Bolt on's look fun of course, definitely looks older than 26. Reached out 3 days ago with no response. Last night out of the blue she replies back sending very explicit messages back, talking about her throbbing pussy and needing to cum, and wanting to see me right then at her hotel. Gave her the cell to text in private but she didn't go for it. Apparently staying at a downtown hotel. No talk of allowance on the site.
Anyone have any recent experiences with this one?? Seems to be some red flags. Obviously a pro but scammer as well?
She's been on there since 2015, very unlikely to be a scammer. Probably a pro.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 337
I'm still surprised how many can't notice that Tranny look. Oh well, guess experience counts.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 115
You got to have principles
Originally Posted by Truthfu11
[View Original Post]
Ok, let's hear the consensus. Do you ppm when the meeting is just an afternoon out? Or only compensate for times where there is something sexual going on? I have not been paying but am wondering what the norm is.
This is discussed endlessly over at SLF reddit but the consensus among SDs at least is that ppm only when intimacy starts. Some would go on an initial platonic m&g then give travel cost gifts at the least, and if they feel good about the girl, give a fraction of the usual ppm as a GIFT. And I must reiterate this, do not ever agree on paying a ppm to a girl for an initial platonic m&g because 1) that reinforces rinsing behavior and 2) you give a signal to the girl that you're willing to be put in a disadvantageous position. Remember that this is a transaction no matter how much others insist that it's like a vanilla relationship or girls that argue they're not escorts and therefore should be paid for dates. These girls ARE sex workers and both of you are engaged in a transaction.
You have to understand that SA is filled with professional rinsers / scammers who would try their best to get sugar from you with no sugar in return. So do not encourage rinsing behaviors, there are already enough youtuber professional scammers teaching that bullshit, you don't have to play into their scheme too. The more men who adhere to this principle the leas likely will these scammers thrive in SA and their numbers will drop. You have to remember too that SBs greatly outnumber SDs, so we dictate the demand. With that in mind remember that how another SD pays affects the rest of those in the market. So you start paying for platonic dates then these girls start expecting it from the next SD. Don't be that guy.
-
Senior Member
Posts: 253
Details?
Originally Posted by AndrewT3333
[View Original Post]
I saw her twice. She was tough to hook up with, but both of us had scheduling issues. She was fun. Not really interested in hanging out for too long the times we met but wasn't hurried either.
What was the allowance? Details on what you did sexually? She has a nice phat ass. Anything bare?
-
Banned Member
Posts: 185
Ppm
Originally Posted by Truthfu11
[View Original Post]
Ok, let's hear the consensus. Do you ppm when the meeting is just an afternoon out? Or only compensate for times where there is something sexual going on? I have not been paying but am wondering what the norm is.
Normally meet for free at first. However, some girls who you look at and wonder how in the heck are they on the site, check all the normal boxes as far as going to college, seem decent, etc. I have started with some small donation with expectation I will just lose that money. It does seem to work on ocassion, but I derive more pleasure converting the platonic ones into something intimate, rather than banging the scank stripper being passed around.
The above are the type if you share that, they will just vanish. Smart, looks into their stuff, tries to stay relatively utr and anonymous.
I'd categorize the girls into three levels. The ones everyone can pass around, pros to semi pros type, the sort of middle ground of selective semi pros, and the only wants platonic, long shot.
-
Banned Member
Posts: 185
Originally Posted by Flipper12
[View Original Post]
Better fish in the ocean. This one is sure to end in dissapointment. How do I know? Read the shit she put on her bio:
Some of you are a complete waste of my time, I know what I want and I know MY WORTH. I can't stand the younger SDs because you guys play too many games because you think because you're young you don't have to bring more to the table, you do.
This screams of GPS and a shitty attitude if you do see her.
Fake tits, fake lips, fake ass. I'd recommend passing.
Tranny vibe there as well.
Posting Limitations
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|
|