Survey: Combining Riverside & San Bernardino

[blahblah111]

Not enough action in each to be worth separate sections.

[Big TB]

Takeit from the Rocker, hes lived out there 30 years +

"The two areas are much too large to be combined into one and the action is different for both."

[Member #5605]

Put the pressure on Jackson for the change. Not only does he think the poll results of this are "not conclusive", but apparently he thinks that making sure every member that asks for "membership upgrades" is more important then improving the ORGANIZATION of this board! Don't ask me why. He told me to "hold my horses". Sigh!

[J Men]

I think they should be seprate now more then ever becouse of the area code change. Dont you think Guy's ?

[rickenrack]

The action is very different in the two areas, and I think it would be best to keep them separate.

[Rocker149]

Gentlemen,

I have lived in the Inland Empire since 1972. The businesses along Valley Boulevard are pretty much the same as they have always been. In fact driving down Valley is almost like being stuck in time since very little has changed. There needs to be a section for San Bernardino and one for Riverside. The Riverside area would encompass Moreno Valley, Beaumont, Banning, and of course Riverside. San Bernardino would include Bloomington, Rialto and Fontana. The two areas are much too large to be combined into one and the action is different for both.

[Jay Bird 82]

All that I care about is a Tahoe board seeing that I will be there in a couple weeks.

Jaybird

[Member #5605]

Jackson e-mailed me today on the question noted below this post, stating that the "results are inconclusive". I can't see how, since its clear that the NO side has won the "poll". Pretty conclusive I'd say!

[TheMole]

Jackson,
How long are going to be running these surveys? Have you made a decision?

Just curious, since it has almost been 2 months, since the thread started.

[Catfish]

themole says:

"Maintaining them separate allows for the small holes in the wall to get some reports."

I agree with this concept as it does narrow down some areas of specific interest. For example, I had been looking for info in the Temecula/Murrietta area. Presently that area seems to be in its infancy so I have to search the entire Riverside thread to find what I want. This could be further hampered and the eternal hole-in-the-wall might be easily overlooked if the area were widened. I'm all for more options than less in order to pinpoint my interest, regardless of number of posts.

[OneNut]

I moved from Rancho Cucamonga a year ago. What a mistake! I am now in South Carolina where the massage parlor runs from .80 to 2.00 for FS. Anyway, I am trying to work my way back to the Inland Empire because of the great experiences provided by the hospitable women of the AMP's in the area. To my regret's, I did not find this website until I departed the area. If I return I would like to see a category titled Inland Empire which covers the Ontario, Upland, Rancho Cuca., Chino, Fontana, areas. Riverside and San B. are large enough to have their own site but there are plenty of opportunities between these two fine cities.

[Member #5605]

Actually, the community of BLOOMINGTON/FONTANA where all these wonderful AMP's with FS, etc. are, should have a category of its own, but given that Jackson has previously mentioned that a community needs to have at least 100K of people for its own post area, I guess in spite of all the luck mongerers have here that the community population is still an over-riding determinant. Makes me wonder how communities like: Del Mar, Cotati, Monterey, and other "smaller then 100k" populated communities still have their own areas. But it IS Jackson's board, and he can organize it as he wishes. Although I hope that he will keep in mind that it IS those of us that LIVE IN THE AREAS being posted about, that know its geographic accessability the best.

[Ewclark77]

Given the number of reports on the subject in the San Berdoo forum, I would say that Japanese Spa ought to have its own.

[Bob Amp]

I like the idea of breaking things into Counties first. So, I vote NO on combining Riverside and San Bernardino. In fact, my recommendation is to put the cities under the county (for example in Orange County, put Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, etc under the county - IF a city deserves it).

Anyway, those are my thoughts. Thanks Jackson. Great job.

[Webcams]

I would like to see everything broken down first by county then by particular city with action IE: Los Angeles County Ventura County Etc.