WYP, SA, and other SD sites

**SnowBlind95** · Today 17:47

I doubt this one is real. Would only use snap and I have used snap to communicate with real ladies in the past. Wanted to immediately sell me pics I told her no then the conversation ended. She or whoever is behind the account liked my profile and contacted me first.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...a-e0cbbb09c3b9

**Mcc110** · Today 16:33

Post 2736.

Non-Pro Woman on CL or BP. Page 37.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...r-BP&p=2508650#post2508650.

Message me if you want details.

Originally Posted by SLJim [View Original Post]

I have a date scheduled for later today was wondering if any of you have seen her before she looks familiar but I cannot put a name to the face. Wants 2. 5 for an hour.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...8-d58e07275e5c

**Shock55** · Today 16:06

I went to see her off her Tryst ad and left once I entered the room. It was a dump on Rt. 1. She has visible signs of use and looks to be a streetwalker with a phone.

Originally Posted by SLJim [View Original Post]

I have a date scheduled for later today was wondering if any of you have seen her before she looks familiar but I cannot put a name to the face. Wants 2. 5 for an hour.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...8-d58e07275e5c

**Itfcd** · Today 15:46

Originally Posted by SLJim [View Original Post]

I have a date scheduled for later today was wondering if any of you have seen her before she looks familiar but I cannot put a name to the face. Wants 2. 5 for an hour.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...8-d58e07275e5c

That's Elli, who's been talked about elsewhere and on the escort forum relatively recently. Has a Tryst ad; should be easy to find if you search Baltimore.

**SLJim** · Today 12:37

I have a date scheduled for later today was wondering if any of you have seen her before she looks familiar but I cannot put a name to the face. Wants 2. 5 for an hour.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...8-d58e07275e5c

**GoodNightBalt** · Today 12:28

Originally Posted by Mcc110 [View Original Post]

ElizaRay.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...1-9bc25d826197

She is real. Wanted 4 $ Pics accurate when I met. She was engaging conversationally and nice, but not my vibe.

**Mcc110** · Yesterday 15:57

PrettyPenny.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...c-3a92b3002768

Forgot to add link.

**Mcc110** · Yesterday 15:52

Both seem like they're real and have responded but also have also been very flaky.

ElizaRay.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...1-9bc25d826197

Said they were interested and passed their number along. Text and nothing, no response.

PrettyPenny.

I think has been talked about before. Also passes along number, no response. Messaged back weeks later and said try texting again but I had deleted it already. Asked for it again. No response.

Have a few leads. I will share when no more.

Not too much going on in Baltimore I feel though.

**Michael Taylor** · 04-25-24 10:51

Originally Posted by Shinshi86 [View Original Post]

Notice how the profiles he shared are all 30-something year-old Asians in Maryland, logged on for a day or two this year, and how the various "About Me" sections read like bad poetry or sweet-nothings? Those are enough clues to determine they're bots. They read like some basement dweller with a lot of time on their hands who's discovered ChatGPT and trying to set up traps in hopes of catching someone dumb enough to fork over the benjamins in a PBM scam.

Bottom line: normal (human) women don't write like that. And of course, the Seeking staff won't take down the highly suspect profiles because it pads their numbers. Hence why I just block anything that sets off my scam radar since the reporting button clearly doesn't yield results.

I've noticed that the number of favorites on my profile have gone up. Thanks for pointing it out.

**DildoBaggins77** · 04-25-24 10:36

Originally Posted by MichaelTaylor [View Original Post]

Other than the cheezy introduction text (but that was present before AI), what clues are you using to help you come to that conclusion. Just curious.

I don't have the screenshots I sent to Seeking / WYP support, but you used to be able to spot it in the "headline" section. For example, I generally use the "newest" tab over the "recently active" section of search so with all the results and headlines on one page, you could see the ones that were openly copy / pastes. I sent that to support, indicating there's likely someone scripting these accounts (since they're using the same naming conventions and profile content), but they seem more concerned with my profile content telling people with less than 2 pictures not to message me, than doing something about all these fake accounts. Unfortunately, the new seeking update took "headlines" out, at least in the app. Another way using the "newest" section is, I believe, it orders the profiles from most new to least new. So, if a profile randomly shows up down the page instead of as the newest, then I'm fairly certain its a person who's "hopping" from major city to major city with their profile. Hence why it suddenly showed up AND isn't the newest.

Other things I've noticed cross app / platform: they recirculate the same images so I've spotted those easily (or Pimeyes catches them); overly poetic / romantic; anything that just generally doesn't sound like something a human OR English speaker would say or how they'd say it (Google Translate doesn't always account for those sort of nuances or); in my experience, real people are more withdrawn when it comes to sharing intimate details on their profile, so if they aren't (and exhibit other signs) then it's likely fake; check where they're geolocating from. I. e. The "recent location" tile on their profile; they like going from major city to major city; (alongside other factors) they tend to favorite you after you view them, and without viewing your profile.

**SteveStone123** · 04-24-24 17:09

Another fake one. She reached out to me saying Hello . She want to use either telegram or whatsapp for communication.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...0-77ef52b8c2fc

**SteveStone123** · 04-24-24 17:00

Originally Posted by MichaelTaylor [View Original Post]

Other than the cheezy introduction text (but that was present before AI), what clues are you using to help you come to that conclusion. Just curious.

Most of them will try to ask you to connect through telegram / whatsapp and they will never give you a real working number.

**Shinshi86** · 04-24-24 16:46

Originally Posted by MichaelTaylor [View Original Post]

Other than the cheezy introduction text (but that was present before AI), what clues are you using to help you come to that conclusion. Just curious.

Notice how the profiles he shared are all 30-something year-old Asians in Maryland, logged on for a day or two this year, and how the various "About Me" sections read like bad poetry or sweet-nothings? Those are enough clues to determine they're bots. They read like some basement dweller with a lot of time on their hands who's discovered ChatGPT and trying to set up traps in hopes of catching someone dumb enough to fork over the benjamins in a PBM scam.

Bottom line: normal (human) women don't write like that. And of course, the Seeking staff won't take down the highly suspect profiles because it pads their numbers. Hence why I just block anything that sets off my scam radar since the reporting button clearly doesn't yield results.