Thread: 2005 Complaints about other Members
Closed Thread
Results 1 to 15 of 462
-
12-23-05 12:59 #462
Posts: 1773Originally Posted by James D 2004
-
12-23-05 12:19 #461
Posts: 221Originally Posted by Raynman55
-
12-23-05 12:00 #460
Posts: 734I have to second the motion. Eveytime I browse thru the new reports and see him name, I can fully expect an attack on someone. Normally I wouldnt give a c**p about what some one writes.... unless its a juicy report , but its getting old and serves no purpose on this board. I applaud you , Jackson, for giving us this valuable forum, but again, flames have no place here
Be safe!
Originally Posted by Joe Monger
-
12-05-05 02:07 #459
Posts: 450James D 2004 - California Boards
James D 2004 has on multiple occassions broken the No Flaming rule as cited in the "General Posting Rules". A small sample lies below;
No Flaming: Please do not post any messages that harrass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member.
12/04/05
Originally Posted by James D 2004Originally Posted by James D 2004Originally Posted by James D 2004
Originally Posted by James D 2004
Joe
-
10-20-05 09:09 #458
Posts: 503Re: Glenn 61
Rolly,
Well looks like you 'kinda' do your homework, that is respectable and I can/can't combat vs. that. I have moved one and it was just a complaint. That is what this page is for.
In addition, Glenn and I have mended our wounds. He and I have PM one another. Although we don't see eye to eye he did give me a background of his life and why he views things the way that he does. I still think that his views are fogged but I better understand his foundation.
If you notice, he took the pic of Dan Rather down. You did your homework but it was not complete, therefore you get an F for incomplete work.
Just like you, i can analyze what you said and completely obliterate it and break it into microscopic pieces for you. Honestly thouguh, at this point in time I don't want to waste the energy because I already have said what needed to be said. This post in itself is futile, but I guess I needed to put you at ease.
Having said that , please move on. If you are Glenn's "friend, " then you should know that he and I are cool before throwing stones so discriminantly. As I have previously stated and I will say it for the last time, it was just a complaint. At this stage of the ballgame, you are over analyzing and adding fuel to an already extinguished fire.
-007
-
10-20-05 08:46 #457
Posts: 527Originally Posted by Z3bondeye
Originally Posted by Z3bondeye
Originally Posted by Z3bondeye
Originally Posted by Lincoln Man
The average intelligent individual would agree that we don't have a whole lot of moral standing and should probably leave the soap box over in the corner.
-
10-15-05 16:47 #456
Posts: 156Offensive Behavior
From the Rules page:
No Offensive Posts, Links or Images: Please do not post any messages, images or links that are vulgar, hateful, threatening, racist, or discriminatory.
Originally Posted by Glenn61
-
10-14-05 22:34 #455
Posts: 503Originally Posted by Rolly Polly
The "tad" of humor that you refer to is what is offensive. As you well know, eventhough we as humans kid around, there is a CERTAIN, but yet limited truth to everything. That my friend, you cannot dismiss.
-007
-
10-14-05 12:21 #454
Posts: 527Glenn61
I'm going to strongly disagree with Z3bondeye on the facts that surround my good friend Glenn. Glenn's experience on the Miami streets and pictures he has provided far exceed the merit of this complaint.
Glenn is very clear that his posts are not generalizations, but rather observations of very specific and real people that he encounters. Those people, at times, fit a particular stereotype so Glenn adds a tad of humor to his post.
-
10-14-05 06:40 #453
Posts: 1339MrPotatoe
We have a category of poster here known as the "Suspicious Newbie" , but Mr·P is beyond 'suspicious' =
He is clearly an Agent Provocateur who is both totally opposed to the purposes of this web site , and trying to antagonize the peaceable Members here
For these reasons , he and his IP# should be *banned*
-
10-07-05 19:34 #452
Posts: 503Violator : Glenn 61 -Miami Forum
Dear Jackson,
Although Seniority is a much revered and desired position on this forum. Few would disagree that Glenn 61 has had great and at often times, fruitiful posts. However, I must un-willingly admit that what I view as racial re-marks, deprive him of untapped potential and respect among members.
Part of what makes this forum great is its wealth of knowledge, but above all, its diversity. I am speaking both in terms of content and its many ethniticities of which this site is comprised of. From my own personal view, Glenn 61 severely lacks ethical balance. His lack of sensitivity towards others greatly tarnishes his image.
He has unjustifiably and unknowly or knowinly, assaulted members of this forum with his sharp tongue. I don't want to build a case against a regular member, much less and somewhat of a respected celebrity in the Miami forum.
For your convenience and the convenience of others, I have included the following remarks, that of which can be edited at any point in time by the originator, but at the current they appear as follows.
1st Violation
Miami, Florida Forum
Post # 290 Titled: Winn Dixie girls are easy Dated 8-24.05 at 04:58 Glenn61 is cited as follows
Originally Posted by Glenn 61
2nd Violation
Miami, Florida Forum
Post # 293 dated 8-28-05 2nd to last paragraph states the following
Originally Posted by Glenn 61
Lastly
Miami, Florida Forum
Post # 315 dated 9-15-05
Originally Posted by Glenn 61
===================================================================
Post # 290 & # 293 are self-incrimating evidence and no elaboration or interpretation is needed on my behalf. Post # 315, Glenn61 tries to exonerate himself from accusations by colleagues and his futile attempt fails miserably. This is what you call racism, which is uncalled for IMHO.
I have voiced my opinions with him and he has let me known ( Post # 332 Miami) and I understand that he is not after a United Nations Ambassador chair. In additon, I also understand that he has a lot of personalities on his bandwagon. HOWEVER, I know that I am not the only one that has taken offense to his strong and bold advocation of his own selfish personal views.
With what little honesty and sincerity I may have left, I would not like to see him banned but would greatly appreciate a verbal warning on your behalf Jackson. I want him to be fair and to follow the guidelines just like I have. I just wish that he was more thoughtful of others.
Jackson, I know that you read the Miami forum as evident by your edits/comments/ etc.. I would love to hear a response. Whether that is negative or positive. Despite the current inflation, I welcome your .02 cents, for what ever they may be worth now.
-007Last edited by Best Tx Monger; 10-07-05 at 19:58. Reason: Modification / Revised
-
09-26-05 09:55 #451
Posts: 829Bluffcity on Memphis board
I like to vote to ban him and so would some other members ,he like some stalkker LE guy,very derogative and just out to get me,because I don't date cheap blk guy's they evidently have a hatred for white women. Also seems to have alot of info on law enforecement in our area.
Hey Jackson,
Lets throw his as out, probally to cheap to pay his membership anyway!
-
06-17-05 03:02 #450
Posts: 1282Have we done the math on Atldood?
I pulled this off of this post, addressing Atldood (Please forgive the blue Jackson, it is a quote):
Originally Posted by adminOriginally Posted by Atldood
The post outlined above is two.
This post is three.
Four.
Five.
Just my 2¢, probably not worth more.
LoveLOS
-
06-15-05 19:33 #449
Posts: 1339Offender = Street Hoolum
Offense = Spam
Scenes of the Crimes =
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...&postcount=577 and
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...&postcount=575
-
06-04-05 14:55 #448
Posts: 18tweedelD not tweedleD
I've already wrote 100 times I will not post bullshit, consider this my act of contrition. Is there any way of checking to see if Long Stroker is also posting as tweedelD {it might have something to do with some "personal mission" he's on. On second thought disregard this post.