"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[DDogs77]

Any info on her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...5-35f8050ecba3

Had a session. She was quick to reply (pm'd me after visiting her profile) and gave out her phone number. It was a negative experience. She had a really bad breath and wasn't really into it. Felt worse after. Will not repeat.

[TylerDurden07]

I've had enough with Seeking, it just sucks now. The best alternative I've heard about is SDM. Is anyone here using it? If so, what's the lowdown on it? Do you like it?

[LThomas777]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...d-6b86ca7f3f28

I sent you a PM.

[Peter Pan]

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...d-6b86ca7f3f28

[LoverAtl]

In the end. Every girl has a pussy. There is no lack of competition.

LOL. "I will never have to pay for sex, but you do. " Like Bane said in The Dark Knight Rises: "And you think this gives you power over me? Does this girl need reminding that there are a LOT of girls on that site, & other sites, who will gladly take our money?

[TylerDurden07]

She used to reside in Atlanta. Then moved to LA, now back to Atlanta, via Dallas, for vacation.

She contacted me also as we have had some prior business. Her recent msg, which really highlights her devolving 'tude: "You also know the power lies with the woman. That's why it's free for me to join, but you have to pay. I will never have to pay for s*x, but you do. "

Just for the record. Before she moved to LA, still residing in Atlanta. Met her 3 x for $200 ppm at her place. All bare, BBBJ and CIP. Was enjoyable as she is not unattractive or unskilled. But next she decided that CIP is off the table, so I called it quits.

LOL. "I will never have to pay for sex, but you do. " Like Bane said in The Dark Knight Rises: "And you think this gives you power over me? Does this girl need reminding that there are a LOT of girls on that site, & other sites, who will gladly take our money?

[Antioch]

https://members.seeking.com/messages...f-82364304bdb3

Wants a $200 advance for her pups sake so she can have them watched.

[LoverAtl]

She used to reside in Atlanta. Then moved to LA, now back to Atlanta, via Dallas, for vacation.

She contacted me also as we have had some prior business. Her recent msg, which really highlights her devolving 'tude: "You also know the power lies with the woman. That's why it's free for me to join, but you have to pay. I will never have to pay for s*x, but you do. "

Just for the record. Before she moved to LA, still residing in Atlanta. Met her 3 x for $200 ppm at her place. All bare, BBBJ and CIP. Was enjoyable as she is not unattractive or unskilled. But next she decided that CIP is off the table, so I called it quits.

Soundshennington's profile says Dallas, TX, but she said she recently moved to Atlanta. She reached out to me first and I asked her what she's looking for. She answered with a series of snotty messages about how I should have read her profile and she didn't spend her valuable time writing it to have her time wasted. Even when I wrote that I was just trying to make conversation she persisted with her onslaught. I wished her good luck in her search (because telling her that she's a beotch that I wouldn't see in a million years could get me reported) and she blocked me. YMMV, but I can't imagine trying to navigate an arrangement with an entitled, short tempered pain in the ass.

[TylerDurden07]

Soundshennington's profile says Dallas, TX, but she said she recently moved to Atlanta. She reached out to me first and I asked her what she's looking for. She answered with a series of snotty messages about how I should have read her profile and she didn't spend her valuable time writing it to have her time wasted. Even when I wrote that I was just trying to make conversation she persisted with her onslaught. I wished her good luck in her search (because telling her that she's a beotch that I wouldn't see in a million years could get me reported) and she blocked me. YMMV, but I can't imagine trying to navigate an arrangement with an entitled, short tempered pain in the ass.

I see those types occasionally. But I usually respond with a lot of attitude, & with a ton of sarcasm ("oh wow! You seem so nice!" right back at them. Don't take guff off these girls. You can respond in a way that won't get you banned. Just avoid profanity, ya know.

[Peter Pan]

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...f-25d64aae3186

Don't bother.

[Christian Troy]

I connected with these two Latinas on non-sugar dating apps and have sugar dates lined up. They both claim they've done this before but I've never seen them on any sugar sites (I did find their socials though). Anyone have any experience? I'll report back next week.

[NewAnonymousName]

Soundshennington's profile says Dallas, TX, but she said she recently moved to Atlanta. She reached out to me first and I asked her what she's looking for. She answered with a series of snotty messages about how I should have read her profile and she didn't spend her valuable time writing it to have her time wasted. Even when I wrote that I was just trying to make conversation she persisted with her onslaught. I wished her good luck in her search (because telling her that she's a beotch that I wouldn't see in a million years could get me reported) and she blocked me. YMMV, but I can't imagine trying to navigate an arrangement with an entitled, short tempered pain in the ass.

[NewAnonymousName]

You win. Nobody ever has security cameras aimed everywhere in their homes. There you go. Better? Ok good. Moving on.

I didn't say nobody does it. I said it's illegal because it is. But so is almost all of the "mongering" and SD / SB (at least PPM) being discussed on the boards. It's all good. I don't mean it as criticism of you. Each of us makes choices in this game that aren't necessarily the same choices everyone else would make.

[DaRiv]

Good luck arguing that a camera aimed at a bed or in a bathroom is for security purposes as opposed to ones aimed at the doors, windows and hallways. Don't forget that IT experts will tear through your devices to prove that you were using the feed to view clips for voyeuristic purposes. Also, even if you somehow win that argument, you still have no right under the statute to record someone, even for security purposes, where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy unless you have their consent. You'll need even better luck trying to argue that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a bedroom or bathroom and that signs at the entryways are somehow implied consent for the bedrooms and bathrooms. Finally, even if you somehow get acquitted, you would be publicly shamed.

This is my last post on the topic. It's illegal and it's a risk. Everyone else on the boards has gotten enough (probably more than enough, LOL) information to decide for themselves whether they agree with your misguided interpretation of the statute. And of course, as was said from the outset, lots of things are illegal (speeding, prostitution, etc.) that people regularly decide to do anyway. Everyone can evaluate whether to take that risk for themselves. I'm not telling them what to do, just laying out the legal background. Personally, I'm not risking a girlfriend or sugar baby discovering hidden cameras in my home.

You win. Nobody ever has security cameras aimed everywhere in their homes. There you go. Better? Ok good. Moving on.

[NewAnonymousName]

You actually made my point for me. It's lawful to do it for "security purposes". This is why it says it can be given to the district attorney or law enforcement if you needed to do so. Like with a nanny cam. So what if I'm paranoid and in have cameras everywhere in my home. That's perfectly legal. There was a story on this site I read about a guy who had a girl ubered over to his house. Turns out she had some thugs follow her in the uber. While he wasn't looking she unlocked the doors and just when we were about to get busy but thugs came inside, tied him up, and spent several hours robbing the entire house. Then left him there for 2 days until his family came home and found him tied to the chair. And if he had cameras in his home, it would have been perfectly legal for him to not only have them. But give them to the district attorney or the police so they can use them to try to catch and prosecute the criminals. And that those cameras inside his home happen to catch any other things going on, well it wouldn't matter because they were there for security purposes. The burden would lie on the state to try to prove that your cameras were not there for security purposes. And good luck doing that if you have terabytes of hard drive filled with security surveillance and everything else that happens in your home.

Good luck arguing that a camera aimed at a bed or in a bathroom is for security purposes as opposed to ones aimed at the doors, windows and hallways. Don't forget that IT experts will tear through your devices to prove that you were using the feed to view clips for voyeuristic purposes. Also, even if you somehow win that argument, you still have no right under the statute to record someone, even for security purposes, where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy unless you have their consent. You'll need even better luck trying to argue that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a bedroom or bathroom and that signs at the entryways are somehow implied consent for the bedrooms and bathrooms. Finally, even if you somehow get acquitted, you would be publicly shamed.

This is my last post on the topic. It's illegal and it's a risk. Everyone else on the boards has gotten enough (probably more than enough, LOL) information to decide for themselves whether they agree with your misguided interpretation of the statute. And of course, as was said from the outset, lots of things are illegal (speeding, prostitution, etc.) that people regularly decide to do anyway. Everyone can evaluate whether to take that risk for themselves. I'm not telling them what to do, just laying out the legal background. Personally, I'm not risking a girlfriend or sugar baby discovering hidden cameras in my home.