The Rat Trap

[PompanoGuy]

Then the C5 bullshit. You ridiculed me for having a fuckin' ' Bromance ' with C5 . And you censored me by putting C5 on my shit (ignore) list. I tried to fuckin' PM C5 & can't. Censorship. Be honest. Unfair.

OrlandoLover and LoveMeBaby were getting jealous.

[GeorgeMason]

Fuck it. Let's be honest. When I pointed out that C3 has no business dictating rules for writing reviews you said nothing to him. You legitimized him by flagging me & putting me on moderation. The best fuckin' part is that C3 doesn't even follow his own rules. Be honest. Unfair.

I don't remember C3 "dictating" rules for reviews, however he often seems to provide his advice and recommendations regarding what information might be valuable to the rest of us in a review.

You've told me to take my shit to the fuckin' Trap. And when I went to the Trap to deal with that fuckin' prick George Mason what happened. You sided with him even though he bad mouthed my mother. Supposedly mothers are ' off limits ' . You gave some weak excuse for siding with that asshole. Be honest. Unfair.

So you consider me a "fuckin' prick"? Coming from you, I'll take that as a compliment of the highest order! And I still say the best part of you ran down the crack of your Mama's ass, and ended up as a brown stain on the mattress!

Then the C5 bullshit. You ridiculed me for having a fuckin' ' Bromance ' with C5 . And you censored me by putting C5 on my shit (ignore) list. I tried to fuckin' PM C5 & can't. Censorship. Be honest. Unfair.

Hey, welcome to the club Bro, I can't PM C5 either. But I ain't trying to schedule a hook-up with him either. LMFAO!

And the ' sock account ' bullshit. I told you that I made another account in case my TH account got hacked. That other account has fuckin' confidential info in it that was entrusted to me. And when I PMd you politely asking to take a copy of that confidential info you said no. Spite. Be honest. Unfair.

"Hacked"? Who you kidding? A2 has this site locked down tight. Ain't nobody gettin' in where they don't belong, right A2?

And then when I went to the fuckin' Trap (like you told me) to kid around under ' notChris5 ' you lashed out at me. ' do this shit again, I fucking dare you ' . Be honest. Unfair.

A2 has a good sense of humor, but you tried his patience and crossed the line, Ms Poppins!

Oh, have a nice day Mr FairGuy.

Really? Don't you read this forum? With the quality pussy A2 gets on a daily basis where he is, there's no way he doesn't have a VERY nice day, EVERY day!

On this last point, On this day I am not. I am in a place that was formerly deep behind the Iron Curtain which is fucking PACKED with desperately poor, UNBELIEVABLY hot and fit women which I was positive would have one of the last great undiscovered P4P scenes and I literally couldn't have been more wrong. The single most frustrating place I have ever visited. Luckily I will be back in Latin America soon.

A2

[No Alibis]

No sir, by all means, please accept my apology. But, at the same time, please don't be offended for a person having an opinion.

I don't care if people have opinions, everybody is entitled to theirs. This was not an opinion, it was a misinformed incorrect accusation about favoritism.

A2

Lincoln was a tyrant, does the A stand for Abe?

Calling you out for lying about me makes me a tyrant? You really are a special kind of stupid aren't you?

A2

[TrailHunter]

When I disagree with one of his PETS A2 puts me on moderation for being argumentative cause he's unfair. FAVORITISM.

TH.

How right you are because anybody who criticizes Chris5 is on moderation.

Oh wait, except they aren't. Maybe,a nd I'm just spit balling here, maybe it's because you wouldn't fucking stop doing it wherever the fuck you wanted to do it instead of doing it on the trap. Maybe using sock accounts. Maybe it had something to do with you constantly accusing me of favoritism when they issue is you refuse to follow the TOS.

Naw, that can't be it. It can't be because of your behavior because like Mary Poppins you're just perfect in every fucking way.

A2

Fuck it. Let's be honest. When I pointed out that C3 has no business dictating rules for writing reviews you said nothing to him. You legitimized him by flagging me & putting me on moderation. The best fuckin' part is that C3 doesn't even follow his own rules. Be honest. Unfair.

You've told me to take my shit to the fuckin' Trap. And when I went to the Trap to deal with that fuckin' prick George Mason what happened. You sided with him even though he bad mouthed my mother. Supposedly mothers are ' off limits ' . You gave some weak excuse for siding with that asshole. Be honest. Unfair.

Then the C5 bullshit. You ridiculed me for having a fuckin' ' Bromance ' with C5 . And you censored me by putting C5 on my shit (ignore) list. I tried to fuckin' PM C5 & can't. Censorship. Be honest. Unfair.

And the ' sock account ' bullshit. I told you that I made another account in case my TH account got hacked. That other account has fuckin' confidential info in it that was entrusted to me. And when I PMd you politely asking to take a copy of that confidential info you said no. Spite. Be honest. Unfair.

And then when I went to the fuckin' Trap (like you told me) to kid around under ' notChris5 ' you lashed out at me. ' do this shit again, I fucking dare you ' . Be honest. Unfair.

And when you disagree with members you call them nasty names. Like ' douchebag ' , ' asshole ' , ' stupid ' , ' idiot ' . You compared me to Mary Poppins ' perfect in every way ' . I'd bet my last dollar that if I pulled this shit on you I'd be fuckin' banned. Be honest. Unfair.

And that's TH's defense.

Oh, have a nice day Mr FairGuy.

And notice how you're not banned. So there goes that theory Ms Poppins.

Chris5 is a pain in my ass and will never not be moderated. Would you care to know the difference between you two? ALL you do is fucking whine and make excuses for yourself and he never does. Neither does C3.

Of course I broke up the bromance, you seem to forget, the forum is about pussy not you two teaming up on people. You may note that Chris hasn't complained about it.

Go buy some midol

A2

[DisturbedOne]

There is some funny petty middle school drama on this thread. You guys crack me up.

[No Alibis]

Another one of you "why don't you make the rules the same for everybody" whiners.

The "2nd antagonistic violation" has a very specific reference. One; it's on the redact text that the idiot rewrote. Two; that reference is to a specific violation, if you log out in order to read the posts of a member who has been placed on your admin ignore list in order to then comment on them AND you do THAT thing two times, then you will be banned. Just read the post, you literally quoted something, then tried to use that to "prove" I play favorites when the thing you were using didn't say what you think it did."

"Given that the author could only have read the other member's post by deliberately logging out, reading the post, copying it, logging back in and then responding, the only possible interpretation is that the author of this report was deliberately intent on antagonizing the other member and/or otherwise looking for trouble. Such deliberately antagonistic behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning."

Chris5 has never done that even once and you need a remedial reading class.

Are you planning on apologizing for being both wrong and an asshole for accusing me of that? Probably not, none of you guys seem to have that kind of integrity.

A2

No sir, by all means, please accept my apology. But, at the same time, please don't be offended for a person having an opinion.

I don't care if people have opinions, everybody is entitled to theirs. This was not an opinion, it was a misinformed incorrect accusation about favoritism.

A2

[Chris5]

This Is A Special Message To All The People Who Just Hate Chris5.

There's an old joke;.

A guy is in the woods hunting for bear. He sees the bear and takes a shot but just grazes it and shoots off half an ear which angers the bear.

The bear charges him, before he can reload and shoot again the bear is on him. He breaks the guys rifle and bends him over a fallen tree and fucks him in the ass and walks away.

All year long the guy is plotting his revenge. He's going to kill that fucking bear. So the next year he waits for the bear with half an ear. Finally he sees him and lets fly a shot, but he misses again and blows half of the bears other ear off.

Sure enough the bear charges, breaks his gun and ass rapes him over another tree, then just walks away.

Now the guy can't stand it, he jumps up, grabs his broken rifle and takes a shot and shoots half the bears tail off.

The bear is fucking furious, he turns, charges, grabs the guy, bends him over yet another tree branch, but before he fucks him he leans down and whispers in the guys ear;.

"You aint here for the hunting are you?

[NoFear101]

Actually, when opening the forum a member is not logged in, so logging out isn't necessary.

As for the 2nd antagonistic violation, wouldn't you agree the member in question is well beyond the limit?

Of coarse, that is unless different rules apply to certain members.

Are losing respect and making us all look bad (especially to new members) over some kind of jealous drama for what purpose? To slam a fellow respected senior member for what? His opinion on how to monger? Please give us all a break! Whatever happened that fraternity and brotherhood andthe struggle to find good pussy? Just saying, you're supposed to proud your brother's here, not participate in bullshit.

[Chris5]

You don't want to go down this road.

Thank you M2 for those pic's. Beautiful model like hooker's indeed.

C5.

[Chris5]

Complete waste of time and money! I see many many monger's bragging about table showers, shitty massages, and hand job's. My question is pretty simple, WHY pay 300 buck's to a MP chick who throws a bunch of lotion on you and gives you a HAND JOB? Am I missing something in this picture?

Being stupid really out of hurt.

C5.

[Admin2]

Actually, when opening the forum a member is not logged in, so logging out isn't necessary.

As for the 2nd antagonistic violation, wouldn't you agree the member in question is well beyond the limit?

Of coarse, that is unless different rules apply to certain members.

Another one of you "why don't you make the rules the same for everybody" whiners.

The "2nd antagonistic violation" has a very specific reference. One; it's on the redact text that the idiot rewrote. Two; that reference is to a specific violation, if you log out in order to read the posts of a member who has been placed on your admin ignore list in order to then comment on them AND you do THAT thing two times, then you will be banned. Just read the post, you literally quoted something, then tried to use that to "prove" I play favorites when the thing you were using didn't say what you think it did."

"Given that the author could only have read the other member's post by deliberately logging out, reading the post, copying it, logging back in and then responding, the only possible interpretation is that the author of this report was deliberately intent on antagonizing the other member and/or otherwise looking for trouble. Such deliberately antagonistic behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning."

Chris5 has never done that even once and you need a remedial reading class.

Are you planning on apologizing for being both wrong and an asshole for accusing me of that? Probably not, none of you guys seem to have that kind of integrity.

A2

[No Alibis]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the author was responding to a post by a member who was previously placed on the Author's Ignore List. Given that the author could only have read the other member's post by deliberately logging out, reading the post, copying it, logging back in and then responding, the only possible interpretation is that the author of this report was deliberately intent on antagonizing the other member and/or otherwise looking for trouble. Such deliberately antagonistic behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.

Because you have shown an inability to understand that this drama will not be tolerated on review threads I've put that member on your admin ignore list.

You may not comment about people I have placed on your ignore list on any thread in the forum and that includes the Rat Trap. *** emphasis added ***

You will either accept this or you will be breaking in a new user.

We're being told we can respond (blue) and cannot respond (red). A little clarity would help.

Are you being obstinate or are you just fucking stupid?

You add a section to the redact text that isn't there, then ask what you can do AFTER I TOLD you what you can do and now you're still whining.

I don't think you're here for the pussy.

A2

Actually, when opening the forum a member is not logged in, so logging out isn't necessary.

As for the 2nd antagonistic violation, wouldn't you agree the member in question is well beyond the limit?

Of coarse, that is unless different rules apply to certain members.

[Montes2]

Really? Say what you really mean and that is: for a poor surfer guy, Sissy Chrissy 5 gives me personal guidance to get really cheap car dates from drugged out street walkers whose facial complexions resemble the landscape of the Moon craters and all.

You don't want to go down this road.

[PompanoGuy]

[Deleted by Admin]

This was asked and answered, you're starting to piss me off.

A2

[TrailHunter]

I've been down this road before where the purveyor of lies can say whatever he wants about me and I'm not allowed to respond or I'd be banned.

When I disagree with one of his PETS A2 puts me on moderation for being argumentative cause he's unfair. FAVORITISM.

TH.

How right you are because anybody who criticizes Chris5 is on moderation.

Oh wait, except they aren't. Maybe,a nd I'm just spit balling here, maybe it's because you wouldn't fucking stop doing it wherever the fuck you wanted to do it instead of doing it on the trap. Maybe using sock accounts. Maybe it had something to do with you constantly accusing me of favoritism when they issue is you refuse to follow the TOS.

Naw, that can't be it. It can't be because of your behavior because like Mary Poppins you're just perfect in every fucking way.

A2