Thread: Rants and Raves
+
Add Report
Results 4,051 to 4,065 of 8109
-
11-06-20 18:03 #4059
Posts: 2254Originally Posted by ILuvEmall [View Original Post]
-
11-06-20 17:12 #4058
Posts: 344The code
Lick there pussy till they cum LOL.
-
11-06-20 15:01 #4057
Posts: 824Simple Solution
Originally Posted by Admin2 [View Original Post]
-
11-06-20 14:27 #4056
Posts: 63Half the Country voted for Trump PERIOD
Originally Posted by SgtSoros [View Original Post]
-
11-06-20 10:06 #4055
Posts: 2254Originally Posted by Bullett64 [View Original Post]
Unfortunately, the political madness continues in Georgia into the new year with both our Senate races heading into a runoff. Georgia will now be overwhelmed with negative ads through the upcoming holiday season in the midst of a pandemic rapidly spiraling out of control.
-
11-06-20 09:40 #4054
Posts: 471If you want to get into those kind of comparisons, I would argue that neither Norway nor Denmark has near the amount of industry that Sweden does, so neither make a good comparison on that basis. And Sweden has said all along that their approach is a long-term approach. It makes no sense to be drawing conclusions at this point, especially based on a single snapshot in time. Of course overall numbers of neighboring countries who are in lockdowns will be lower during those times, that's only common sense! The premise all along has been that this is only delaying the spread of the virus (while causing other health and economic damage in the meanwhile). I think this has been borne out by those countries that have locked down and opened back up, and seen the corresponding virus spikes. Do you contend we should have locked down the entire world since March? And again, you do not address or even acknowledge the adverse effects that the lockdowns have on peoples' physical, mental, and economic well being. This has been documented and can be witnessed through increased depression, suicide, and murder rates, and decreases in physical health levels.
I think Sweden's approach of reasonable distancing and practical living is a perferctly rational way to go about handling this pandemic. They are now taking precautions to shelter the elderly and infirmed, and so long as their hospitals are not overwhelmed, there is no need for them to cripple their entire country by shutting down the nation.
Originally Posted by Bullett64 [View Original Post]
-
11-06-20 08:48 #4053
Posts: 1610Win the battle, lose the war
Originally Posted by Bullett64 [View Original Post]
-
11-05-20 22:04 #4052
Posts: 307Originally Posted by ILuvEmall [View Original Post]
You are free to disagree. But thanks for the civil discourse.
-
11-05-20 21:17 #4051
Posts: 471Thanks for the links, I appreciate that. But I noticed you quoted selectively, and left out some important parts:
"As to the two-week cumulative number of COVID-19 cases per 100,000, Sweden has 293, Denmark 233 and Norway 97.3. The corresponding number of deaths is 0. 7 in Sweden and Denmark, and 0. 1 in Norway. ".
Comparing Sweden and Denmark, the recent numbers don't seem that different, and Sweden doesn't seem worse than others. That is backed up by the numbers reported here as well: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/. Looking over those numbers, I see many, many countries practicing lockdowns in far worse shape than Sweden.
Now, Sweden itself will be the first to admit it made mistakes in the way it handled the elderly in the early days of the Coronavirus. I think the whole world had a lot to learn about Coronavirus at that time, and no one got it 100% right, and sacrifices were made in one form or another causing loss of life, whether or not that is officially recognized in the stats or not. As your post said, "The Future" let's focus on that and not waste time looking back at past mistakes, except to learn from them. Looking at the more recent numbers, I don't see the basis for your case. And particularly not when you take into account the socioeconomic impacts that you don't care to address. Norway and Denmark happen to be very wealthy countries that can afford to lockdown, but that's not the case for most countries. And I won't get into the impact this has on the world supply chain and those 3rd world countries and lives lost there, which believe me, dwarf the COVID losses (now estimated at 1. 2 M vs the 9 M lives estimated by the WHO to be lost due to the economic impacts of the COVID shutdowns).
I also don't agree with your point about Sweden changing its stance. There's nothing in those links that indicates any drastic change in Sweden's original recommendations, only that they are perhaps tightening up on those recommendations and beginning to enforce those, instead of relying solely on voluntary compliance. So what if their PM got COVID and had to self-isolate? That's common sense. That has no bearing whatsoever on their approach to COVID- it's completely irrelevant and nothing but sensatiionalism, just as the rest of the content was sensationalized. I hardly see this in the light that you presented it- that their model has "crumbled" and they need to implement "stern" measures while they wait on a vaccine. Life is going on for the Swedes, they're not hiding in a cave waiting for a vaccine.
-
11-05-20 17:33 #4050
Posts: 307Originally Posted by ILuvEmall [View Original Post]
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireSt...cases-74034905
https://news.yahoo.com/sweden-regist...131318859.html
When comparing countries, geography and thus climate, plus population dispersion, become important factors.
Sweden raised eyebrows around the world earlier this year when it decided to keep schools, gyms and restaurants open and not issue a national mask mandate, though in past weeks it issued new restrictions such as limiting the number of people who can sit together at a restaurant to eight.
The Nordic country has had 141,764 confirmed coronavirus cases in total, including 4,034 new cases reported Thursday. Just over 6,000 people have died. The tallies surpass those of its neighbouring countries, including Denmark, which has had 50,530 cases and 729 deaths, and Norway, which has counted 21,954 cases and only 282 deaths.
-
11-05-20 14:18 #4049
Posts: 471Originally Posted by Bullett64 [View Original Post]
Now, if you take into consideration on top of that the socioeconomic impact of these "stern measures", not just on said country implementing them, but worldwide, you have to wonder who the enemy really is? No one knows how long a vaccine might take, or how effective that vaccine might be, or for how long it might be effective. I don't think the world can afford to go hide under a rock while we wait on a vaccine, and I don't believe that's the healthiest thing for the world, either. We can agree to disagree, but we can't agree that you're going to impose your "stern measures" on everyone else.
BTW, I think it's apparent that the rest of the world doesn't necessarily agree with these stern measures either, witnessed by the protests against lockdowns taking place in many European countries now.
-
11-05-20 10:28 #4048
Posts: 307The future
Can we finally stop all the bullshit about how one party is going to decimate the other in this election. As I write this, we still don't know who the next President will be, and even after the counting has ended, challenges, recounts, and lawsuits will keep thing muddled for the foreseeable future. What we do know is that this country deeply and evenly divided and that if we cannot figure out a way to work together we are screwed. Somehow, somewhere, reason must prevail.
At least the end of the election will allow us to get serious about the Covid virus. Over 100,000 new cases yesterday shows that our current tactics have been unsuccessful. The vaunted Swedish model has crumbled and they have come to the realisation that ignoring the problem will not make it go away. Unfortunately stern measures are necessary on a temporary basis until a vaccine is developed and distributed.
In the words of Pogo, "We have met the enemy and he is us. ".
-
11-02-20 08:09 #4047
Posts: 427Fellow redneck here
Don't even got to state anything to him. This Tuesday election results will tell what America wants.
Originally Posted by Mike454 [View Original Post]
-
11-01-20 22:24 #4046
Posts: 75President Trump rally in Rome GA tonight 11-01-20
-
11-01-20 19:49 #4045
Posts: 201Hey, not all of us rednecks.
Originally Posted by ST0808 [View Original Post]
Some of us rednecks are more educated than you, with very high IQ's, and don't take kindly to being called racist.
You liberals talk a big game on here, but I promise you, this is one redneck, that you would not call racist in person.
Just don't group everyone together, libs are notorious for the name calling, but can't back it up.
But hell, what do I know, I'm just a dumbass redneck. LOL.
Oh yea, some of the smartest, kindest, most successful people ,Ive known DID NOT attend college. For whatever reason.
Typical liberal, talking down to the uneducated... really? What a closed minded thing to say.
How does it feel to be better than everyone else?
Liberal elitism,gotta love it.