NoVA SugarBabies

[Max #01]

Start chatting with this one, her name is Scarlett. Tells me she's in town (Fairfax) visiting for two weeks because her sister just had twins. We text and she sends me some ssssssmoking hot nudes. So I ask what's her ppm, that's when she mentions she's a pornstar, her screen name is Scarlett Alexis and she charges a deposit upfront fml. Says she can either host at the Airbnb she's renting or come to you. Once she mentioned the deposit I stopped with the conversation so idk what her actual ppm is but she's hot if you're willing to pay the deposit upfront.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...d-0424c215a7f4

Just searched on her name. Yep, she's a legitimate porn star.

[BDM1227]

I have a photo of me (a real one) that is still sanitized, w / dots on the face. It was to avoid facial rec. I have used it as the basis for search on facecheck before. At some times, I have gotten hits, and I have asked them to remove the hits. So I did supply them w / a 'real' pic of me, but as I said, sanitized. They claim that they delete the pic supplied and don't keep any records. I guess I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.

That is a photo I will send to POTs once I have spoken to them by phone and I think meeting them is possible. Before that, the photos I have on the seeking site are of someone who sorta looks like me, but they are also cut off as if they are me, to give the impression I am trying to stay under the radar (and also avoid them getting mad that I gave them fake pix).

Scammer hit me this week. Sends me aa text with all sorts of info threatening to out me. Told them to fuck off and eat my ass.

Face check using my SA pics my linkedin came up came up using that.

[BDM1227]

Privates not flattering? What does this mean?

Private photos. Not good.

[Pathfinder04]

Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.

Privates not flattering? What does this mean?

[Rudy Wellz]

Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.

Had an initial phone conversation. Heard the entire crazy life story and about several of her SD's. She was persistent about the fee for meeting, which I declined repeatedly. Never saw private photos, but it sounds like I'm not missing much.

[Dimples572]

Start chatting with this one, her name is Scarlett. Tells me she's in town (Fairfax) visiting for two weeks because her sister just had twins. We text and she sends me some ssssssmoking hot nudes. So I ask what's her ppm, that's when she mentions she's a pornstar, her screen name is Scarlett Alexis and she charges a deposit upfront fml. Says she can either host at the Airbnb she's renting or come to you. Once she mentioned the deposit I stopped with the conversation so idk what her actual ppm is but she's hot if you're willing to pay the deposit upfront.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...d-0424c215a7f4

[Emesdee]

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...c-54a09d66369d

Conversation became business-like after initial few messages. Seems like she got jaded from the site pretty quick in the couple months she's been on. Asked for $1,000 PPM and I said good luck.

[Emesdee]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

Wants money just to meet (apparently a SD from the site told her she shouldn't be meeting men on the site for free). That, plus the fact that her privates aren't exactly flattering, put an end to my pursuit early.

[TomFordModel]

She is a waste of time and effort. Gives different responses to diff people at diff times. The last one I got was quote "It starts with an initial meeting where you are not allowed to touch me. That chance to woo me costs $300."

Look at her pics she's fat and old. She needs to pay me.

[JonFisher]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

She is a waste of time and effort. Gives different responses to diff people at diff times. The last one I got was quote "It starts with an initial meeting where you are not allowed to touch me. That chance to woo me costs $300."

[FogHorn1]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

She's certainly open about her life right? "I'm broke and lonely" after pissing away her life savings attempting to be a day trader. LOL Jeez!

In any case, I do recognize the pic of her holding the camera, but I don't remember seeing any specific reports on her.

[SRH59]

I have a photo of me (a real one) that is still sanitized, w / dots on the face. It was to avoid facial rec. I have used it as the basis for search on facecheck before. At some times, I have gotten hits, and I have asked them to remove the hits. So I did supply them w / a 'real' pic of me, but as I said, sanitized. They claim that they delete the pic supplied and don't keep any records. I guess I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.

That is a photo I will send to POTs once I have spoken to them by phone and I think meeting them is possible. Before that, the photos I have on the seeking site are of someone who sorta looks like me, but they are also cut off as if they are me, to give the impression I am trying to stay under the radar (and also avoid them getting mad that I gave them fake pix).

Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I did do the opt out on pimyes, not as a member, and didn't have to upload a picture. I recall just clicking on the hit that came up (linkedin) and they removed it from the search. Oddly, Facecheck didn't hit on that same picture buyt pimeyes did.

I'll share a picture in the seeking chats if I trust the girl. But still one of those ridiculous mirror selfies hiding my face a bit (I'm too old for this shit, LOL). I fully believe sharing a real picture pays off with legit SBs, but it only takes one bad actor to level a world of regret on you.

Got to get some type of check going. While it is so painfully obvious to spot the 12 hour old hot chick profiles, the comfort gained by facecheck (when it was free) is sorely missed.

[Rudy Wellz]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

[FarFarAway]

I think at least part of the rationale behind uploading your own photo is that it gives you an opportunity to opt out of their search function, which could be helpful. At that point, I suppose it's a question of how much do you trust them to be not-scumbags?

I have a photo of me (a real one) that is still sanitized, w / dots on the face. It was to avoid facial rec. I have used it as the basis for search on facecheck before. At some times, I have gotten hits, and I have asked them to remove the hits. So I did supply them w / a 'real' pic of me, but as I said, sanitized. They claim that they delete the pic supplied and don't keep any records. I guess I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.

That is a photo I will send to POTs once I have spoken to them by phone and I think meeting them is possible. Before that, the photos I have on the seeking site are of someone who sorta looks like me, but they are also cut off as if they are me, to give the impression I am trying to stay under the radar (and also avoid them getting mad that I gave them fake pix).

[Itfcd]

Does pimeyes make you upload a picture of yourself to get a membership? I got a prompt for that. I also tried to use an amex gift card to pay but it rejected it. I'm wondering if you can cancel at a later point without having them keep charging.

I think at least part of the rationale behind uploading your own photo is that it gives you an opportunity to opt out of their search function, which could be helpful. At that point, I suppose it's a question of how much do you trust them to be not-scumbags?