Her ad profile. Added one image showing how massive her ass is and she is slim. The pictures really don't show how slim and thick she is. Much thicker in person.
She has been on the same digits since last year. Never reviewed her but she looks better in person. Her skin was glistening. Head game awesome. Real nice etc. I'll do a proper review. Time crunch.
I guess the slim big booty Colombian Lorena over shot your eye lids. There is another chick with a BBL. Surprised no one has mashed her thick ass yet. Not a single review of her here. I saw her last year too and she still around in the same vicinity. You all are asleep! She was nice, good hygiene, gorgeous from head to toe. Pussy grip needs some work though but I did smash her after smashing another chick. Head game sloppy as fuck. All you hear is slurping. When she gives head she arches that ass. Amazing view! Asleep weebs!
I know the term "big booty" is subjective and varies by individual, but there was a time this thread had good emphasis on "phat".
Times have changed!
If you know the term is subjective and varies by individual, then the second part of your statement is negated by the first. Additionally, if you feel something say it with your chest. We're all grown.
I was trying to be subtle, but, yeah, you pretty much nailed it!
I guess the slim big booty Colombian Lorena over shot your eye lids. There is another chick with a BBL. Surprised no one has mashed her thick ass yet. Not a single review of her here. I saw her last year too and she still around in the same vicinity. You all are asleep! She was nice, good hygiene, gorgeous from head to toe. Pussy grip needs some work though but I did smash her after smashing another chick. Head game sloppy as fuck. All you hear is slurping. When she gives head she arches that ass. Amazing view! Asleep weebs!
I've seen this one in Norcross a couple times. Maybe 5 times or so. Never had a problem with her. Can be a challenge to get a response at times. Pics are accurate. Did qv with bbj every time for 80.
Face 5/10.
Body 7. 5/10 (heavy set bbw but if booty size in criteria she gets a lot of points there).
Hygiene 6/10 (no odors or smells but never freshly showered.
Sex 7/10 (doggy is nice, bbj is decent, she can take it rough).
I've seen this one in Norcross a couple times. Maybe 5 times or so. Never had a problem with her. Can be a challenge to get a response at times. Pics are accurate. Did qv with bbj every time for 80.
Face 5/10.
Body 7. 5/10 (heavy set bbw but if booty size in criteria she gets a lot of points there).
Hygiene 6/10 (no odors or smells but never freshly showered.
Sex 7/10 (doggy is nice, bbj is decent, she can take it rough).
I've been seeing her since last September. I posted a report about her on September 20, I think it was an escort section. She is laid back. She has a big ass but it's more hips than ass. Her 80 QV deal is awesome. She is open to anything except hair pull and name calling. She'll let you nut on her face but only the side because she doesn't like it in her nose. Last time I saw her she didn't have any condoms so she was going to do BBFS but that's not my thing. So she just sucked me until I nutted in her mouth, and she swallowed. She takes direction well. She not much to look at (IMO she's cute) as she is older and there's grey in her hair, but if you like a mature older woman, with a big ass, that definitely see her.
I've seen this one in Norcross a couple times. Maybe 5 times or so. Never had a problem with her. Can be a challenge to get a response at times. Pics are accurate. Did qv with bbj every time for 80.
Face 5/10.
Body 7. 5/10 (heavy set bbw but if booty size in criteria she gets a lot of points there).
Hygiene 6/10 (no odors or smells but never freshly showered.
Sex 7/10 (doggy is nice, bbj is decent, she can take it rough).
Thanks for the review. I've always wondered about this one. The tattoos, her short thick stature, and that picture of her bent over always made her a tempting option but the pricing with no bbj at least is much.
Sandra Dallas is a made up name since she doesn't use an alias in her ad. Only for searching purposes. Decided to link up with "Sandra Dallas" as I liked her overall classy look. It was an easy process to link up with her. Had to call and she was very polite and nice over the phone. The rates are in her ad. $. 70/80 hhr, $. 20 qv, $$. 40 hr. Do I agree with these rates. Nah. Gave me the address to a hotel which was nice and clean. She was waiting for me at the door in lingerie. She is quite short. Maybe 5 foot 3. No idea but she is a small pumpkin. Nice pedicure, her nipples looked better in person. Looked like some porn star titties. The line down her belly seems like a C section. Had some tan lines, blonde hair and a little tummy. Thick ass thighs. Room was clear and got ready for some action. Put a bag one and she started off with a good CBJ. It was good and wet. Brought her ass around and rubbed her pussy, played with her boobs and the soles of her feet felt nice. Sucked me good before we went to missionary. She spread her legs nice and wide and I went in for a dive. Didn't need any lube and slid right in. Pussy had some good grip but over time it seemed to get looser as I stroke more. Wanted her short self on top and she did so for a short while. Ass looked nice. Her little pucker needed some even though it is off limits LOL. Got her in doggy and finished. Face looks wise I'd give her a 7. Had her make up on in person, ass isn't super thick but in doggy it is a nice view, nice titties to be sucked on, does foot jobs if you want and releasing on her ass is allowed. But I'm not sure if it is on a case by case basis or not. Worth the entry price? I think there is better TBH however she was good.