Thread: Los Angeles County Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 7,276 to 7,290 of 9573
-
06-11-19 14:13 #2298
Posts: 666Originally Posted by HapaBoy86 [View Original Post]
They changed the pics again on Erika.
Her original pics now.
-
06-10-19 19:16 #2297
Posts: 6849Originally Posted by QuestBMuffin [View Original Post]
-
06-10-19 14:21 #2296
Posts: 12Originally Posted by Duke1973 [View Original Post]
She is on the shorter side.
-
06-10-19 08:51 #2295
Posts: 459Go for it
Originally Posted by BobLove [View Original Post]
And while you're busy with them that'll leave true-ultra-feminine XX chromosome spinner Taylor as well as Cona, Haven and others more open appointment times for me and other guys who would prefer the post-ops from Itaewon would stay there.
Geez, try to give guys a heads-up and get ambushed. Typical L. A. D-bags. And you wonder why girls don't want to work here.
-
06-10-19 04:43 #2294
Posts: 167Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]
Regardless, her tits are huge but not great, kinda chunky and barebacks easily so if your into that go for it.
-
06-10-19 03:16 #2293
Posts: 91Fat Ass Korean WG.
Originally Posted by VincentFreemen [View Original Post]
Thank you in advance.
-
06-10-19 02:09 #2292
Posts: 91Poor girl
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty [View Original Post]
-
06-10-19 00:24 #2291
Posts: 2892Best advice
Stop TOFTT if you get disappointed back to back. Ask question here and if I am interested then I will TOFTT or if I know something I will answer. Best advice is to post here about the girls you guys like. I have another new young beautiful girl to post about in a week. My review is going to suck because I have tunnel vision from trying to BB. That's why I call myself a boner.
Those fake reviewers read this site and probably review girls we talk about here. I posted that link to Kate a week ago in Korean BB and there was no recent review. You may think those guys are not clever but someone still fall for them. Some new guys may believe Yoco new number is real.
Originally Posted by Veni1 [View Original Post]
-
06-10-19 00:13 #2290
Posts: 76What is the "fruit store"? Can't you just spell it out?
Originally Posted by VincentFreemen [View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 23:47 #2289
Posts: 2892Laura
Booker is probably right. I saw Laura awhile back. Not her pics so I can't say if you will see same girl I saw. I haven't seen Amber, Julie, and Erika yet but I know about Erika. Been too long to remember much but I thought Laura was attractive, nice body and natural B cups, good service. I think she is more attractive and younger than both Shannon and Taylor but YMMV. Worth a try. I don't know why she can't stay long at one place.
By the way, she started out from NorCal.
Originally Posted by TickingTock [View Original Post]
-
06-09-19 23:34 #2288
Posts: 99SAG ladies
Been some talk about Taylor and Shannon lately. Wanted to know what people have thought about the other ladies at sag. I recently asked for "feedback" on the ladies and was told that Laura was better than Taylor from the Booker. Mind you they also recommended Viki to me before, and that wasn't great. I've seen Taylor a few times, but curious to know if they are being upfront with their recommendations.
-
06-09-19 19:56 #2287
Posts: 20Toftt
Took a few FTT.
Aly (asian ********).
Photos: Fake. Pics do no resemble person.
Looks: Okay. Skin tone is more dark, same goes for the nipples. Fit build.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: B- attitude. As if she is wearing a mask.
Service: Serviceable. BBBJ, fiv, cfs.
Ye-seul (fruit store).
Photos: Fake. Eyes are similar to the photos, not the chin though.
Looks: Good. Fit build, nicely augmented Ds, with kinda inverted nipples.
English: Able to communicate.
Attitude: A+ attitude. GND like. Down to earth, very frank.
Service: Serviceable. Nice and slow BBBJ. Cfs. No fiv.
Bagel (kte).
Photos: Fake.
Looks: Okay, build. A bit chunky.
English: Good.
Attitude: A attitude. GND like. Super chill.
Service: Aimed to please. A bit aggressive, but I can take it.
-
06-08-19 18:21 #2286
Posts: 413Fake pictures and fake reviews
It's truly unfortunate but it looks like the kgirl scene has descended into a situation where getting any real information on a gal is becoming near impossible. First off, there are the pictures which in so many cases have gone beyond "glamorizing" or photoshopping. Many are just out and out fake pictures of models. My advice here is that if she looks too good to be true and is charging $250 - 300 per hour, be prepared to get screwed, and not in the literal sense. With fake reviews on the monkey site, the guys posting them aren't even being clever. Take the latest review of Yoco. Yoco has had the same phone number for years, now there's a new review with a totally different number. And no matter that she has been in Japan for the last two months. And then there's the review of Kate, EMID 270146. This is the Kate that was booked by M, and she has been gone from the LA scene for two years, much less ever having done outcall service.
I'm grateful this board exists so as to provide some semblance of reality. Hopefully more reviews will be posted here and guys will be honest in posting how the gals really looked.
-
06-08-19 16:02 #2285
Posts: 2892Shannon
She might have started out at the standard rate but I saw her after she got popular. She is still very popular now. I didn't call her beautiful or pretty but about 70 TER reviewers gave her 8. 7 in looks. Her body is definitely very hot to me. Those big round hooters are very well done. Her sensuality also makes her better than many girls I saw.
Don't try to contact her at the number below but these are her real and accurate pics. I have seen her recently. Her face is blur but you can see what DHorn is talking about if you look closely. Her butt has gotten bigger and rounder than pics now. I made the mistake of not seeing her sooner because I didn't like her face in the pics. It doesn't matter if some guys don't like her, just mean it's easier for me to see her. Peace.
https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/s...1e53edc98b4735
Originally Posted by TomKeen [View Original Post]
-
06-08-19 15:31 #2284
Posts: 2892Naughty Tiffany
Are you talking about this girl? Haven't seen her yet but I thought about seeing her 3 years ago because of the same photos below. I can try her when I have nobody else to see.
She had about 46 reviews on TER and 7. 5 on looks and 7. 72 on performance. I usually see girls 8 or above on looks and performance. Her profile was 5. 0, 100 lbs, 34 D-24-34.
https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/a...1e53eeac8b45b0
Originally Posted by ShipItFres [View Original Post]