The Morality of Prostitution

[Yellowjack]

Been seeing this girl for years. I found out that she was an actress and discovered a bit more about her personal life online. I also discovered that she is married and her husband seems like a very nice and religious dude. Her lifestyle is very very comfortable, she travels all the time and always wears expensive clothing. She is a D lister but has a big online following. I can't help but wonder, how has she managed to keep a double life for many years? Where does her husband think she gets all this extra cash. She sees very high end celebs and often travels on their jets. I feel like shit every time I see her lately!

There is no evidence in the scriptures that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute. That was a trope the early / medieval church used to smear her, when certain groups of Christians were revering her more than Mary, Mother of Jesus. Some think those groups equated her to Jesus' wife.

[MongerSeeker]

I reading this article with this girl that complained how awful and emotionally traumatizing etc. I always try & be nice to working girls because I know it is rough for them. But if they make a choice to it than it is there issue. I here these girls complain how awful it is to have sex with a older guy. In my mind that is part of what they are getting paid for. If they do not like it they should find other work. This is one reason I stick to SW's besides price. When a gilrl works the street she has the option of quitting regardless if she has a pimp or not. If she does not like it she flag down a cop or catch cab etc... Now this isa easy choice. But they still have option if they have the will to do it.

https://psyche.co/ideas/the-reality-...x-it-is-simple

[DCoffeePa]

Great movie for anyone interested in a top-notch, entertaining take on the subject. Free on Hulu right now.

Agree, great movie.

[DarkClouds]

Great movie for anyone interested in a top-notch, entertaining take on the subject. Free on Hulu right now.

[MarkTwoThoUSA]

Been seeing this girl for years. I found out that she was an actress and discovered a bit more about her personal life online. I also discovered that she is married and her husband seems like a very nice and religious dude. Her lifestyle is very very comfortable, she travels all the time and always wears expensive clothing. She is a D lister but has a big online following. I can't help but wonder, how has she managed to keep a double life for many years? Where does her husband think she gets all this extra cash. She sees very high end celebs and often travels on their jets. I feel like shit every time I see her lately!

[Ausse Salt]

Morally prostitution is a sin. That being said, prostitution has been committed by many people in the Bible. I don't believe they will ever make prostitution legal. It's a good thing, because I would probably spend more than I should on them.

Hee Hee! Don't know how much "moralitys" there is with prostitutions and what-not, but I surely agree that prostitutions do go all the way back to Biblical times. That friend o' Jesus, a lovvy named Mary Magdelin was maybe the very first worker I ever read about in the Bible books. Though she surely got religion and retired from the hobby once she met Jesus and what-not.

Not quite sure if the hobby was legal way back in those days, since I wasn't around back then.

# Salty.

[MulchMan]

I should have made reference to my post #21285 in the escort reports. But things went south as soon as I opened the door.

Got it. Thanks for the review.

[WondererDude62]

Morally prostitution is a sin. That being said, prostitution has been committed by many people in the Bible. I don't believe they will ever make prostitution legal. It's a good thing, because I would probably spend more than I should on them.

[BangTango]

UKW, Democrats are not Liberals. Some have very liberal (progressive) leaning and some are very conservative. Both Republicans and Democrats sponsored and voted for this horrible law, and it was the smart move. If you vote against it you will have to deal with it in November. You voted against a law that was aimed at helping sex trafficking victims. Only Rand Paul could vote against it on Libertarian principals. This was one of the few times he was right about something. Democratic have never been pro-prostitution but are not so vehemently opposed to it in all forms. It was Republicans who use this as smoke screen to keep the masses from seeing what their agenda really is. The lying anti-sex trafficking activist got no where during the Clinton Administration but the Bush Administration took them in with open arms and implemented many of their policies. To get foreign aid for HIV prevention you have to have policies against prostitution and you could not support abortion. Republican embrace this Democrats don't. What they did with Sesta / Fosta was to conflate all prostitution with under aged forced prostitution on a federal level. This law may be over turned in the courts because on it's surface it seems to be clearly unconstitutional but that will take time.

I never understood how loyalty to a political party could cause people to vote against their own economic interest. If you are not a multi millionaire and you are a Republican then you are an idiot. The Republican party has been hostile to the New Deal since Roosevelt got it passed. It was amazing to me to see all of the rural Republican die hards who hated Obama Care but loved the ACA get up in arms when the Repubs got control of all branches of government and aimed to scrap it. I guess its tribalism. Also, the Democrats did not start the #Me Too movement. That too is a lie.

"I never understood how loyalty to a political party could cause people to vote against their own economic interest. If you are not a multi millionaire and you are a Republican then you are an idiot".

Aint that the fucking truth!

[MongerSeeker]

I was down in Tijuana last week and I saw this girl Olivia. Olivia told me that she was Brittany's step sister and Brittany had been arrested was going to be deported to the US since she has outstanding warrants. Olivia also told me that Brittany wore a wig since had cancer and was receiving treatment. Olivia tried blaming Brittany's customers for her drug habit. I have been with Brittany quite often over the years and don't feel guilty about her habit. In my mind it is ultimately the girls choice how she spends her money. Drug users support their habit from work or other ways so this is also why I don't feel guilty. Now I feel empathy that they do have a drug habit and try to give some words encouragement to stop or at least reduce their consumption. In the end I ultimately believe that the deportation is probably best for her and hope comes to the realization that she needs to get off the dope is able to get the help she needs.

[Cheech1]

I have to agree with Admin 2's comments about what is going on here. The united States, while being touted as the most free country, the best place to live, etc. , is not what it seems. Its like having 150 people standing on a field, (countries), all being beaten with bats, and the one who got a few less whacks with a bat claiming to be the least hurt, and proud of it. The USA is going to hell fast, you just have to be able to see the forest thru the trees and be willing to look for it. This country hasn't been free since the war of secession (commonly known as the civil war), in fact, freedom started to go down the tubes at the time of the Whiskey Rebellion, when George Washington used federal troops in Western Penn. to impose a tax on whiskey being made in that area by Scottish farmers who were making moonshine and not paying taxes on it. It is now at the point that no one in the USA actually owns property in the sense that ownership implies, except for churches, government bodies and government controlled institutions. If you don't agree, just try not paying property taxes and see what happens to "your property."

The government is run by people who run for office with campaigns which are paid for by their contributors, the campaigns brainwash the people, and the pols do the bidding of those who line their pockets. Look at the recent president Obama, check out his worth now and before he was elected president. Believe me, he doesn't have what he has thru his abilities as a lawyer. They become a tool of the military industrial complex and do the bidding of their masters. All this to-do over Trump? He was already wealthy and might, just might not have masters to report to, so he's getting smeared. In the end, though, it doesn't matter. The politically correct bullshit will continue. The government will manufacture more and more reasons to shrink freedom.

This is a lesson learned by looking at past governments attempts to repress the people's freedoms, and comparing them to the old story about the frog in the pot of water. The government slowly nibbles away freedom in the long run, tightening the screws as the people get used to it. Tends to prevent revolutions. Like slowly increasing the fire under the pot as the frog gets used to the heat and slowly cooks to death, instead of dropping the frog into boiling water, where he will struggle mightily to escape.

Cheech

[OhMY08]

How do you guys fit these mental gymnastics in your head. All three branches are controlled by one party. One and only one party. They passed a law. See that pronoun there THEY (the party in power) passed a law. You can talk all you want about how many of them voted against if you want to avoid talking about how many of them voted for it but THEY passed this law. You are quick to claim tax cuts because you like them but anything you don't like is somebody else's fault. Though to be honest libertards do the same thing that republiturds do.

If the polite fiction is that the USA is a representative democracy, then if not the people who voted them in who is responsible? I avoid liberal feminists as much as the next monger but who is responsible for fosta / sesta is all the politicos that rely on the lunatic religious fringe (they same people who called Donald J Trump the "righteous" candidate) for re-election. If you're a Republican than your guys did this end of story. It's going to be interesting if the supreme court majority that your guys forced on the nation by refusing to consider any nominated by the previous administration upholds the first Ex Post Facto law the US has ever had and which are specifically prohibited in the constitution.

I guess if that happens you guys will find a way to blame that on Nancy Pelosi as well. What I find funny is the argument where you guys think one of these groups of assholes represent your interests in any way. They don't. It's not a representative democracy, it's an oligarchy. Neither side of the aisle gives a fuck about you and they use issues like this to keep you guys fighting with each other while they literally steal your rights away in front of your eyes.

Divide and conquer, oldest trick in the book except for possibly "Tricks".

Unite.

Stay stong.

It's US vs. Them!

Enjoy the show.

[Firestorm31]

Interesting thread about the sosta / festa controversy.

It sucks it passed the way it did. I suspsect it was just a way to make them look good.

[Rebrobate218]

But how do you explain this: When George W. Bush was president (2000-2008), a Republican, sexual establishments were everywhere, and in excellent quality. No one was shutting them down. The presence of AMPs (and not only Asian but also Euro and Black) was an assured thing in every city. Even a sleepy Baltimore suburb like Owings Mills had no less than 5 MPs, all excellent-quality with cute women. The GOP agenda never interfered with the commercial scene. The Iraq war was raging, the economy was booming, it was a Republican in the White House, and AMPs were abundant everywhere you looked.

The scene actually deterioriated during the Obama years, around 2010-2013. That's when things really died down, and cops started enforcing anti-prostitution laws.

Keep in mind that the Dems (liberals) are responsible for introducing #MeToo, a pernicious new Puritan movement, that seeks to wipe out sex or sexual context from all daily life. Somehow radical leftist feminists are now succeeding in curbing men's sexual options. Men are no longer able to flirt with women at work; if you've been following the news there will soon be no cheerleaders or beauty pageants due to 'objectification of women,' and pretty soon strip clubs and porn may get banned or tightened, as well. Our life is about to change dramatically as the sexual behaviors that we took for granted will now be labelled harassment or worse. But this won't be done by conservative Republicans, it will be done by. Liberal Democrats. The liberal Democrats are now the new Puritans who want to purge all sexual activity. Every time I watch the news, or read the paper, it's about #MeToo, harassment lawsuits, objectification of women, etc. Pretty soon you'll have to sign a written contract before you even so much as touch a woman on the arm. Note that the people who brought us this devastating new trend are liberals / Dems.

UKW, Democrats are not Liberals. Some have very liberal (progressive) leaning and some are very conservative. Both Republicans and Democrats sponsored and voted for this horrible law, and it was the smart move. If you vote against it you will have to deal with it in November. You voted against a law that was aimed at helping sex trafficking victims. Only Rand Paul could vote against it on Libertarian principals. This was one of the few times he was right about something. Democratic have never been pro-prostitution but are not so vehemently opposed to it in all forms. It was Republicans who use this as smoke screen to keep the masses from seeing what their agenda really is. The lying anti-sex trafficking activist got no where during the Clinton Administration but the Bush Administration took them in with open arms and implemented many of their policies. To get foreign aid for HIV prevention you have to have policies against prostitution and you could not support abortion. Republican embrace this Democrats don't. What they did with Sesta / Fosta was to conflate all prostitution with under aged forced prostitution on a federal level. This law may be over turned in the courts because on it's surface it seems to be clearly unconstitutional but that will take time.

I never understood how loyalty to a political party could cause people to vote against their own economic interest. If you are not a multi millionaire and you are a Republican then you are an idiot. The Republican party has been hostile to the New Deal since Roosevelt got it passed. It was amazing to me to see all of the rural Republican die hards who hated Obama Care but loved the ACA get up in arms when the Repubs got control of all branches of government and aimed to scrap it. I guess its tribalism. Also, the Democrats did not start the #Me Too movement. That too is a lie.

[Admin2]

How do you guys fit these mental gymnastics in your head. All three branches are controlled by one party. One and only one party. They passed a law. See that pronoun there THEY (the party in power) passed a law. You can talk all you want about how many of them voted against if you want to avoid talking about how many of them voted for it but THEY passed this law. You are quick to claim tax cuts because you like them but anything you don't like is somebody else's fault. Though to be honest libertards do the same thing that republiturds do.

If the polite fiction is that the USA is a representative democracy, then if not the people who voted them in who is responsible? I avoid liberal feminists as much as the next monger but who is responsible for fosta / sesta is all the politicos that rely on the lunatic religious fringe (they same people who called Donald J Trump the "righteous" candidate) for re-election. If you're a Republican than your guys did this end of story. It's going to be interesting if the supreme court majority that your guys forced on the nation by refusing to consider any nominated by the previous administration upholds the first Ex Post Facto law the US has ever had and which are specifically prohibited in the constitution.

I guess if that happens you guys will find a way to blame that on Nancy Pelosi as well. What I find funny is the argument where you guys think one of these groups of assholes represent your interests in any way. They don't. It's not a representative democracy, it's an oligarchy. Neither side of the aisle gives a fuck about you and they use issues like this to keep you guys fighting with each other while they literally steal your rights away in front of your eyes.

If you are referring to FOSTA, I wouldn't be too quick to point my finger at those who voted Republican in the last election as being responsible for its passage. In the House, 14 Republicans opposed passage of the act, only 11 Democrats did. In the Senate, there were only two Senators who opposed passage--one Republican, one Democrat. As is clear, support for its enactment was overwhelming and bipartisan.

But how do you explain this: When George W. Bush was president (2000-2008), a Republican, sexual establishments were everywhere, and in excellent quality. No one was shutting them down. The presence of AMPs (and not only Asian but also Euro and Black) was an assured thing in every city. Even a sleepy Baltimore suburb like Owings Mills had no less than 5 MPs, all excellent-quality with cute women. The GOP agenda never interfered with the commercial scene. The Iraq war was raging, the economy was booming, it was a Republican in the White House, and AMPs were abundant everywhere you looked.

The scene actually deterioriated during the Obama years, around 2010-2013. That's when things really died down, and cops started enforcing anti-prostitution laws.

Keep in mind that the Dems (liberals) are responsible for introducing #MeToo, a pernicious new Puritan movement, that seeks to wipe out sex or sexual context from all daily life. Somehow radical leftist feminists are now succeeding in curbing men's sexual options. Men are no longer able to flirt with women at work; if you've been following the news there will soon be no cheerleaders or beauty pageants due to 'objectification of women,' and pretty soon strip clubs and porn may get banned or tightened, as well. Our life is about to change dramatically as the sexual behaviors that we took for granted will now be labelled harassment or worse. But this won't be done by conservative Republicans, it will be done by. Liberal Democrats. The liberal Democrats are now the new Puritans who want to purge all sexual activity. Every time I watch the news, or read the paper, it's about #MeToo, harassment lawsuits, objectification of women, etc. Pretty soon you'll have to sign a written contract before you even so much as touch a woman on the arm. Note that the people who brought us this devastating new trend are liberals / Dems.