click for FREE hookups
Organized German FKK Club Tours since 1995
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
Ava Escorts

Thread: Sugarbabies?

+ Add Report
Page 386 of 565 FirstFirst ... 286 336 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 436 486 ... LastLast
Results 5,776 to 5,790 of 8469
This blog is moderated by MisforMaster
  1. #2694

    SincyCinammon

    Had a dream about her earlier this week. Very enthusiastic, enjoys what she does. Clean notel room, no smoke smell. She was dressed in a sexy little outfit. Don't know who wrote earlier that she was with LEO, but I don't think so. I will repeat.

  2. #2693
    Quote Originally Posted by CinMiner  [View Original Post]
    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...e-e1e4dbb4c390

    Went to text fairly quickly. Agreed to meet, said all she would to was a "BJ" (her words). Price for said BJ: $250, says she has never gotten less than that for a BJ. I told her that was at or above market price for full service. She offered to meet and greet to negotiate if I would compensated her for her time. I didn't bother to ask how much that cost. Declined!
    Yes severe case of GPS.

    Previosuly she expected $1000 for a meet.

  3. #2692

    Lynnli97 GPS

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...e-e1e4dbb4c390

    Went to text fairly quickly. Agreed to meet, said all she would to was a "BJ" (her words). Price for said BJ: $250, says she has never gotten less than that for a BJ. I told her that was at or above market price for full service. She offered to meet and greet to negotiate if I would compensated her for her time. I didn't bother to ask how much that cost. Declined!

  4. #2691
    Senior Member


    Posts: 602

    Good Points

    You're absolutely right. I've been lucky enough to have found a few of those, mostly by blind chance than any crafty strategy on my part. And these are not girls really looking for $$, somewhat shockingly. Case in point, recently came across an 18 yr old (yes, I checked her identification) that simply had a daddy kind. No money, just fun. Tight and firm in all the good ways but fairly inexperienced, which of course allows me to demonstrate my "prowess". LOL.

    Many of these girls are just tired of asshole guys their own age. I remember what I was like then and I have to admit, I agree with their assessment.

    On with the hunt!

    Quote Originally Posted by FarFarAway  [View Original Post]
    It is true that there is some of that in every local bowl. The one's you need to be seeking out are the girls who really are into older guys. They likely have some kinda kink, and it's your job to figure that out. Lots of girls in the bowl are submissive, I ask early on if they are the type that 'likes their man to be in the lead'. Subtle, but often they just blurt right back 'I'm very submissive'. Those, you'll not get turned down based on your photo provided you're really not gross. They *want* an older guy. They know what we look like. I have done many that are ⅓ my age.

  5. #2690
    Quote Originally Posted by JLZ61  [View Original Post]
    My experience was a bit different. I connected with her shortly after she appeared. Good conversation for a dozen texts or so. She is a student at Miami in Oxford and open to P4 P. Then she said that since she has no transportation it won't work. And she can't host, either. No pic was shared and our chat was quite benign. Not sure why she bagged.

    As for girls that disappear after pix are shared, I find that to be pretty common. I'm neither super good looking nor super bad looking. Pretty average but I'm thinking many of these girls, especially those who are on here looking for gifts because, they just "know" they "deserve" them, tend to think that the SD they "deserve" should look like Mr. Clooney. And I'm no Clooney!! Already unrealistic expectations on the part of millennials fueled by SA fantasy stories result in low success rates.
    It is true that there is some of that in every local bowl. The one's you need to be seeking out are the girls who really are into older guys. They likely have some kinda kink, and it's your job to figure that out. Lots of girls in the bowl are submissive, I ask early on if they are the type that 'likes their man to be in the lead'. Subtle, but often they just blurt right back 'I'm very submissive'. Those, you'll not get turned down based on your photo provided you're really not gross. They *want* an older guy. They know what we look like. I have done many that are ⅓ my age.

  6. #2689
    Senior Member


    Posts: 602

    Kaycoch1

    My experience was a bit different. I connected with her shortly after she appeared. Good conversation for a dozen texts or so. She is a student at Miami in Oxford and open to P4 P. Then she said that since she has no transportation it won't work. And she can't host, either. No pic was shared and our chat was quite benign. Not sure why she bagged.

    As for girls that disappear after pix are shared, I find that to be pretty common. I'm neither super good looking nor super bad looking. Pretty average but I'm thinking many of these girls, especially those who are on here looking for gifts because, they just "know" they "deserve" them, tend to think that the SD they "deserve" should look like Mr. Clooney. And I'm no Clooney!! Already unrealistic expectations on the part of millennials fueled by SA fantasy stories result in low success rates.

    Quote Originally Posted by CinMiner  [View Original Post]
    Started pleasant, I did share photos, she "Read". Ghost ever since.

    Seems an uptick in new girls who are playing games and not really serious.

  7. #2688
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2494
    Quote Originally Posted by CinMiner  [View Original Post]
    Started pleasant, I did share photos, she "Read". Ghost ever since.

    Seems an uptick in new girls who are playing games and not really serious.
    Yes, there seems to be a lot of naïve 18 &19 yr old, ingénues on the site lately who think someone is going to pay them just for their companionship. However, as we all know, there are guys out there who contribute to that perception. This one seemed ready to go for 200. I am not that attracted to her and the distance is an issue as well, so I will not pursue, but she seemed sincere to me.

  8. #2687

    Same here

    Started pleasant, I did share photos, she "Read". Ghost ever since.

    Seems an uptick in new girls who are playing games and not really serious.

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    We were chatting pleasantly and I was about to make my offer. She asked to see my picture. I shared a disguised photo and she blocked me. It may be sour grapes but she does seem awfully innocent and, at 18, is a bit under my normal cutoff.

    Bam.

  9. #2686
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1672

    Kaycoch1

    Quote Originally Posted by JizMan  [View Original Post]
    She seems innocent to me but is surprisingly up for P4P. She may not be a beauty, but cute enough.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...5-4ae31bfafc3d
    We were chatting pleasantly and I was about to make my offer. She asked to see my picture. I shared a disguised photo and she blocked me. It may be sour grapes but she does seem awfully innocent and, at 18, is a bit under my normal cutoff.

    Bam.

  10. #2685

    Good to go?

    Quote Originally Posted by JizMan  [View Original Post]
    She seems innocent to me but is surprisingly up for P4P. She may not be a beauty, but cute enough.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...5-4ae31bfafc3d
    Did you partake? Were services good? Allowance she is asking for?

  11. #2684
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2494
    She seems innocent to me but is surprisingly up for P4P. She may not be a beauty, but cute enough.

    https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...5-4ae31bfafc3d

  12. #2683

    Hotchasity

    Saw this one last week. Would not recommend. Strange personality and some hygiene issues. Better choices out there.

  13. #2682

    I won't lie.

    I had a slow work day and I've been screwing with whoever these girls are all day. Just totally messing with them every time they beg for money. I thank the people on this board who tipped me off and giving them a dose of their own medicine is worth it.

    Quote Originally Posted by WarlockKy  [View Original Post]
    The word is SCAM.

    This is a group of at least two (2) girls and one guy that work out of Ashland, KY.

    Here's the old Columbus one: https://seekingarrangement.com/membe...8-49fcd0688d81 (614) 382-0314.

    This is the last Cincinnati one: https://seekingarrangement.com/membe...1-e68ed74304cd (513) 437-1517.

    And the PayPal for both: lexisweety27@aol.com.

    Text\Sext with them long enough and you can tell when the "shift" changes and as always, she has no gag reflex, no limits, everything is on the menu, etc, etc, etc.

    A friend of mine got their source IP (Spectrum Ashland KY) and got both a burner (606 AC) number and a real (606 AC) because they didn't setup Google Voice correctly and when they called.

    It went through their Android dialer, not voice.

    Here's some of the normal batch of pics they send, feel free to add to the collection:

  14. #2681

    Dude, NO ONE WILL

    Quote Originally Posted by BDiddy19  [View Original Post]
    Has anyone actually met this broad? Been going back and forth with her (she's already asked for $300) but has sent some additional pics. Not sending her a dime but she appears hot and talks a good game. Am curious if anyone has actually bed her down?
    The word is SCAM.

    This is a group of at least two (2) girls and one guy that work out of Ashland, KY.

    Here's the old Columbus one: https://seekingarrangement.com/membe...8-49fcd0688d81 (614) 382-0314.

    This is the last Cincinnati one: https://seekingarrangement.com/membe...1-e68ed74304cd (513) 437-1517.

    And the PayPal for both: lexisweety27@aol.com.

    Text\Sext with them long enough and you can tell when the "shift" changes and as always, she has no gag reflex, no limits, everything is on the menu, etc, etc, etc.

    A friend of mine got their source IP (Spectrum Ashland KY) and got both a burner (606 AC) number and a real (606 AC) because they didn't setup Google Voice correctly and when they called.

    It went through their Android dialer, not voice.

    Here's some of the normal batch of pics they send, feel free to add to the collection:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails noname3.jpg‎   unknown.jpg‎   unknown1.jpg‎   unknown4.jpg‎  

  15. #2680

    So I'm curious.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cincy  [View Original Post]
    When asking here where she was located so that I could coordinate a nearby hotel, she gave me a location that called the street a court and in a location that is all retail. Nyet!
    Has anyone actually met this broad? Been going back and forth with her (she's already asked for $300) but has sent some additional pics. Not sending her a dime but she appears hot and talks a good game. Am curious if anyone has actually bed her down?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape