Sugarbabies?

**EndlessBanquet** · 09-01-22 12:52

I have been in discussion with her and getting to know each other over social media for a bit. She went dark for a couple months and looks like she is on the hunt again as she just reached out. Have not met for a meet and greet yet but we had agreed to high level terms. You can reach out to me for details.

Originally Posted by RobPeters513 [View Original Post]

Any insight on this?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...a-f7b90d73ace5

**Hooter12** · 09-01-22 01:44

Just out of the blue suspended by seeking. Can't imagine why. I haven't spoken to anyone in months just getting a lot of hits from fake ads supposedly from other countries. Strange.

**WarlockKy** · 08-31-22 22:23

Originally Posted by Decatur21 [View Original Post]

Is it me or has the selections on Seeking been really bad lately. Lots of older women and escort types. Not as many young hotties. Isn't this the time when all the young college girls should be getting on Seeking?

The "regulars" started showing up over the last week or so, its not that they aren't there, the sheer volume of the others outweighs them and if they haven't changed anything on their profile since they previously disabled their account it they will not show up as new.

**Decatur21** · 08-31-22 21:51

Is it me or has the selections on Seeking been really bad lately. Lots of older women and escort types. Not as many young hotties. Isn't this the time when all the young college girls should be getting on Seeking?

**BamBam** · 08-31-22 16:46

Here is the current list before it gets too long:

MysticalModel, Classic crypto-scammer!.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...0-3046a36d0726

FoxyNerd: Hot Asian PhD grad working in office admin?? "I am very happy to use seeking, I want my dream girl to appear soon" "I am not looking for sugar daddy".

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...f-93eb9abd6ddd

BeautifulVenus: Lena, classic crypto-scammer, taking me straight to text, very poor English, https://mobile.twitter.com/yunxi1988, loves to chat.

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...4-7915072e46c2

LovingDancer: Classic crypto-scammer.

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...9-2d60075acdfc

Vera was SmartMadame: Dumb scammer. Using pictures from Elsa Jean for the second time in recent memory. https://www.twpornstars.com/ElsaJeanxxx, location is now Grand Rapids. Gave me a Kenyan Paypal. I am surprised she is still active. Seeking is slow this week.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-3248232560bd

BAM.

**BamBam** · 08-31-22 16:43

Originally Posted by Weekender69 [View Original Post]

Anyone had any experiences with this one thinkin about takin the plunge? Think she is on fb too, I found her in SA.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...4-7ed5e56e2188

She has had multiple profiles since 2017. We met for a MnG several years ago. She comes and goes. She is real, pretty cool and cute but may or may not be a bit heavy. Per her SM she lost weight.

I will send PM.

BAM.

**Weekender69** · 08-31-22 11:39

Anyone had any experiences with this one thinkin about takin the plunge? Think she is on fb too, I found her in SA.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...4-7ed5e56e2188

**RobPeters513** · 08-31-22 00:30

Any insight on this?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...a-f7b90d73ace5

**Anvil** · 08-30-22 08:44

Originally Posted by AlanDodson [View Original Post]

This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.

The photos she sent me look like the little red discussed just a few posts down as having a new profile.

She might be doing multiples. Or it's her sister.

**BamBam** · 08-29-22 15:42

Five days worth and a lengthy haul:

Fungirl: Pic seller with a nasty attitude. Shares her real number which gets her PII.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...c-eb2938925d12

OpenToIdeas: Says she is not living in Cinti. Will move here in the Fall. Wants an arrangement between now and then.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...c-edd2ed7ee3cb

BrilliantCutie: Very odd profile! Married, 30, 6+ kids, 4'7", mixed, true love but profile shows FB verification.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-b51747587173

Baileykits: Likely Kenyan pic seller. Lazy and using a pic of Ireland Baldwin. Won't last long.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...6-8108363e1d13

SurprisedDancer: scammer language, poor English.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...4-9304720ec39d

CulturedMusician: Pic seller! Using a number from Iowa. If you call you get a girls voicemail but the message is unclear. Shares hot pics but using a guys paypal.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-06333ab6f0fc

Indianababy: Pic/video seller. Repeat profile. Got banned once before.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...6-55a2bce2a4af

HumbleGorgeous: "I do a down deposit of $50 and anything after that I'm free game" YMMV?

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...1-e8f9a7507bad

BrilliantModel: Classic crypto-scammer, told me we have chatted before and that I am repetitive. I apologized.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...f-79f3d3c5b523

Sexy: recent login = Australia, picture is all over the place: https://www.regional-kleinanzeigen.d...e-escort/5500. Offered to do sexy FT for a pmt to her cash app. Blocked me when I declined. https://www.tiktok.com/@elizabethanthony21?lang=en.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...d-91f8ffe0a0ad

BAM

**BamBam** · 08-29-22 15:40

Originally Posted by toddcincy [View Original Post]

seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so.

More discretion should be used when talking about the seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

One of my sbs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off seeking.

amen!

Bam.

**AlanDodson** · 08-29-22 13:38

This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.

Originally Posted by Ginzo666 [View Original Post]

I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.

**Todd Cincy** · 08-29-22 11:59

Originally Posted by BamBam [View Original Post]

This also reinforces the fact that handoffs in the sugar bowl rarely work out well. Some women may be seeing a different SD every week but they still do not think of themselves as pros. As soon as they think they are being treated like an escort, they will cut off the offending guy (s). Of course, this can be a way of painlessly ending an arrangement that has run its course. Choose wisely.

BAM.

Seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so. But one of the good things about it was that Seeking had not yet attracted the attention of online forums like this.

In 2017 to 2018, with the passage of SESTA / FOSTA, Seeking was inundated with the scammers that used to operate on BP and CL. But it was also inundated with guys who were looking for $60 "streetscorts", and that turned off many of the women.

I'm not saying that it's bad to have this section of the forum. The environment has much changed since the old days, and this is a valuable place to bring attention to scammers. (Scammers were comparatively rare on Seeking in the old days.) Almost no college girl, however, wants to have her digits tossed back and forth in a forum like this.

It's good to publicly expose the Seeking scammers. By all means. Post the profiles. Name and shame.

More discretion should be used when talking about the Seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

One of my SBs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in Cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at Miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on Seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off Seeking.

**Ginzo666** · 08-29-22 00:20

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...4-5e77e760468b

Seems to be a deposit scammer. Wants $150 CashApp, then $150 at the meet. Claims this covers the whole month. Also claims schedule is really flexible. I could ask for a video verification, but this is TGTBT.