click for FREE hookups
Rubrankings.com
Click here for the best Sugarbabies
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation
Ava Escorts

Thread: Sugarbabies?

+ Add Report
Page 101 of 565 FirstFirst ... 51 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 151 201 ... LastLast
Results 1,501 to 1,515 of 8461
This blog is moderated by MisforMaster
  1. #6961

    Blue Eyed Queen

    This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

    Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ginzo666  [View Original Post]
    I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.

  2. #6960

    Second that on the Fight Club rules

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    This also reinforces the fact that handoffs in the sugar bowl rarely work out well. Some women may be seeing a different SD every week but they still do not think of themselves as pros. As soon as they think they are being treated like an escort, they will cut off the offending guy (s). Of course, this can be a way of painlessly ending an arrangement that has run its course. Choose wisely.

    BAM.
    Seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so. But one of the good things about it was that Seeking had not yet attracted the attention of online forums like this.

    In 2017 to 2018, with the passage of SESTA / FOSTA, Seeking was inundated with the scammers that used to operate on BP and CL. But it was also inundated with guys who were looking for $60 "streetscorts", and that turned off many of the women.

    I'm not saying that it's bad to have this section of the forum. The environment has much changed since the old days, and this is a valuable place to bring attention to scammers. (Scammers were comparatively rare on Seeking in the old days.) Almost no college girl, however, wants to have her digits tossed back and forth in a forum like this.

    It's good to publicly expose the Seeking scammers. By all means. Post the profiles. Name and shame.

    More discretion should be used when talking about the Seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

    One of my SBs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in Cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at Miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on Seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off Seeking.

  3. #6959

    Babe1232 / Jess

    https://members.seeking.com/member/b...4-5e77e760468b

    Seems to be a deposit scammer. Wants $150 CashApp, then $150 at the meet. Claims this covers the whole month. Also claims schedule is really flexible. I could ask for a video verification, but this is TGTBT.

  4. #6958

    Little Red is back as Babygirl77

    She's got reviews on the old backpage section.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/a...a-4b751a8390c9

  5. #6957

    Texted Her

    Quote Originally Posted by Goo3215  [View Original Post]
    She messaged me also this weekend but something seemed off. I asked her to send me a video of her and she did but I was still skeptical based on the quality. Then I asked her to send me a video saying a specific phrase and it was there that I confirmed that it was a voice over. I stopped communicating at that point.
    I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.

  6. #6956

    Blue Eyed Queen

    Quote Originally Posted by TSD1959  [View Original Post]
    "BlueEyeQueen02" on Seeking. Post lists Cincinnati as location and age at 20. She messaged me "hey" Saturday evening. So I messaged back the same. Went quickly to text. Says she lives in West Chester area with her family. Claims she is working regular job. Looking to earn money for her own apartment. She was "down" to get together at West Chester Hotel that night for 300 DTF. She sent a full body picture that matched her profile picture. Slender body. Did not pursue.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/b...e-7611ffa26c5e

    TSD1959.
    She messaged me also this weekend but something seemed off. I asked her to send me a video of her and she did but I was still skeptical based on the quality. Then I asked her to send me a video saying a specific phrase and it was there that I confirmed that it was a voice over. I stopped communicating at that point.

  7. #6955

    BlueEyeQueen02

    "BlueEyeQueen02" on Seeking. Post lists Cincinnati as location and age at 20. She messaged me "hey" Saturday evening. So I messaged back the same. Went quickly to text. Says she lives in West Chester area with her family. Claims she is working regular job. Looking to earn money for her own apartment. She was "down" to get together at West Chester Hotel that night for 300 DTF. She sent a full body picture that matched her profile picture. Slender body. Did not pursue.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/b...e-7611ffa26c5e

    TSD1959.

  8. #6954

    DreamyHazel

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    That's odd behavior given that she volunteers to video chat on her profile. Did you ask for a video chat?

    BAM.
    She sent me a full body selfie with most of face exposed except part blocked by camera. TSD1959.

  9. #6953
    Quote Originally Posted by TSD1959  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-3b4a0fa23cb8

    Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

    TSD1959.
    There are several recent posts on the forum about her.

  10. #6952

    Hazel

    Quote Originally Posted by TSD1959  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-3b4a0fa23cb8

    Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

    TSD1959.
    Wants 450 for PPM. Cannot host. I'm out.

  11. #6951

    Dreamy Hazel. Seeking

    https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-3b4a0fa23cb8

    Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

    TSD1959.

  12. #6950
    Quote Originally Posted by WanderingAbout  [View Original Post]
    Will pitch you on her OF account and maybe nothing more.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...4-1f55efe08e9f
    You actually inquired thinking it is a legit ad?

  13. #6949

    Cecebunny

    Will pitch you on her OF account and maybe nothing more.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...4-1f55efe08e9f

  14. #6948
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1671

    Kelsi-42

    Quote Originally Posted by Ccurtis  [View Original Post]
    I have chatted with her. She tried to get money for a MnG. I declined and she is ghosting since. She also used PPM language on the site which made me nervous.

    BAM.

  15. #6947
    Senior Member


    Posts: 1671

    Fight Club Handoffs

    Quote Originally Posted by WarlockKy  [View Original Post]
    Don't talk about fight club.

    Most of the non-pro and UTR have no idea that some of us post to a board like this or for that matter know each other in real life.
    This also reinforces the fact that handoffs in the sugar bowl rarely work out well. Some women may be seeing a different SD every week but they still do not think of themselves as pros. As soon as they think they are being treated like an escort, they will cut off the offending guy (s). Of course, this can be a way of painlessly ending an arrangement that has run its course. Choose wisely.

    BAM.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Click here for the best sugar babies
Best Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape