Sugarbabies?

[Anvil]

This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.

The photos she sent me look like the little red discussed just a few posts down as having a new profile.

She might be doing multiples. Or it's her sister.

[BamBam]

Five days worth and a lengthy haul:

Fungirl: Pic seller with a nasty attitude. Shares her real number which gets her PII.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...c-eb2938925d12


OpenToIdeas: Says she is not living in Cinti. Will move here in the Fall. Wants an arrangement between now and then.

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...c-edd2ed7ee3cb


BrilliantCutie: Very odd profile! Married, 30, 6+ kids, 4'7", mixed, true love but profile shows FB verification.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...d-b51747587173


Baileykits: Likely Kenyan pic seller. Lazy and using a pic of Ireland Baldwin. Won't last long.

https://members.seeking.com/member/8...6-8108363e1d13


SurprisedDancer: scammer language, poor English.

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...4-9304720ec39d


CulturedMusician: Pic seller! Using a number from Iowa. If you call you get a girls voicemail but the message is unclear. Shares hot pics but using a guys paypal.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...2-06333ab6f0fc


Indianababy: Pic/video seller. Repeat profile. Got banned once before.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...6-55a2bce2a4af


HumbleGorgeous: "I do a down deposit of $50 and anything after that I'm free game" YMMV?

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...1-e8f9a7507bad


BrilliantModel: Classic crypto-scammer, told me we have chatted before and that I am repetitive. I apologized.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...f-79f3d3c5b523


Sexy: recent login = Australia, picture is all over the place: https://www.regional-kleinanzeigen.d...e-escort/5500. Offered to do sexy FT for a pmt to her cash app. Blocked me when I declined. https://www.tiktok.com/@elizabethanthony21?lang=en.

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...d-91f8ffe0a0ad


BAM

[BamBam]

seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so.

More discretion should be used when talking about the seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

One of my sbs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off seeking.

amen!

Bam.

[AlanDodson]

This one is weird. Pic numbers 2 and 4 in the profile match a now deleted SA profile for a legit girl I met a few times. Mechanical but decent time. I haven't seen pics #1 and #3 before but they really don't look much like her, and I saw her last about a month ago. I know you can photoshop and take good angles, but if I didn't see #2 and #4 I wouldn't even recognize her as the girl I met. Also the girl I met had no problems video / voice chatting and lived closer to Camp Washington and not West Chester. The language in her profile doesn't really match either.

Just be careful here fellas, several red flags about this profile. If it is the same girl I met from before, she is taking a significantly different approach from before.

I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.

[Todd Cincy]

This also reinforces the fact that handoffs in the sugar bowl rarely work out well. Some women may be seeing a different SD every week but they still do not think of themselves as pros. As soon as they think they are being treated like an escort, they will cut off the offending guy (s). Of course, this can be a way of painlessly ending an arrangement that has run its course. Choose wisely.

BAM.

Seeking was much better for many reasons between 2011 to 2014 or so. But one of the good things about it was that Seeking had not yet attracted the attention of online forums like this.

In 2017 to 2018, with the passage of SESTA / FOSTA, Seeking was inundated with the scammers that used to operate on BP and CL. But it was also inundated with guys who were looking for $60 "streetscorts", and that turned off many of the women.

I'm not saying that it's bad to have this section of the forum. The environment has much changed since the old days, and this is a valuable place to bring attention to scammers. (Scammers were comparatively rare on Seeking in the old days.) Almost no college girl, however, wants to have her digits tossed back and forth in a forum like this.

It's good to publicly expose the Seeking scammers. By all means. Post the profiles. Name and shame.

More discretion should be used when talking about the Seeking girls who *do* put out. Most of them are aware of the pathways to being a public escort, and they have intentionally *not* chosen that route. They choose to be sugar babies at least partly because they *don't* want a permanent, public online record of their extracurricular activities.

One of my SBs from 2013 is now a middle manager at a major corporation in Cincinnati. I met her when she was a senior at Miami. That is the kind of quality we used to get on Seeking. And girls like that don't want to be publicly discussed like the druggies and worn-out grandmas that get talked about in the escort section of this forum. Talking about them openly, moreover, is a good way to drive them off Seeking.

[Ginzo666]

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...4-5e77e760468b

Seems to be a deposit scammer. Wants $150 CashApp, then $150 at the meet. Claims this covers the whole month. Also claims schedule is really flexible. I could ask for a video verification, but this is TGTBT.

[WarlockKy]

She's got reviews on the old backpage section.

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...a-4b751a8390c9

[Ginzo666]

She messaged me also this weekend but something seemed off. I asked her to send me a video of her and she did but I was still skeptical based on the quality. Then I asked her to send me a video saying a specific phrase and it was there that I confirmed that it was a voice over. I stopped communicating at that point.

I had "her" on text, but the pictures she sent me were good, but not unrealistically good. Since she can't host, I didn't like her enough to mess around with a hotel. Looks like I dodged one.

[Goo3215]

"BlueEyeQueen02" on Seeking. Post lists Cincinnati as location and age at 20. She messaged me "hey" Saturday evening. So I messaged back the same. Went quickly to text. Says she lives in West Chester area with her family. Claims she is working regular job. Looking to earn money for her own apartment. She was "down" to get together at West Chester Hotel that night for 300 DTF. She sent a full body picture that matched her profile picture. Slender body. Did not pursue.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...e-7611ffa26c5e

TSD1959.

She messaged me also this weekend but something seemed off. I asked her to send me a video of her and she did but I was still skeptical based on the quality. Then I asked her to send me a video saying a specific phrase and it was there that I confirmed that it was a voice over. I stopped communicating at that point.

[TSD1959]

"BlueEyeQueen02" on Seeking. Post lists Cincinnati as location and age at 20. She messaged me "hey" Saturday evening. So I messaged back the same. Went quickly to text. Says she lives in West Chester area with her family. Claims she is working regular job. Looking to earn money for her own apartment. She was "down" to get together at West Chester Hotel that night for 300 DTF. She sent a full body picture that matched her profile picture. Slender body. Did not pursue.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...e-7611ffa26c5e

TSD1959.

[TSD1959]

That's odd behavior given that she volunteers to video chat on her profile. Did you ask for a video chat?

BAM.

She sent me a full body selfie with most of face exposed except part blocked by camera. TSD1959.

[Goo3215]

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-3b4a0fa23cb8

Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

TSD1959.

There are several recent posts on the forum about her.

[Ginzo666]

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-3b4a0fa23cb8

Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

TSD1959.

Wants 450 for PPM. Cannot host. I'm out.

[TSD1959]

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...0-3b4a0fa23cb8

Anyone have any experience with Dreamy Hazel? PM is fine if your willing to share information. Thanks in advance.

TSD1959.

[Hooter12]

Will pitch you on her OF account and maybe nothing more.

https://members.seeking.com/member/e...4-1f55efe08e9f

You actually inquired thinking it is a legit ad?