Non Pro's

[HelloThar]

Keep in mind that because of the global reach of the the web and all the unearned attention they get (from thirsty betas) the "unlimited" options are in their head a bit too. Most live in a online fantasy. At least most I've dealt with on SA under 25 (crazy). Really, out if the populace how many men have the means to drop 3/4/5/600 on poon. Not that many.

However, if they just want dick, they can get it at the drop of a hat. But 99% of the time they will go to a thug / bad boy / game ninja for a throttling. Not Mr. Mid age business man. (me) LOL.

One thing I've come to experience first hand is how crazy pretty much all SA girls are, or at the very least all have lingering issues of some sort. Which would follow otherwise they wouldn't be on the site.

Even the inexperienced ones begin to view sex as a matter of rate and time allowed before long. And then they wonder why guys don't want to see them for longer arrangements which leads to ridiculous ppms. Trying to find a normal girl at a normal rate is seemingly more and more difficult. But then again, my lack of patience doesn't lend well to it.

[PriceIsRight39]

I guess to be fair, if the roles were flipped and we had a ton of options to choose from, we would probably do the same thing. Message those we like and ghost all the rest.

I try to be direct as possible about meeting while being respectful to minimize wasted time even if that means I don't connect with some women. Some get all uppity and prudish when you do this, but chances are they're not the types you want to be with anyway. Many actually appreciate being upfront as they get a lot of time wasted by flakers or weirdos on the site apparently.

Those of you who play the long game with small talk and whatnot must have the patience of saints as I don't think I could do it on SA unless I was really interested in someone.

Keep in mind that because of the global reach of the the web and all the unearned attention they get (from thirsty betas) the "unlimited" options are in their head a bit too. Most live in a online fantasy. At least most I've dealt with on SA under 25 (crazy). Really, out if the populace how many men have the means to drop 3/4/5/600 on poon. Not that many.

However, if they just want dick, they can get it at the drop of a hat. But 99% of the time they will go to a thug / bad boy / game ninja for a throttling. Not Mr. Mid age business man. (me) LOL.

[HelloThar]

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...f-7529d48856a5

Anyone see this one before, seems kind of familiar. Gives off pro vibes from comms.

Would usually disregard, especially those with children and 30+, but tough to find ones outside of Seattle sometimes.

[Papicho]

I didn't see any of these reports, I guess I got lucky.

600 for 2 hours. Nicest ass I've ever seen and she begged me to fill it.

Are you saying that you boinked her?

I guess I was a hard pass for her and preferred to grab the one benji.

[HelloThar]

Yeah unfortunately my acct auto renewed so I guess I will try to suffer through. But it is amazing at how bad at responding they are even when you catch them online and talk on the site and then move off usually convo and wants etc trail off so fast it's nothing but a huge waste of time.

I guess to be fair, if the roles were flipped and we had a ton of options to choose from, we would probably do the same thing. Message those we like and ghost all the rest.

I try to be direct as possible about meeting while being respectful to minimize wasted time even if that means I don't connect with some women. Some get all uppity and prudish when you do this, but chances are they're not the types you want to be with anyway. Many actually appreciate being upfront as they get a lot of time wasted by flakers or weirdos on the site apparently.

Those of you who play the long game with small talk and whatnot must have the patience of saints as I don't think I could do it on SA unless I was really interested in someone.

[Marko Ramius]

Yeah unfortunately my acct auto renewed so I guess I will try to suffer through. But it is amazing at how bad at responding they are even when you catch them online and talk on the site and then move off usually convo and wants etc trail off so fast it's nothing but a huge waste of time.

"Online" isn't at all accurate for those sites. It doesn't even seem to have much to do with when they recently logged in. At times I suspect they are trying to make it appear they have more activity than they really have by putting some of their profiles "Online" temporarily.

Keep in mind that about ninety percent of the profiles are as fake as pro wrestling or female orgasms in porn.

[WhoreHey]

I didn't see any of these reports, I guess I got lucky.

600 for 2 hours. Nicest ass I've ever seen and she begged me to fill it.

[RocDiesel]

Not to mention she has a job and goes to school. Between that and her child, she magically has time for an arrangement. Just another full blown scammer.

On another note, anyone else notice how terrible all the SA women are at texts. I feel like the average chick takes 12-24 hours to respond, you reply once, and then it's another half day. I imagine however that they respond to all their texts at once due to the tons of messages most get. But even those from the other board are better at it.

I think I've only ever encountered 1 woman who was extremely prompt at responding. And interestingly enough she was great at sexting and being up for meeting quickly too.

Yeah unfortunately my acct auto renewed so I guess I will try to suffer through. But it is amazing at how bad at responding they are even when you catch them online and talk on the site and then move off usually convo and wants etc trail off so fast it's nothing but a huge waste of time.

[HelloThar]

Sounds like I dodged a bullet with this one. Had plans to meet up for coffee before she dropped the $1 k bomb. She did send me a photo of her DL and she is 19. However, she did a terrible job obfuscating her personal information. Searched up her name and found a Seattle Missing Child report from when she was 14. Also has a 2 year old child which would put her at 16/17 when giving birth. Plus her account was deactivated and she claims it was because she forgot her PW which I call BS on. Way too many red flags with this one.

Not to mention she has a job and goes to school. Between that and her child, she magically has time for an arrangement. Just another full blown scammer.

On another note, anyone else notice how terrible all the SA women are at texts. I feel like the average chick takes 12-24 hours to respond, you reply once, and then it's another half day. I imagine however that they respond to all their texts at once due to the tons of messages most get. But even those from the other board are better at it.

I think I've only ever encountered 1 woman who was extremely prompt at responding. And interestingly enough she was great at sexting and being up for meeting quickly too.

[PopItFank69]

I reported this lady Channel888 (before Channel444) as scam.

I met her in person. Legit 18-19, she has a fine piece of ass ngl, but don't let that cake get you oblivious like me, she is in the site for the quick money.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ro-s&p=6752514#post6752514.

Sounds like I dodged a bullet with this one. Had plans to meet up for coffee before she dropped the $1 k bomb. She did send me a photo of her DL and she is 19. However, she did a terrible job obfuscating her personal information. Searched up her name and found a Seattle Missing Child report from when she was 14. Also has a 2 year old child which would put her at 16/17 when giving birth. Plus her account was deactivated and she claims it was because she forgot her PW which I call BS on. Way too many red flags with this one.

[Papicho]

I finally got it out of her. She wants $1000 ppm covered, anal is extra lmfao. She seems a little screwy too.

I reported this lady Channel888 (before Channel444) as scam.

I met her in person. Legit 18-19, she has a fine piece of ass ngl, but don't let that cake get you oblivious like me, she is in the site for the quick money.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...ro-s&p=6752514#post6752514.

[PriceIsRight39]

I've noticed usually there are a wave of new girls on the first days of the month. That hasn't seemed to happen so far this month.

It has in the areas I look in. Like 8-10 new ones. But that site is Tinder now almost. Still a tumble full of ladies. I'm hanging on to the ones I have. Did get to bang a decent 19 yo recently. That's always fun. Actually college student. Guess she realized instead of gaming a fella why not get laid, eat, and pay for those books! About 2% get it.

They'll be around your area I'm sure. Remember cuffing season is giving way to hot girl summer. They'll need the money soon enough.

[PriceIsRight39]

Used to have a lot of success on this site. I made a new account a couple weeks ago and it's been nothing but a huge waste of time. Any decent looking girl is just a scammer or pic seller and while the ugly ones (85% of users) are real and responsive they want $$ These cows should be paying me to sleep with them! Considering charging back my sub.

It's basically Tinder now. Now for all your hard work get the privilege of paying for low grade females! It's only going to get worse now that the ugly ones are getting money! No living with them now! And no, your pics are filtered by AI so no 1 k for you! LOL.

[PopItFank69]

Chanel888.

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...b-bbe29d47c628

Looking for unknown monthly arrangement, apparently has a 2 yo despite her current profile saying she has none. She says she's up for ppm, but then just ghosts you if you mention it. This is her second account.

I finally got it out of her. She wants $1000 ppm covered, anal is extra lmfao. She seems a little screwy too.

[Marko Ramius]

I've noticed usually there are a wave of new girls on the first days of the month. That hasn't seemed to happen so far this month.