Rubrankings.com
click for FREE hookups
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Best Escorts
Sex Vacation

Thread: Non Pro's

+ Add Report
Page 11 of 540 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 61 111 511 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 165 of 8088
This blog is moderated by PolygamyMonger
  1. #7938

    Platonic

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkoRamius  [View Original Post]
    LOL I think a lot of them don't know what the word even means.
    You should see how many ask me what "platonic" means when I tell them non-platonic.

    But I agree, do not count them out if they have platonic in their profile. All the ones I have connected with successfully have had Platonic in their profile and many have said they just have it there but are open to non-platonic.

    So-Crates.

  2. #7937

    Platonic

    Quote Originally Posted by FarFarAway  [View Original Post]
    ...
    I also look carefully at all who say 'platonic. ' IK most of you guys block those immediately. Many who say platonic are just trying to avoid the messages that solicit them. And even some of those have sex toys on their wish lists. LOL.
    LOL I think a lot of them don't know what the word even means.

  3. #7936
    Quote Originally Posted by HelloThar  [View Original Post]
    I would filter out every SA chick who bothered to make a wishlist if I could. I don't mind gifts in person, but not when randomly asked, or worse yet, when you haven't met before. Major red flag for sure.
    It depends on the profile. I find it can give insight into the girl. If all she wants is 1000 handbags, well, of course. What if it is all sex toys?

    I also look carefully at all who say 'platonic. ' IK most of you guys block those immediately. Many who say platonic are just trying to avoid the messages that solicit them. And even some of those have sex toys on their wish lists. LOL.

  4. #7935
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco62  [View Original Post]
    A couple of ones that seemed promising at first but went downhill after switching to text. Both over 30, not bad looking, well spoken and both a little delusional.

    This one wanted "at least $600 ppm".

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...5-59a40d936213

    This one wanted $750 ppm.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/a...c-dd0232ddade8
    I must not be as charismatic. Out of curiosity I finished texting the second one and she wanted 1000 ppm. LOL.

    What are these women on and where can I get some myself. You might as well get someone from the other board who knows what she's doing stay overnight or a threesome at that rate. Not to mention she's 30+ years old.

    Think that's the highest I've seen yet.

  5. #7934

  6. #7933

    Miss Kay

    Quote Originally Posted by HelloThar  [View Original Post]
    Would definitely skip that one, bio is entitled, is worn out, has children. Pics are likely not even accurate.
    There are a few actual reports here. Pictures out of date as she is overweight now, foul odors, and even a Rob report.

  7. #7932
    Quote Originally Posted by PriceIsRight39  [View Original Post]
    Mm the brakes have been beat off that one. Only 33 sheesh. Don't know about being a pro. Lot of pros on SA.
    Would definitely skip that one, bio is entitled, is worn out, has children. Pics are likely not even accurate.

  8. #7931
    Quote Originally Posted by Spacehog  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/e...c-83a954e58467

    Has anybody seen Miss-Kay? She looks like a pro but I can't find her anywhere.
    Mm the brakes have been beat off that one. Only 33 sheesh. Don't know about being a pro. Lot of pros on SA.

  9. #7930

    Wish Lists are bad, mkay?

    Yeah, Wish Lists are a clear warning sign that you should stay away.

    Had a weird one on a related note a few months ago. She wouldn't meet in public and because she had severe anxiety (okay.) she could only meet in private for 45 minutes. I wished her luck and gav her a hard pass. A few weeks later she texted me wanting me to buy her a $3000 pair of shoes and saying her anxiety was better and we could meet for longer. Okay, still a hard pass.

    If they want to just meet for a short period of time it is a better use of your whoring dollar to just go to an AMP or AAMP. It costs you less and gets the job done. Yeah, you might get a granny but she probably won't be enormously fat, which is a very real risk with any of the girls on a Sugar site. So it comes out about the same.

  10. #7929
    Quote Originally Posted by BugManLet  [View Original Post]
    No wonder this one was a scammer, she calls out to you to support her wish list in her title! Add girls highlighting their wishlist ("if you really want to make yourself stand out.") to the avoid. Also she wants a guy "good at spoiling". Guys just look right through these red flags over some cute (fake) pics.
    I would filter out every SA chick who bothered to make a wishlist if I could. I don't mind gifts in person, but not when randomly asked, or worse yet, when you haven't met before. Major red flag for sure.

    And SA is full of these types. It makes you really appreciate the rare sweet girls who you really do want to spoil without them asking. A lot of these women just don't know what they're doing or are too jaded to care.

    Good reminder never to pay anything before meeting. Guarantee they will ghost you right afterwards and move onto the next mark.

  11. #7928

    Calls out her wish list. Hard pass

    Quote Originally Posted by CornholeBi  [View Original Post]
    I'd upvote you if I could. Been messaging a few girls and this one and I had a lot of back and forth.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...6-63c585b69552

    Long story short, she was able to produce a selfie of her with one of my requests but then the next time after a few exchanges of pics we were going to meet up. Gave me an address to a central apartment but when I asked for another selfie it was a terrrible photoshop of the first one. Like. Idiotically obvious. Wouldn't give me any other attempt or request just said they were totally different.

    Bummer. The vids and pics I got were so damn hot. Would have loved to actually meet this chick.
    No wonder this one was a scammer, she calls out to you to support her wish list in her title! Add girls highlighting their wishlist ("if you really want to make yourself stand out.") to the avoid. Also she wants a guy "good at spoiling". Guys just look right through these red flags over some cute (fake) pics.

  12. #7927
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkoRamius  [View Original Post]
    I'm pretty clear with my expectations with these girls (and that is ALWAYS a good idea) and I rarely go for girls who just want to meet up for an hour. My expectations are that we spend three or four hours together, minimum. That might include dinner or drinks but it might also be a sweaty fuckfest where we go for seconds and thirds and even fourths. That's what I consider fair for 400 to 500. Exceptionally skilled girls or girls with very generous boundaries might be able to ask for more and I might oblige them.
    As you should be! I more referring to the ones who are looking to charge like a pro where it's based on 1 hook up and go. Those ladies can kick rocks!

  13. #7926

    One hour?

    Quote Originally Posted by SocratesRvng  [View Original Post]
    ... In turn, most of these women have to only spend one hour with any given person from the site. There is definitely more loss on the male's side when it comes to equity in these arrangements.
    I'm pretty clear with my expectations with these girls (and that is ALWAYS a good idea) and I rarely go for girls who just want to meet up for an hour. My expectations are that we spend three or four hours together, minimum. That might include dinner or drinks but it might also be a sweaty fuckfest where we go for seconds and thirds and even fourths. That's what I consider fair for 400 to 500. Exceptionally skilled girls or girls with very generous boundaries might be able to ask for more and I might oblige them.

  14. #7925

    So she was sending you deep fake VIDS of herself in addition to photoshoped pics?

    Quote Originally Posted by CornholeBi  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/1...6-63c585b69552
    ...when I asked for another selfie it was a terrible photoshop of the first one. Like. Idiotically obvious...
    ...The VIDS and pics I got were so damn hot.
    If these hoes have gotten tech savvy enough to create deep fake VIDS of themselves I would give the Seeking site a hard pass.

  15. #7924

    Real but I'm sure a scammer

    https://members.seeking.com/member/8...e-6944891adb5e

    Talked to this one on Friday night. Got her number which was a 636 area code. I'm originally from the St. Louis, MO area so I recognized it immediately and she said she was from that area. Come to think about it, I recognize the profile from the STL-SA area.

    She seemed cool and complained about some guy stiffing her on pics she sent him. She said I was so cool she sent the pics to me just because. Benign pics (scantily clad) but nothing to get excited about. Anyway, we were going on and on. Never got into the "how much talk". She said she just moved to Washington from Missouri a couple weeks ago and is starting a job but is struggling with COL.

    At one point she claimed she was trying to scrounge up change to get something to eat so she was Foor Dashing or Uber Eats-ing, I guess. It was about 9 pm and she was complaining that she was $15 short in a way to suggest she needed help but didn't outright ask. I played dumb then she came out and just asked if I could send her $20. I told her no help until we've actually met up already. She begged that she would give me address and then give apartment number once I sent the money. Haha, good one. I knew then.

    Threw that yoke off!

    So-Crates.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
The Velvet Rooms
Ava Escorts





Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape