Thread: Legal Discussions / Raids / Busts
+
Add Report
Results 61 to 75 of 294
-
05-16-12 21:55 #234
Posts: 568Curious.
I'm curious: How many times have you had to draw your piece or draw on martial arts to defend yourself from attack? And of those instances, how many could have been diffused without force, if force weren't the first option? I'm a relatively old guy, and I've never once been assaulted or in a situation where talking my way through it didn't work. Of course, the only criminals I frequent are the petty sort. Mostly tax cheats, who I consider friends, and purveyors of sex for cash, who I choose very carefully. And, I stay in great shape running, lifting, and bicycling. Which helps dissuade folks from mistaking me for an easy mark. Generally I view carrying heat like health. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
Also, if you avoid criminals, what brings you to this board?
Originally Posted by AUniqueName [View Original Post]
-
05-16-12 09:33 #233
Posts: 224Update requested
Legal,
Whats the latest in the 1501 case? Any ruling on the "list" yet?
-
05-05-12 20:28 #232
Posts: 237It
One does not carry in order to go into a bad situation. One carries in order to try to get out of a bad situation.
There's no way to know what's going to happen when you leave the house, no matter what you're doing or where you're going. That's why I have emergency supplies in the truck. That's why I always strap on my cell phone and pistol when I leave the house. That's why I studied taekwondo. That's why I'm always scanning the surroundings as I go about my daily business. I'm quite confident in my ability to defend myself should the need arise. If you want to go through life as one of the sheep, that's your choice, but don't keep calling my decision to be prepared for what life throws at me "stupid."
You keep preaching "awareness and avoidance." Yeah, I'm aware Escorts are criminals, so I avoid Them. It's always best not to deal with the criminal element. And that Is much cheaper than either lawyers or funeral arrangements.
Originally Posted by Kyowa [View Original Post]
-
05-05-12 11:08 #231
Posts: 442Originally Posted by Kyowa [View Original Post]
Sometimes you can't foresee walking into a train wreck. Being prepared for anything isn't a crime. How you choose to react to it can be (which is your point I believe) , but being prepared is not.
-
05-05-12 02:26 #230
Posts: 1039Attention: AUniqueName; you have p
You have my reply in p'm' but you're welcome to copy_&_paste it here if you'd like to discuss it further on the public forum?
My main point: why would anyone choose to deliberately go into ANY situation that has a very high probability of ending badly for him (in any of several ways: including getting his gun stolen from him, & maybe even being killed himself) just because he is carrying his pistol with him?
Awareness & Avoidance are much cheaper & much more discreet than hiring Attorneys!
Play safeR & stay safe; sincerely: A K.
Originally Posted by AUniqueName [View Original Post]
-
05-04-12 18:57 #229
Posts: 237Lesser of two evils
Continued from.
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...=1#post1440534
Just in case it goes any further.
Originally Posted by Kyowa [View Original Post]
-
03-10-12 13:56 #228
Posts: 199The Power of Denial
Originally Posted by MissFancy [View Original Post]
1. You are who and what you claim to be: a former provider who has worked with The Troy, and.
2. The information you obtained is from law enforcement and from providers at both the stadium and the former 1501 locations.
It would be simple, exceptionally so, to dissect what you have stated and explain how and where you are wrong in your assertions, Miss Fancy. Rather than doing that, I would pose a couple of questions and await your response. If I am wrong in my assertions about The Troy's business relationship with Deleon:
1. Why did information about their business relationship turn up during the interviews of people associated with the My1501 investigation?
2. What is the motive of the former 1501 girls to lie about Troy's antics?
3. Why did the media think this information important enough to reference in their news coverage?
If you begin your recitation with a rejection of the idea that "T" and the "Troy" referred to in the article are two different people, you will instantly lose credibility, Miss Fancy. There is not a single rational, intelligent hobbyist on this board that believes this to be the case. There is far too much evidence supporting the common identity of the two. If you have read the various posts about Troy's personal relationship with Deleon, you understand and accept this to be the case. The "Troy" described in the article is your "T." Whether you accept the assertions made against him as true is a separate matter.
My final question is this, Miss Fancy. We have all had friends surprise us with their hidden conduct. We initially defend them, but privately look to see whether accusations made against them have any merit. Sometimes they are vindicated, and sometimes they stand convicted. Either way, we still hold them out as friends. Defending them is one thing. Covering for them is something altogether different. Your attack against me is personal, Miss Fancy; on the same level as that of The Troy himself.
4. If you and "T" are simply friends and co-workers, why is it so important to you that the information surfacing about him be wrong?
-
02-16-12 18:57 #227
Posts: 669Court Date
Marisa's court date was Valentine's Day, did anyone hear any news? Valentine's Day, was that planned?
-
02-16-12 06:52 #226
Posts: 160You mean those chicks are still saying they not guilty? Whats that about?
-
02-13-12 04:01 #225
Posts: 199Not accurate or even the prosecutor in the case.
Originally Posted by Ralphisit [View Original Post]
Furthermore, the list itself is hearsay without supporting testimony. It would never be used absent witness corroboration, and would only be offered into evidence during a court hearing. A prosecutor would not take the time to explain the improprieties and consequences of a circumstance (leaking potential evidence) that would never occur in the first place. Consider how and why the comment was posted and that will give you some idea of who is behind its publication.
-
02-12-12 14:31 #224
Posts: 649Originally Posted by GreatCatHunter [View Original Post]
I look for these two gals to head out of Cincy, somewhere like the ville, Indy or Lex, so be on your toes.
-
02-09-12 23:04 #223
Posts: 79Originally Posted by Ralphisit [View Original Post]
-
02-09-12 18:37 #222
Posts: 669Motel clerk "Rats" him out, Provider spills her guts.
Talk about talking too much. http://nky.cincinnati.com/article/AB...es?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|News
-
02-05-12 23:55 #221
Posts: 669My 1501 cases.
Just stumbled onto this on some weird blog."here's the status of the wimmens' cases: Marisa R. Requested a PD. But denied. Set for PTC on valentines day. Kristen N, and Donna L, PTC on March 7 Abigail P. Case pending. Ivan D. And Jeana K. Have no charges." and down the thread was this:Though I comment from time to time as 'The Dalai let me, ' for the amusement of my friends, I am a Deputy Prosecuting Attorney in Clark County. My name is Matthew let me. I invite any interested person to check the link above. There are rules of professional conduct for all attorneys and some that are particular to prosecutors. If a person were charged with a single offense and were found to be in possession of a list of names, it may invite suspicion that the named persons participated in some criminal activity. If a person was charged with trafficking drugs, a list of names would might be seen as drug users. With 100 names on the list, it might suggest that the person charged with a single incident of drug dealing had actually committed 100 crimes. I believe it would be improper for a prosecutor to release such information as it would be viewed as a statement as to the character of the accused that is not permitted under the rules. It's not permitted, because it's not fair. Evidence of the credibility and reliability of the list would have to be established before it would be admissible as evidence in court. It is certainly improper for a prosecutor to take information that he or she knows to be inadmissible at trial, and release it to the media.
There is no way for any person to prevent themselves from being placed on someone's 'list. ' If one's true name (not a made up alias or screen name) is on such a list, where can they go to get their reputation back? Where can they go and clear their name? All that is left is 'blog justice. ' For a Prosecutor to lend the credibility of the authority of his office by providing a list suggesting criminal acts on the part of uncharged persons is wrong on its face.
Releasing any 'list, ' (I have never seen such a list) without evidentiary support, would be unfair to persons charged and unfair to persons named.
All persons charged are presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty in court.
-
01-07-12 05:19 #220
Posts: 199My1501 Update
A quick status check of the cases indicates that all the defendants are set for a court review on January 19, 2012. Perry's case has not been indicted, so it appears that she may resolve her action along with the remaining co-defendants. This is a positive development in so far as it suggests that the cases may be settled without a trial.