The reviews there (TER) are useless
[QUOTE=Malabar]I used to be a member several years ago. At that time two providers, that advertised on EROS, were popped by MBI. Their mugshots were made public and their ads were removed. After a short "vacation", one of them started advertising on EROS again. I posted a warning review to alert the monger community about her recent arrest.
TER did not permit the review to be posted. I allowed my membership to lapse and never went back.
Mal
P.S.
As I said, that was several years ago. That provider is still advertising on EROS.[/QUOTE]
Rarely does a provider get a bad review. There is no comparison. This site is 10000% better.
Adrianna Leal - visiting (leaving tomorrow)
Had a fantastic time with Adrianna - will post review under corresponding thread. But no doubt, this girl is very pretty (super petite) and the Real Deal.
[url]http://www.escorts.com/viewprofile.asp?m=2550429[/url]
Over use of Real Deal/Raw Deal
The intention of this thread, if I understand it correctly, was to post a list of established providers that were considered the "real deal" for easy access rather than searching through the Escort Reviews thread.
To me this means that girls for which their is controversy or who are new should be fully vetted In Escort Reports before being posted here.
Can members please stop cross posting their reports - discuss the good/bad/different experiences before deciding to posting here or in Raw Deals. We all know YMMV is part of the hobby, but there are providers who give consistently great services to a wide variety of hobbyists - these are the only girls that should be mentioned here.
My 2 cents - and sorry to waste a post on this - but these controversial discussions belong elsewhere.